Are There Grounds of Logical Necessity?

Otávio Bueno

doi:10.5007/1808-1711.2023.e93657

Authors

Otávio Bueno Department of Philosophy, University of Miami

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2023.e93657

Keywords:

Logical necessity, grounds, logical aliens, Stroud

Abstract

An examination of the grounds of logical necessity is offered by taking its lead from Barry Stroud’s challenge to the possibility of articulating satisfactorily any such grounds in full generality. The intelligibility of logical aliens is also considered, and different conceptions of such aliens, some more radical in their treatment of the issue than others, are examined as well. Logical aliens are beings whose thinking goes beyond the limits of thought, presumably with a logic different from our own. I argue that logical aliens are either something straightforward and unproblematic or something we cannot recognize as logical. In either case, there are ways of accommodating such aliens despite the fact that the search for grounds of logical necessity is ultimately misguided.

References

Aristotle. 1984. Metaphysics. Trans. W.D. Ross. In: J. Barnes (ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, v.2, p.1552-1728. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Bueno, O. 2011. Is the Pyrrhonist an Internalist?. In: D. Machuca (ed.), New Essays on Ancient Pyrrhonism, p.179-192. Leiden: Brill.

Bueno, O. 2013. Disagreeing with the Pyrrhonist?. In: D. Machuca (ed.), Disagreement and Skepticism, p.24-45. New York: Routledge.

Bueno, O. 2021. Modality and the Plurality of Logics. In: O. Bueno & S. Shalkowski (eds.), Handbook of Modality, p.319-327. London: Routledge.

Bueno, O. 2022. Revising Logics. In: J.-Y. Béziau; J.-P. Desclés; A. Moktefi; A.C. Pascu (eds.), Logic in Question, p.303-320. Dordrecht: Birkhäuser.

Bueno, O. & Shalkowski, S. 2009. Modalism and Logical Pluralism. Mind 118: 295-321.

Conant, J. 1991. The Search for Logically Alien Thought: Descartes, Kant, Frege, and the Tractatus. Philosophical Topics 20: 115-180. (Reprinted in Sofia Miguens (ed.), The Logical Alien: Conant and his Critics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2020.)

da Costa, N.C.A. & Bueno, O. 2009. Non-Reflexive Logics. Revista Brasileira de Filosofia 232: 181-196.

da Costa, N.C.A.; Krause, D.; Bueno, O. 2007. Paraconsistent Logics and Paraconsistency. In: D. Jacquette (ed.), Philosophy of Logic, p.791-911. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

French, S. & Krause, D. 2006. Identity in Physics: A Historical, Philosophical, and Formal Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Priest, G. 2002. Beyond the Limits of Thought. Second, expanded edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Priest, G. 2006a. Doubt Truth to be a Liar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Priest, G. 2006b. In Contradiction: A Study of the Transconsistent. Second, expanded edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Sextus Empiricus. 2000. Outlines of Scepticism. Ed. and trans. J. Annas & J. Barnes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Stroud, B. 1984. The Significance of Philosophical Scepticism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Stroud, B. 2000. Understanding Human Knowledge: Philosophical Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stroud, B. 2011. Engagement and Metaphysical Dissatisfaction: Modality and Value. New York: Oxford University Press.

Stroud, B. 2018. Logical Aliens and the “Ground” of Logical Necessity. In: Seeing, Knowing, Understanding: Philosophical Essays, p.205-217. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Originally written for and reprinted in Sofia Miguens (ed.), The Logical Alien: Conant and his Critics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2020.)

Williams, M. 1996. Unnatural Doubts: Epistemological Realism and the Basis of Scepticism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Wittgenstein, L. 1922. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Trans. C.K. Ogden. London: Kegan Paul.