A real argument to defy classical logic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2024.e96699Keywords:
Classical Logic, Real Arguments, Pascal´s Wager, Evaluation of Arguments, Deductive ReasoningAbstract
In this paper, an argument by Fisher (2004) is formalized and evaluated by means of some tools of classical logic. The argument presented by Fisher is a version of a piece of reasoning of great historical importance known as Pascal’s Wager. According to Fisher, “this is a fascinating piece of reasoning. It is complex and important and hard to handle”. Here is shown that, although formal logical analysis has limitations to evaluate everyday deductive arguments, it is perfectly capable to formalize and evaluate Fisher’s argument. This should show that its usefulness is undeniable.
References
Copi, M. I.; Cohen, C.; McMahon, K. 2014. Introduction to Logic. USA: Pearson New International Edition.
Fisher, A. 2004. The logic of real arguments. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hernández, H. 2017. ¿Ayuda la enseñanza de la lógica a los estudiantes a argumentar mejor?. Quadripartita Ratio: revista de retórica y argumentación, 2(3): 30-34.
Jordan, J. 2006. Pascal´s Wager: Pragmatic Arguments and Belief in God. New York: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Héctor Hernández Ortiz
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
![Licença Creative Commons](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/3.0/88x31.png)
Principia http://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/index is licenced under a Creative Commons - Atribuição-Uso Não-Comercial-Não a obras derivadas 3.0 Unported.
Base available in www.periodicos.ufsc.br.