Correcting Ryle’s Mistake: Motor Redundancy and the Embodied Intelligence of Habits
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2024.e98375Keywords:
Habits, Intelligent Behavior, Know-how, Motor Redundancy, Autonomist EnactivismAbstract
Embodied cognition and enactive approaches have criticized the associationist, also called mechanistic, view of habits. Motivated by the enactive account of habits and research on the field of Motor Control, I argue that Ryle was both wrong and right about habits and their relation to intelligent behavior. Ryle was wrong in claiming that habits fall short of intelligent behavior. But Ryle was also right, he correctly puts habits in a continuity that goes from dispositions in general to what he considers bonafide intelligent behavior or knowing-how. After some background, the Rylean distinction between habits and intelligent behavior is explored. I then move to Ryle’s mistake and its roots, tacitly endorsing the idea of instinct as innate behavior. In doing so, he neglected that variability and modifiability are the rules and not the exceptions in behavior. Research on the phenomena of motor redundancy of animal behavior, the enactive account of habits, and a dynamic account of intelligence are mobilized to correct his mistake. My proposed account explains Ryle’s mistake, why it is a mistake, and why it is an understandable mistake coming from someone with his perspective. The last section of the paper re-articulates the continuum between simple dispositions, habits, and highly skilled behavior. I reconceived the continuum of intelligence as including not only our habits, but all animal behavior.
References
Alksnis, Nikolai; Reynolds, Jack. 2021. Revaluing the Behaviorist Ghost in Enactivism and Embodied Cognition. Synthese 198 (6): 5785–5807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02432-1.
Barandiaran, Xabier E. 2017. Autonomy and Enactivism: Towards a Theory of Sensorimotor Autonomous Agency. Topoi 36 (3): 409–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-016-9365-4.
Barandiaran, Xabier E.; Di Paolo, Ezequiel. 2014. A Genealogical Map of the Concept of Habit. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8: 522. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00522.
Barrett, Louise. 2019. Enactivism, Pragmatism…behaviorism?. Philosophical Studies 176 (3): 807–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-018-01231-7.
Bateson, Patrick; Mameli, Matteo. 2007. The Innate and the Acquired: Useful Clusters or a Residual Distinction from Folk Biology?. Developmental Psychobiology 49 (8): 818–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.20277.
Bennett, Timothy; Thomas, Liam; Wilson, Andrew D. 2023. Affordances for Throwing: An Uncontrolled Manifold Analysis. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/u4j2g.
Bernstein, Nikolai Aleksandrovich. 1930. A New Method of Mirror Cyclographie and Its Application towards the Study of Labor Movements during Work on a Workbench. Hygiene, Safety and Pathology of Labor 56: 3–9.
Bernstein, Nikolai Aleksandrovich. 1967. The Co-Ordination and Regulation of Movements. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Calvo, Paco; Trewavas, Anthony. 2021. Cognition and Intelligence of Green Plants. Information for Animal Scientists. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, Rethinking Cognition: From Animal to Minimal, 564 (July): 78–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.07.139.
Darwin, Charles. 1859. On the Origin of Species or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. New York: D. Appleton and Co.
Dewey, John. 1930. Human Nature and Conduct: An Introduction to Social Psychology. New York: Random House.
Di Paolo, Ezequiel. 2005. Autopoiesis, Adaptivity, Teleology, Agency. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4 (4): 429–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-005-9002-y.
Di Paolo, Ezequiel. 2009. Extended Life. Topoi 28 (1): 9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-008-9042-3.
Di Paolo, Ezequiel. 2019. Process and Individuation: The Development of Sensorimotor Agency. Human Development 63 (3–4): 202–26. https://doi.org/10.1159/000503827.
Di Paolo, Ezequiel; Buhrmann, Thomas; Barandiaran, Xabier E. 2017. Sensorimotor Life: An Enactive Proposal. First edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Egbert, Matthew D.; Barandiaran, Xabier E. 2014. Modeling Habits as Self-Sustaining Patterns of Sensorimotor Behavior. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8: 590. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00590.
Egbert, Matthew D.; Barandiaran, Xabier E.; Di Paolo, Ezequiel. 2010. A Minimal Model of Metabolism-Based Chemotaxis. PLOS Computational Biology 6 (12). https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.10011004.
Egbert, Matthew D.; Barandiaran, Xabier E.; Di Paolo, Ezequiel. 2011. Behavioral Metabolution: The Adaptive and Evolutionary Potential of Metabolism-Based Chemotaxis. Artificial Life 18 (1): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1162/artl_a_00047.
Egbert, Matthew; Hanczyc, Martin M.; Harvey, Inman; Virgo, Nathaniel; Parke, Emily C.; Froese, Tom; Sayama, Hiroki; Penn, Alexandra S.; Bartlett, Stuart. 2023. Behaviour and the Origin of Organisms. Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres, May. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11084-023-09635-0.
Fodor, Jeremy. 1975. The Language of Thought. Harvard University Press.
Froese, Tom; Di Paolo, Ezequiel. 2011. The Enactive Approach: Theoretical Sketches from Cell to Society. Pragmatics & Cognition 19 (1): 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.19.1.01fro.
Gallagher, Shaun. 2017. Enactivist Interventions: Rethinking the Mind. First edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Griffiths, Paul; Linquist, Stefan. 2022. The Distinction Between Innate and Acquired Characteristics. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, Spring 2022. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2022/entries/innate-acquired/.
Honegger, Kyle; de Bivort, Benjamin. 2018. Stochasticity, Individuality and Behavior. Current Biology 28 (1): R8–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.11.058.
Hutto, Daniel D. 2005. Knowing What? Radical versus Conservative Enactivism. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4: 389–405.
Hutto, Daniel D. 2023. A Positively Relaxed Take on Naturalism: Reasons to Be Relaxed but Not Too Liberal. Topoi, March. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-023-09892-8.
Hutto, Daniel D.; Robertson, Ian. 2020. Clarifying the Character of Habits: Understanding What and How They Explain. In Habits: Pragmatist Approaches from Cognitive Science, Neuroscience, and Social Theory, edited by Fausto Caruana and Italo Testa, 204–22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108682312.010.
James, William. 1890. The Principles of Psychology. New York: Holt and Company.
Jaric, Slobodan; Latash, Mark L. 1999. Learning a Pointing Task with a Kinematically Redundant Limb: Emerging Synergies and Patterns of Final Position Variability. Human Movement Science 18 (6): 819–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9457(99)00042-1.
Kuo, Zing Yang. 1922. How Are Our Instincts Acquired?. Psychological Review 29: 344–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0073689.
Kuo, Zing Yang. 1921. Giving up Instincts in Psychology. The Journal of Philosophy 18 (24): 645–64. https://doi.org/10.2307/2939656.
Latash, Mark L. 2010. Motor Synergies and the Equilibrium-Point Hypothesis. Motor Control 14 (3): 294–322. https://doi.org/10.1123/mcj.14.3.294.
Latash, Mark L. 2012. The Bliss (Not the Problem) of Motor Abundance (Not Redundancy). Experimental Brain Research 217 (1): 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3000-4.
Latash, Mark L.; Kang, Ning; Patterson, David. 2002. Finger Coordination in Persons with Down Syndrome: Atypical Patterns of Coordination and the Effects of Practice. Experimental Brain Research 146 (3): 345–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-002-1189-3.
Levin, Janet. 2023. Functionalism. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman, Summer 2023. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2023/entries/functionalism/.
Lyon, Pamela; Keijzer, Fred; Arendt, Detlev; Levin; Michael. 2021. Reframing Cognition: Getting down to Biological Basics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 376 (1820): 20190750. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0750.
Maturana, Humberto; Varela, Francisco J. 1980. Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. Kluwer Academic: Dordrecht.
Miyahara, Katsunori; Ransom, Tailer G.; Gallagher, Shaun. 2020. What the Situation Affords: Habit and Heedful Interrelations in Skilled Performance. In Habits, edited by Fausto Caruana and Italo Testa, 1st ed., 120–36. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108682312.006.
Miyahara, Katsunori; Robertson, Ian. 2021. The Pragmatic Intelligence of Habits. Topoi 40 (3): 597–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-020-09735-w.
Myin, Erik; van den Herik, Jasper C. 2020. A Twofold Tale of One Mind: Revisiting REC’s Multi-Storey Story. Synthese, September. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02857-z.
Neander, Karen. 2020. Teleological Theories of Mental Content. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2020/entries/content-teleological/.
Noë, Alva. 2004. Action in Perception. London: MIT Press.
O’Regan, J. K.; Noë, Alva. 2001. A Sensorimotor Account of Vision and Visual Consciousness. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5): 939–73; discussion 973-1031. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x01000115.
Ramírez-Vizcaya, Susana; Froese, Tom. 2019. The Enactive Approach to Habits: New Concepts for the Cognitive Science of Bad Habits and Addiction. Frontiers in Psychology 10 (February): 301. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00301.
Ritchie, J. Brendan. 2021. What’s Wrong with the Minimal Conception of Innateness in Cognitive Science?. Synthese 199 (1): 159–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02543-0.
Rolla, Giovanni. 2021. A Mente Enativa. https://doi.org/10.22350/9786559173341.
Rolla, Giovanni; Huffermann, Jeferson. 2021. Converging Enactivisms: Radical Enactivism Meets Linguistic Bodies. Adaptive Behavior, June, 105971232110207. https://doi.org/10.1177/10597123211020782.
Ryle, Gilbert. 1953. Ordinary Language. The Philosophical Review 62 (2): 167–86.
Ryle, Gilbert. 2009. The Concept of Mind. London ; New York: Routledge.
Scholz, J. P.; Schöner, G.. 1999. The Uncontrolled Manifold Concept: Identifying Control Variables for a Functional Task. Experimental Brain Research 126 (3): 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002210050738.
Schütz, Christian G.; Ramírez-Vizcaya, Susana; Froese, Tom. 2018. The Clinical Concept of Opioid Addiction Since 1877: Still Wanting After All These Years. Frontiers in Psychiatry 9: 508. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00508.
Sterelny, Kim. 1990. The Representational Theory of Mind. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Tanney, Julia. 2009. Rethinking Ryle: A Critical Discussion of The Concept of Mind. In The Concept of Mind, by Gilbert Ryle. London ; New York: Routledge.
Tanney, Julia. 2022. Gilbert Ryle. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, Summer 2022. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2022/entries/ryle/.
Testa, Italo; Caruana, Fausto. 2020. The Pragmatist Reappraisal of Habit in Contemporary Cognitive Science, Neuroscience, and Social Theory: Introductory Essay. In Habits: Pragmatist Approaches from Cognitive Science, Neuroscience, and Social Theory, edited by Fausto Caruana and Italo Testa, 1–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108682312.001.
Thelen, Esther; Smith, L. B. 1994. A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Thompson, Evan. 2007. Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Varela, Francisco J. 1999. Ethical Know-How: Action, Wisdom, and Cognition. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Varela, Francisco J.; Thompson, Evan; Rosch, Eleanor. 2017. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Revised Edition. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
Wallace, Alfred Russel. 1891. Natural Selection and Tropical Nature. London: Macmillan.
Ward, Dave; Silverman, David; Villalobos, Mario. 2017. Introduction: The Varieties of Enactivism. Topoi 36 (3): 365–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-017-9484-6.
Wood, Wendy; Rünger, Dennis. 2016. Psychology of Habit. Annual Review of Psychology 67: 289–314. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033417.
Yang, J.-F.; Scholz, J. P. 2005. Learning a Throwing Task Is Associated with Differential Changes in the Use of Motor Abundance. Experimental Brain Research 163 (2): 137–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-004-2149-x.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jeferson Diello Huffermann
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Principia http://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/index is licenced under a Creative Commons - Atribuição-Uso Não-Comercial-Não a obras derivadas 3.0 Unported.
Base available in www.periodicos.ufsc.br.
