The cosmological divergent proliferation in Feyerabend's pluralism

Deivide Garcia da Silva Oliveira

doi:10.5007/1808-1711.2021.e72764

Authors

Deivide Garcia da Silva Oliveira Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2021.e72764

Abstract

In this paper, I argue that Feyerabendian proliferation is best understood as cosmologically divergent proliferation. The divergent aspect is inspired by a Darwinian background, and it affects other elements of Feyerabend’s philosophy, as much as the way his pluralism advances, like the cosmological dimension. This cosmological item influences not only how theories should proliferate - divergently - but also why they must be tenaciously retained and compared. On this account, we underline Feyerabend’s view that the principle of proliferation is never alone; instead, it is always coupled with the principle of tenacity. This is the reason we take these two principles as two sides of the same coin. Moreover, when approaching tenacity, we discuss three aspects of tenacity (attractiveness, fruitfulness, and retainment) under two forms of how they are related to the cosmologically divergent proliferation. First, working on many cosmologies, allowed by proliferation, to develop them. Second, retaining all theories by what is called a practical suspension or setback. As a result, we argue that such an approach, divergent pluralism, is an adequate way for understanding Feyerabend’s pluralism and a clear way of avoiding misunderstandings of his view.

Author Biography

Deivide Garcia da Silva Oliveira, Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia

Professor Adjunto, Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Ambientais e Biológicas-CCAAB

References

Athanasopoulos, C. 1994. Pyrrhonism and Paul Feyerabend: A study of ancient and modern scepticism. Hellenistic philosophy 2: 11–29.

Bacon, F. 2003 [1620]. The New Organon. L. Jardine & M. Silverthorne (eds). 3rd ed. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bailer-Jones, D. M. 2000. Modelling extended extragalactic radio sources. Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies In History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 31(1): 49–74.

Benvenuto, S. 1995. Paul K. Feyerabend (1924-1994) – Search for Abundance. Telos 21(102): 107–114. doi: 10.3817/1295102107

Brown, M. J. 2016. The Abundant World: Paul Feyerabend’s Metaphysics of Science. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science Part A 57: 142–154.

Bschir, K. 2015. Feyerabend and Popper on theory proliferation and anomaly import: On the compatibility of theoretical pluralism and critical rationalism. HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 5(1): 24–55.

Butts, R. E. 1966. Feyerabend and the pragmatic theory of observation. Philosophy of Science 33(4): 383–394.

Cartwright, N. 1999. The dappled world: A study of the boundaries of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chang, H. 2012. Is Water H2O? Evidence, Realism and Pluralism. Dordrecht The Netherlands; New York: Springer.

Chang, H. 2021. The coherence of Feyerabend’s pluralist realism. In Interpreting Feyerabend: critical essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.40–56.

Darwin, C. 2009 [1859]. The Origin of Species – By Means of Natural Selection, or the Preser vation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Darwin, F., & Seward, A. 1903. More Letters of Charles Darwin. London: Murray.

Farrell, R. P. 2003. Feyerabend and scientific values: tightrope-walking rationality. Dordrecht; Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Feyerabend, P. 1961. Comments on Grünbaum’s “Law and Convention in Physical Theory”. In: H. F. a. G. Maxwell (ed.), Current Issues in the Philosophy of Science. Symposia of Scientists and Philosophers. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, pp.155–161

Feyerabend, P. 1962. Explanation, Reduction and Empiricism. Scientific Explanation, Space and Time. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 3: 28–97.

Feyerabend, P. 1965a. Problems of empiricism. In R. Colodny (ed.), Beyond the edge of Certainty. University of Pittsburgh Press: Prentice-Hall, INC.

Feyerabend, P. 1965b. Reply to Criticism: Comments on Smart, Sellars and Putnam. Proceedings of the boston colloquium for the philosophy of science, pp.223–261.

Feyerabend, P. 1969. Science without experience. The Journal of Philosophy 66: 791–794.

Feyerabend, P. 1970. Problem of empiricism, part II. In R. G. Colodny (ed.), The nature and function of scientific Theories: Essays in contemporary science and philosophy (Vol. V4). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp.275–353).

Feyerabend, P. 1975. Against method: outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. London Atlantic Highlands, N. J.: Verso.

Feyerabend, P. 1981a. Historical background – Some observations on the decay of the philosophy of science. In: Philosophical Papers – Problems of Empiricism (Vol. 2) Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.1–33.

Feyerabend, P. 1981b. Introduction: Proliferation and realism as methodological principles. In Philosophical papers – Realism, Rationalism and Scientific Method (Vol. 1). Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.139–145.

Feyerabend, P. 1981c. Philosophical papers – Problems of Empiricism (Vol. 2). Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.

Feyerabend, P. 1981d. Philosophical papers – Realism, Rationalism and Scientific Method. (Vol. 1). Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press.

Feyerabend, P. 1981e. Two models of epistemic change: Mill and Hegel. In Philosophical Papers – Problems of Empiricism (Vol. 2). Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.65–80.

Feyerabend, P. 1981 [1970]. Consolation for the specialist. In Philosophical Papers – Problems of Empiricism (Vol. 2). Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.131–161.

Feyerabend, P. 1987. Farewell to reason. London; New York: Verso.

Feyerabend, P. 1993. Against method. 3rd ed. New York: Verso.

Feyerabend, P. (1999 [1961]). Knowledge without foundation. In J. Preston (ed.), Philosophical Papers – Knowledge, science, and relativism (Vol. 3). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.50–77.

Feyerabend, P. 1999 [1963]. How to be a Good Empiricist; A Plea for Tolerance in Matters Epistemological. In J. Preston (Ed.), Philosophical Papers – Knowledge, science, and relativism (Vol. 3). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.78–103.

Feyerabend, P. 1999 [1968]. Outline of a pluralistic theory of knowledge and action. In J. Preston (ed.), Philosophical Papers – Knowledge, science, and relativism (Vol. 3). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.104-111.

Feyerabend, P. 1999 [1980]. Democracy, Elitism and Scientific Method. In Philosophical Papers – Knowledge, science and Relativism (Vol. 3). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.212–226.

Feyerabend, P. 1999 [1994]. Potentially Every Culture is All Cultures. In B. Terpstra (ed.), Conquest of Abundance – A tale of abstraction versus the richness of being. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, pp.215–216.

Feyerabend, P., & Oberheim, E. 2011. Tyranny of science. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Feyerabend, P., & Preston, J. 1999. Philosophical Papers – Knowledge, science, and relativism (Vol. 3). Cambridge New York: Cambridge University Press.

Feyerabend, P., & Terpstra, B. 1999. Conquest of abundance: a tale of abstraction versus the richness of being. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Giere, R. N. 2016. Feyerabend’s perspectivism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 57: 137–141. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.11.008

Godfrey-Smith, P. 2009. Darwinian populations and natural selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Goertzen, J. 2007. Convergent pluralism and the unity-disunity debate in psychology. History and Philosophy of Psychology Bulletin 19(1): 11–16.

Heller, L. 2016. Between relativism and pluralism: Philosophical and political relativism in Feyerabend’s late work. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 57: 96–105.

Lloyd, E. A. 1997. Feyerabend, Mill, and pluralism. Philosophy of Science 64: S396-S407.

Manchak, J. 2021. On Feyerabend, General Relativity, and ‘Unreasonable’ Universes. In: Interpreting Feyerabend: Critical papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mill, J. S. 1961. The philosophy of John Stuart Mill: Ethical, political, and religious. M. Cohen (ed.) New York: Modern Library.

Mitchell, S. D. 2002. Integrative Pluralism. Biology and Philosophy 17: 55–70.

Munévar, G. 2002. Critical notice: conquering Feyerabend’s Conquest of abundance. Philosophy of Science 69(3): 519–535.

Neto, J. R. M. 1991. Feyerabend’s scepticism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 22(4): 543–555.

Oberheim, E. 2012 [2006]. Feyerabend’s philosophy (2nd ed. Vol. 73). Berlin, Boston: Walter de Gruyter.

Oberheim;, E., & Hoyningen-Huene, P. 2018. The Incommensurability of Scientific Theories. In: E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Standard Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.

Pepper, S. C. 1942. World hypotheses: A study in evidence (Vol. 31). Berkeley, CA: Univ of California Press.

Popper, K. R. 1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic Books, Inc.

Popper, K. R. 1972. Objective knowledge; an evolutionary approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Preston, J. 1997. Feyerabend: philosophy, science and society. Cambridge, MA: Polity press.

Preston, J. 2000. Science as supermarket. The Worst enemy of science, 80–101.

Preston, J. 2020. Paul Feyerabend. In: E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2020 ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/feyerabend. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.

Richards, R. J., & Ruse, M. 2016. Debating Darwin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Ruphy, S. 2011. From Hacking’s plurality of styles of scientific reasoning to “Foliated” pluralism: A philosophically robust form of ontologico-methodological pluralism. Philosophy of Science 78(5): 1212–1222.

Ruphy, S. 2017. Scientific pluralism reconsidered: A new approach to the (dis) unity of science. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

Ruse, M. 1999. The Darwinian revolution – science red in tooth and claw. (2nd ed.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Shaw, J. 2016. Pluralism, pragmatism and functional explanations. Kairos. Journal of Philosophy & Science 15(1): 1–18.

Shaw, J. 2017. Was Feyerabend an anarchist? The structure(s) of ‘anything goes’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science part A 64: 1-11.

Tambolo, L. 2007. Il “pluralismo libertario” di Feyerabend. Rivista di filosofia 98(3): 385–416.

Tambolo, L. 2015. A tale of three theories: Feyerabend and Popper on progress and the aim of science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 5: 33–41.