A indissociabilidade entre Física e Visão de Mundo segundo Paul K. Feyerabend
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2022.e85000Palabras clave:
Feyerabend, Visão de Mundo, Mecânica Quântica, Física Clássica, Atitude, CompreensibilidadeResumen
Paul Feyerabend, entre os anos de 1948 e 1970, discutiu diversas questões concernentes à mecânica quântica: problema da medição, a complementaridade e o “corte” entre o regime macro e micro, foram alguns dos assuntos mais estudados. Desde seus primeiros trabalhos acadêmicos, é possível identificar aspectos que o serão caros durante toda sua vida, como é o caso da relação entre conhecimento físico e visões de mundo. A partir de uma reconstrução de seu pensamento (entre os anos de 1948 e 1970), o presente artigo busca compreender como suas críticas à mecânica quântica o levaram a defender que a física clássica é mais fundamental que a mecânica quântica, não o contrário, além de discutir a relação entre conhecimento físico e visão de mundo, algo que, para Feyerabend, é indissociável.
Citas
Abrahão, L. H. L. 2015. O Pluralismo Global de Paul Feyerabend. Tese de Doutorado. Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte.
Abrahão, L. H. L. 2019. Feyerabendiana (1951): tradução e comentários. Tradução em revista.
Balsas, Á. & Videira, A. L. L. 2013. Truth by fiat: the Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Revista Brasileira de História da Ciência 6(2): 248-266.
Bellac, M. L. 2016. Quantum Physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Beller, M. 1999. Quantum dialogue: the making of a revolution. Chicago & Londres: University of Chicago Press.
Bohm, D. 1952a. A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of “Hidden Variables”. I. Physical Review 85(2): 166-179.
Bohm, D. 1952b. A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of “Hidden Variables”. II. Physical Review 85(2): 180-193.
Bohm, D. 2015. Causalidade e acaso na física moderna. Rio de Janeiro: Contraponto.
Bohr, N. 1961. Atomic Theory and The Description of Nature. 2a edição. Guildford: Billing & Sons.
Bohr, N. 1931. Atomtheorie und Naturbeschreibung. Berlim: Springer.
Bohr, N. 1935. Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete? Physical Review 48: 696-702.
Bohr, N. 2008. Física Atômica e Conhecimento Humano. 3ª reimpressão. Rio de Janeiro: Contraponto.
Bohr, N. 1928. The Quantum Postulate and the Recent Development of Atomic Theory. Nature 121: 580-590.
Boltzmann, L. 2005. Escritos Populares. São Leopoldo: Editora Unisinos.
Bub, J. 1968. The Daneri-Loinger-Prosperi quantum theory of measurement. Il Nuovo Cimento B (1965-1970) 57: 503-520.
Camilleri, K. 2009. Constructing the Myth of the Copenhagen Interpretation. Perspectives on Science 17: 26-57.
Cassirer, E. 1956. Determinism and indeterminism in Modern Physics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Chevalley, C. 1994. Niels Bohr’s Words and the Atlantis of Kantianism. In: J. Faye & H. J. Folse (ed.), Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy, p.33-55. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht: Springer.
Chevalley, C. 1996. Physics as an Art: The German Tradition and the Symbolic Turn in Philosophy, History of Art and Natural Science in the 1920s. In: A. I. Tauber (ed.), The Elusive Synthesis: Aesthetics and Science, p.227-249. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht: Springer.
Chevalley, C. 1999. Why do We Find Bohr Obscure? In: D. Greenberger; W. L. Reiter; A. Zeilinger (eds.), Epistemological and Experimental Perspectives on Quantum Physics, p.59-73. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook. Dordrecht: Springer.
Collodel, M. & Oberheim, E. 2020. Feyerabend’s Formative Years. Volume 1: Feyerabend and Popper. Viena: Springer.
Cushing, J. T. 1996. The Causal Quantum Theory Program. In: J. T. Cushing; A. Fine; S. Goldstein (eds.), Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Theory: An Appraisal, p.1-19. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht: Springer.
Del Santo, F. & Schwarzhans, E. 2021. “Philosophysics” at the University of Vienna: The (pre-)history of foundations of quantum physics in the Viennese cultural context. 2021. https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.05217. Acesso: 09.11.2021.
Feyerabend, P. [1948] 2015. The concept of intelligibility in modern physics. Transl. D. Kuby & E. Oberheim. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 57: 64-66.
Feyerabend, P. [1948] 2016. Der Begriff der Verständlichkeit in der modernen Physik. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 57: 67-69.
Feyerabend, P. [1954a] 2016. Physics and Ontology. In: S. Gattei & J. Agassi (eds.), Physics and Philosophy. Philosophical Papers, Volume 4, p.9-24. Nova York: Cambridge University Press.
Feyerabend, P. [1954b] 2016. Determinism and Quantum Mechanics. In: S. Gattei & J. Agassi (eds.), Physics and Philosophy. Philosophical Papers, Volume 4, p.25-45. Nova York: Cambridge University Press.
Feyerabend, P. 1957. On the Quantum-theory of Measurement. In: S. Körner (ed.), Observation and interpretation. Proceedings of the Ninth Symposium of the Colston Research Society held in the University of Bristol, April 1st-4th, 1957 (Colston papers), p.121-130. Bristol: Academic Press.
Feyerabend, P. [1958a] 2016. Complementarity. In: S. Gattei & J. Agassi (eds.), Physics and Philosophy. Philosophical Papers, Volume 4, p.49-73. Nova York: Cambridge University Press.
Feyerabend, P. [1958b] 1981. An Attempt at a Realistic Interpretation of Experience. In: J. Preston (ed.), Paul K. Feyerabend: Realism, rationalism, and scientific method. Philosophical Papers, Volume 1, p.17-36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Feyerabend, P. [1958c] 2016. Natural Philosophy. In. S. Gattei & J. Agassi (eds.), Physics and Philosophy. Philosophical Papers, Volume 4, p.323-345. Nova York: Cambridge University Press.
Feyerabend, P. 1960a. Professor Bohm’s Philosophy of Nature. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10(40): 321-338.
Feyerabend, P. [1960b] 1999. The Problem of the Existence of Theoretical Entities. In: J. Preston (ed.), Paul K. Feyerabend: Knowledge, Science and Relativism. Philosophical Papers, Volume 3, p.50-77. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Feyerabend, P. [1960c] 1981. On the Interpretation of Scientific Theories. In: J. Preston (ed.), Paul K. Feyerabend: Realism, rationalism, and scientific method. Philosophical Papers, Volume 1, p.37-43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Feyerabend, P. [1961] 1990. Knowledge Without Foundations. In: J. Preston (ed.), Paul K. Feyerabend: Knowledge, Science and Relativism. Philosophical Papers, Volume 3, p.50-77. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Feyerabend, P. [1962] 2016. Problems of Microphysics. In: S. Gattei & J. Agassi (ed.), Physics and Philosophy. Philosophical Papers, Volume 4, p.99-187. Nova York: Cambridge University Press.
Feyerabend, P. [1963] 1999. How to Be a Good Empiricist: A Plea for Tolerance in Matters Epistemological. In: J. Preston (ed.), Paul K. Feyerabend: Knowledge, Science and Relativism. Philosophical Papers, Volume 3, p.78-103. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Feyerabend, P. [1964] 2016. Philosophical Problems of Quantum Theory. In: S. Gattei & J. Agassi (eds.), Physics and Philosophy. Philosophical Papers, Volume 4, p.346-365. Nova York: Cambridge University Press.
Feyerabend, P. 1965a. Eigenart und Wandlungen physikalischer Erkenntnis. Physikalische Blätter 21(5): 197-203. https://doi.org/10.1002/phbl.19650210501
Feyerabend, P. 1965b. Problems of Empiricism. In: R. G. Colodny (ed.), Beyond the Edge of Certainty, p.144-260. Nova Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Feyerabend, P. 1968. On a Recent Critique of Complementarity: Part I. Philosophy of Science Association 35(4): 309-331.
Feyerabend, P. 1969. On a Recent Critique of Complementarity: Part II. Philosophy of Science Association 36(1): 82-105.
Feyerabend, P. [1970] 2016. In Defence of Classical Physics. In: S. Gattei & J. Agassi (eds.), Physics and Philosophy. Philosophical Papers, Volume 4, p.239-267. Nova York: Cambridge University Press.
Feyerabend, P. 1996. Matando o Tempo: uma autobiografia. São Paulo: Editora UNESP.
Fine, A. 1996. On the Interpretation of Bohmian Mechanics. In: J. T. Cushing; A. Fine; S. Goldstein (eds.), Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Theory: An Appraisal, p.231-250. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht: Springer.
Freire Jr., O. 2015. The Quantum Dissidents: Rebuilding the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (1950-1990). Heidelberg: Springer.
Fuchs, C. A. & Peres, A. 2000. Quantum Theory Needs No “Interpretation”. Physics Today 53(3): 70-71.
Heisenberg, W. 1981. The Physical Content of Quantum Kinematics and Mechanics. In: J. A. Wheeler & W. H. Zurek (eds.), Quantum Theory and Measurement, p.62-84. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Howard, D. 1994. What makes a classical concept classical? Toward a reconstruction of Niels Bohr’s philosophy of physics. In: J. Faye & H. J. Folse (eds.), Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy, p.201-229. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht: Springer.
Howard, D. 2013. Quantum Mechanics in Context: Pascual Jordan’s 1936 Anschauliche Quantentheorie. In: M. Badino & J. Navarro (eds.), Research and Pedagogy: a history of quantum physics through its textbooks, p.265-283. Berlim: Edition Open Access.
Jordan, P. 1936. Anschauliche Quantentheorie. Berlim: Springer.
Kojevnikov, A. 2020. The Copenhagen Network The Birth of Quantum Mechanics from a Postdoctoral Perspective. Cham: Springer.
Kuby, D. 2016. Feyerabend’s ‘The concept of intelligibility in modern physics’ (1948). Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 57: 57-63.
Mehra, J. & Rechenberg, H. 1987. The historical development of quantum theory. Volume 5: Erwin Schrödinger and the rise of wave mechanics. Part 1: Schrödinger in Vienna and Zürich 1887-1925. New York/Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
Preston, J. 2020. Paul Feyerabend. In: E. N Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/feyerabend/. Acesso: 08.11.2021.
Schrödinger, E. 1948. Die Besonderheit des Weltbilds der Naturwissenschaft. Acta Physica Austriaca 3(1): 201-245.
Schrödinger, E. 1952a. Are There Quantum Jumps? Part I. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 3(10): 109-123.
Schrödinger, E. 1952b. Are There Quantum Jumps? Part II. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 3(11): 233-242.
Schrödinger, E. 1959. What is life? And other scientific essays. Nova York: Doubleday.
Strien, M. v. 2019. Pluralism and anarchism in quantum physics: Paul Feyerabend’s writings on quantum physics in relation to his general philosophy of Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 80: 72-81.
Strien, M. v. 2020. Bohm’s theory of quantum mechanics and the notion of classicality. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 71: 72-81.
Thirring, H. 1933. Die Wandlung des Begriffssystemes der Physik. In: K. Menger; H. Thirring; G. Nöbeling; H. Mark (eds.), Krise und Neuaufbau in den exakten Wissenschaften, p.15-40. Fünf Wiener Vorträge. Leipzig und Wien: Franz Deuticke.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2022 Rafael Velloso, Antonio Augusto Passos Videira
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Principia http://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/index is licenced under a Creative Commons - Atribuição-Uso Não-Comercial-Não a obras derivadas 3.0 Unported.
Base available in www.periodicos.ufsc.br.
