Vícios epistêmicos, percepção e responsabilidade

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2020v24n3p503

Resumo

.

Biografia do Autor

José Renato Salatiel, UFES

Professor adjunto do Departamento de Filosofia

 

Referências

Ahmed Mohamed clock incident. 2020. In: Wikipedia. Disponível em: https://en.wikipedia. org/wiki/Ahmed_Mohamed_clock_incident. Acesso em: 01 fev. 2020.

Baehr, J. 2010. Epistemic malevolence. Metaphilosophy 41(1-2): 214–234.

Baehr, J. 2011. The inquiring mind: On intellectual virtues and virtue epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Battaly, H. 2008. Virtue epistemology. Philosophy Compass 3(4): 639–663.

Battaly, H. 2014. Varieties of epistemic vice. In: Matheson, J. and Vitz, R. (ed.), The ethics of belief, p.51–76. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Battaly, H. 2017. Testimonial injustice, epistemic vice, and vice epistemology. In: Kidd, I. J.; Medina, J.; and Pohlhaus Jr, G. (ed.), The Routledge Handbook to Epistemic Injustice, p.507–525. New York: Routledge.

Battaly, H. 2019. Vice epistemology has a responsibility problem. Philosophical Issues 29(1): 24–36.

Cassam, Q. 2016. Vice epistemology. The Monist 99: 159-180.

Cassam, Q. 2018. Epistemic insouciance. Journal of Philosophical Research 43: 1–20.

Cassam, Q. 2019. Vices of the mind: from intellectual to the political. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Collins, J. A.; Olson, I. R. 2014. Knowledge is power: how conceptual knowledge transforms visual cognition, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 21(4): 843–60.

Kidd, I. J. 2018. Deep epistemic vices. Journal of Philosophical Research 43: 43–67.

Fodor, J. A. 1983. The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Fricker, M. 2007. Epistemic injustice: power & the ethics of knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fricker, M. 2016. Fault and non-fault responsibility for implicit prejudice: a space for epistemic “agent-regret”. In: Brady, M. S. and Fricker, M. (ed.), The epistemic life of groups. Essays in the Epistemology of Colletives, p.33–50. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hookway, C. 1994. Cognitive virtues and epistemic evaluations. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 2(2): 211–227.

Hookway, C. 2002. Doubt: affective states and the regulation of inquiry. In: Hookway, C. Truth, rationality, and pragmatism: themes from Peirce, p.246–264. Oxford/New York: Clarendon Press.

Hookway, C. 2003. How to be a virtue epistemologist. In: DePaul, M. and Zagzebski, L. (ed.), Intellectual virtue: Perspectives from ethics and epistemology, p.149–60. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

Hookway, C. 2006. Epistemology and inquiry: the primacy of practice. In: Hetherington, S. (ed.), Epistemology Futures, p.95–110. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

Levin, D. T. & Banaji, M. R. Distortions in the perceived lightness of faces: the role of race categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 135(4): 501–512.

Macpherson, F. 2012. Cognitive penetration of color experience: rethinking the issue in light of an indirect mechanism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84(1): 24–62.

Macpherson, F. 2015. Cognitive penetration and predictive coding: a commentary on Lupyan. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 6: 571–584.

Medina, J. 2013. The epistemology of resistance: gender and racial oppression, epistemic injustice, and the social imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Payne, K. B. 2001. Prejudice and perception: The role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81(2): 181–192.

Pylyshyn, Z. W. 1985. Computation and cognition: toward a foundation for Cognitive Science. 2nd Edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Pylyshyn, Z. W. 2003. Seeing and visualizing: It’s not what you think. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Raftopoulos, A. 2019. Cognitive penetrability and the epistemic role of perception. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.

Salatiel, J. R. 2020. O problema da penetrabilidade cognitiva da percepção: um caso de vício intelectual? Kriterion 61(147) [em edição].

Sher, G. 2006. In praise of blame. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Siegel, S. 2011. Cognitive penetrability and perceptual justification. Noûs 46(2): 1–22.

Siegel, S. 2012. The epistemic impact of the etiology of experience. Philosophical Studies 162(3): 697-722.

Siegel, S. 2017. The rationality of perception. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Silins, N. 2016. Cognitive penetration and the epistemology of perception. Philosophy Compass 11(1): 24–42.

Sosa, E. 1991. Knowledge in perspective: selected essays in Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Stokes, D. 2013. Cognitive penetrability of perception. Philosophy Compass 8(7): 646–663.

Zagzebski, L. T. 1996. Virtues of the mind: An inquiry into the nature of virtue and the ethical foundations of knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Publicado

2020-12-15

Edição

Seção

Artigos