Cognition as Communication: Exploring Niklas Luhmann's Theory of Knowledge

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2025.e97853

Palabras clave:

Luhmann, Epistemology, Cognition, Environment, Observation

Resumen

This article delves into the epistemology inherent in Niklas Luhmann's theory of social systems, specifically focusing on the concept of cognition. The research question centers on how cognition functions within Luhmann’s theoretical framework, understood as a self-referential process in operationally closed systems. Luhmann argues that cognition emerges through layered observations, including observations of prior observations and recursive self-reflection. By situating Luhmann within the constructivist paradigm, the article contrasts his radical constructivism with other approaches and addresses critiques of his stance, particularly regarding the ontological implications of his epistemology. Drawing on frameworks such as poststructuralist correlationism, the article provides an introduction to Luhmann’s epistemological contributions while analyzing their broader philosophical relevance. Through conceptual elucidation and comparative analysis, it highlights how Luhmann’s sociological framework challenges foundational assumptions in epistemology and invites renewed reflection on the nature of knowledge and cognition.

Citas

Bertilsson, M. 1998. Socialkonstruktivisme: Et erkendelsessociologisk perspektiv. In: M. Järvinen; M. Bertilsson (ed.), Socialkonstruktivisme, bidrag til en kritisk diskussion, pp. 17-40. København: Hans Reitzels forlag.

Bryant, L. 2011. The Democracy of Objects. Michigan: Open Humanities Press.

Bryant, L. 2016. For realist systems theory: Luhmann, the correlationist controversy. From the anthology Genealogies of speculation, edited by Armen Avanessian & Suhail Malik. London: Bloomsbury Pub. Plc.

Collin, F. 2021. Socialkonstruktivisme - En introduktion. København: Samfundslitteratur.

Derrida, J. 1992. Force of law: The mystical foundation of authority. In: D. G. Carlson; D. Cornell; M. Rosenfeld (ed.), Deconstruction and the possibility of justice, p.3-67. London: Routledge.

Foerster, H. v. 1995. Ethics and second-order cybernetics. SEHR 4(2): 308-319.

Harste, G. 2021. The Habermas – Luhmann Debate. New York: Colombia University Press.

Hegel, G. W. F. 1999. Åndens fenomenologi. Oslo: Pax Forlag A/S.

Heider, F. 1959. On Perception and Event Structure, and the Psychological Environment. Psychological issues 1(3): 1-34.

Jönhill, J. I. 1997. Samhället som system och dess ekologiska omväld. Lund: Sociologiska institutionen, Lunds Universitet.

Kant, I. 2002. Kritik af den rene fornuft. Frederiksberg: Det lille forlag.

Latour, B. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Latour, B. 2017. Facing Gaia: Eight Lectures on the New Climatic Regime. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Luhmann, N. 1988. Erkenntnis als Konstruktion. Bern: Benteli Verlag.

Luhmann, N. 1990. Essays on Self-Reference. New York: Columbia University Press.

Luhmann, N. 1992. Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Luhmann, N. 1994. The Modernity of Science. New German Critique, Special Issue on Niklas Luhmann, 61: 9-23.

Luhmann, N. 1995a. Social Systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Luhmann, N. 1995b. Why “Systems Theory”? in Cybernetics & Hwnan Knowing vol. 3, no. 2, 1995.

Luhmann, N. 1998. European Rationality. In: Observations on Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Luhmann, N. 2000a. Art as a Social System. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Luhmann, N. 2000b. The Reality of the Mass Media. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Luhmann, N. 2002a. What is Communication. In: Redescribing the descriptions of modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Luhmann, N. 2002b. The Cognitive Program of Constructivism and the Reality That Remains Unknown. In: W. Rasch (ed.), Theories of Distinction: Redescribing the Descriptions of Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Luhmann, N. 2005. Risk – A Sociological Theory. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Aldine Transaction.

Luhmann, N. 2012. Theory of Society. Vol. 1 & 2. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Maturana, H. R. & Varela F. 1980. Autopoiesis and cognition: The reallization of the living. London: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

Meillassoux, Q. 2008. After Finitude: An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency. London: Continuum Books.

Moeller, H-G. 2012. The Radical Luhmann. New York: Columbia University Press.

Spencer-Brown, G. 1969. Laws of form. London: George Allen and Unwin.

Teubner, G. 1993. Autopoiesis and Steering: How Politics Profits from the Normative Surplus of Capitalism. In R. Kevelson (ed.), Law and Semiotics, vol.6, p.51-77. New York: Springer.

Tække, J. 2013. Er talesprog en medieteknologi? – Niklas Luhmanns teknologibegreb i anvendelse. In: K. Schiølin; S. Riis (ed.), Nye spørgsmål til teknikken.Aarhus: Århus Universitetsforlag.

Tække, J. 2022a. Algorithmic Differentiation of Society – a Luhmann Perspective on the Societal Impact of Digital Media. Journal of Sociocybernetics 18(1).

Tække, J. 2022b, Systems-theoretical observations of moral media panic debates. Kybernetes 51(5): 1724-1737. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-11-2020-0724

Tække, J. 2024. From Media Evolution to the Anthropocene: Unpacking Socio-technical Autopoiesis. Systems Research and Behavioral Science: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.3009.

Tække, J. 2025. Sociological Perspectives on AI, Intelligence and Communication. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 42(2): 574-584. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.3123

Publicado

2025-10-24

Número

Sección

Articles