Comparison between two generations to verify the morphological changes in female futsal athletes in a period of 10 years

Marcos Roberto Queiroga; Sandra Aires Ferreira; Timothy Gustavo Cavazzotto; Bruno Sergio Portela; Marcus Peikriszwili Tartaruga; Matheus Amarante do Nascimento; Danilo Fernandes da Silva

doi:10.1590/1980-0037.2019v21e56970

Autores

Marcos Roberto Queiroga Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9284-976X
Sandra Aires Ferreira Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4491-2485
Timothy Gustavo Cavazzotto Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9813-6149
Bruno Sergio Portela Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8751-9811
Marcus Peikriszwili Tartaruga Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1173-2816
Matheus Amarante do Nascimento Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4677-8956
Danilo Fernandes da Silva Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4170-1079

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-0037.2019v21e56970

Resumo

O objetivo foi comparar duas gerações para verificar as alterações morfológicas em atletas de futsal feminino. Idade, tempo de treino, medidas antropométricas, percentual de gordura e somatotipo foram comparadas entre atletas profissionais de 2001 (n=112) e 2011 (n=115). A geração de 2011 demonstrou significativamente maior tempo de prática (9,0±4,3 vs 5,7±3,5 anos; p<0,001), espessura da dobra cutânea da coxa (26,1±8,5 vs 22,5±6,7 mm; p<0,001), circunferência de braço contraído (27,4±2,1 vs 26,7±2,1 cm; p=0,007), mesomorfia (4,1 vs 3,3; p=0,001) e menor espessura da dobra cutânea supraespinhal (14,0±5,0 vs 19,1± 7,4mm; p<0,001), relação tronco/extremidade (0,8±0,3 vs 1,1±0,1; p<0,001) e endomorfia (4,5 vs 5,0; p=0,009) do que as atletas de 2001. A comparação de acordo com a posição em quadra revelou que as goleiras (9,5±5,0 vs 6,3±3,4 anos; p=0,027) alas (9,0±4,3 vs 5,4±3,2 anos; p=0,001) e fixos (8,4±4,3 vs 6,9±4,5 anos; p=0,001) de 2011, apresentaram maior tempo de prática do que as atletas de 2001, enquanto o perfil somatotipológico das goleiras (4,6±1,0 vs 3,4±1,1; p=0,001), alas (3,9±0,8 vs 3,0±0,9; p=0,001), pivôs (3,8±1,0 vs 3,4±1,0; p=0,028) e fixos (4,3±0,9 vs 3,7±1,0; p=0,036) apresentou maior mesomorfia do que as atletas de 2001, respectivamente. Conclui-se que o grupo de 2011 demonstrou maior tempo de prática e taxas de mesomorfia, além de menor endomorfia comparado às atletas de 2001.

Referências

Confederação Brasileira de Futsal/CBFS. Available from: <http://www.cbfs.com.br> [2015, march 17].

Moore R, Radford J. Is futsal kicking off in England? A baseline participation study of futsal. Am J Sports Sci Med 2014;2(3):117-122.

Barbero-Alvarez JC, Soto VM, Barbero-Alvarez V, Granda-Vera J. Match analysis and heart rate of futsal players during competition. J Sports Sci 2008;26(1):63-73.

Queiroga MR, Ferreira SA, Pereira G, Kokubun E. Somatotype and performance in female futsal players. Rev Bras Cineantropom Desempenho Hum 2008;10(1):56-61.

Moore R, Bullough S, Goldsmith, S, Edmondson L. A systematic review of futsal literature. Am J Sports Sci Med 2014;2(3):108-116.

Slater GJ, Rice AJ, Mujika I, Hahn AG, Sharpe K, Jenkins DG. Physique traits of lightweight rowers and their relationship to competitive success. Br J Sports Med 2005;39(10):736-41.

Claessens AL, Lefevre J, Beunen G, Malina RM. The contribution of anthropometric characteristics to performance scores in elite female gymnasts. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 1999;39(4):355-60.

Claessens AL, Hlatky S, Lefevre J, Holdhaus H. The role of anthropometric characteristics in modern pentathlon performance in female athletes. J Sports Sci 1994;12(4):391-401.

Cech P, Maly T, Mala L, Zahalka F. Body composition of elite youth pentathletes and its gender differences. Sport Sci 2013;6(2):29‐35.

Marfell-Jones M, Olds T, Stewart A, Carter L. International standards for anthropometric assessment. Sydney: UNSW Press, 2006.

Jackson AS, Pollock ML, Ward A. Generalized equations for predicting body density of women. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1980;12(3):175-81.

Siri WE. Body composition from fluid spaces and density: analysis of methods. In: Brozek J, Henschel A. Techniques for measuring body composition. National Academy of Sciences, 223-224, 1961.

Carter JEL, Health BH. Somatotyping: Development and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

Duquet W, Hebbelinck M. Application of the somatotype attitudinal distance to the study of group and individual somatotype status and relations. In: Eiben O (Eds). Growth and Development: Physique. Budapest: Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 377-384, 1977.

Espirito-Santo H, Daniel F. Calculating and reporting effect sizes on scientific papers (1): p<0.05 limitations in the analysis of mean differences of two groups. Port J Behav Social Res 2015;1(1):3-16.

Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2a ed. New York: Psychology Press, 1988.

Carter JEL. The Heath-Carter anthropometric somatotype -instruction manual, 2002:26p. Available from: <http://www.somatotype.org/Heath-CarterManual.pdf> [2003, March 25].

Can F, Yilmaz I, Erden Z. Morphological characteristics and performance variables of women soccer players. J Strength Cond Res 2004;18(3):480-5.

Withers RT, Whittingham NO, Norton KI, Dutton M. Somatotypes of south Australian female games players. Hum Biol 1987;59(4):575-84.

Adhikari A, Nugent J. Anthropometric characteristic, body composition and somatotype of Canadian female soccer players. Am J Sports Sci Med 2014;2(61):14-18.

Bayios IA, Bergeles NK, Apostolidis NG, Noutsos KS, Koskolou MD. Anthropometric, body composition and somatotype differences of Greek elite female basketball, volleyball and handball players. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2006;46(2):271-80.

Kooshakia F, Nikbakhtb M, Habibi A. Relationship between body composition profile and basic futsal skills in elite female futsal players. Health, Safety and Environment 2014;3(4):1-5.

Giusti ML, Ferreira GF, Morschbacher M, David GB, Xavier MO, Morales MSB, et al. Anthropometric profile of futsal team ladies the Catholic University Pelotas. Braz J Futsal Football 2012;4(11):38-41.

Costa CSC, Palma A, Porto CPM, Pierucci AP. Female futsal players profile and biochemical alterations through intermittent high-intensity exercise training. Food Nutri Sci 2012;3:110-116.

Davis JA, Brewer J. Physiological characteristics of an international female soccer squad. J Sports Sci 1992;10(2):142-143.

Nikolaidis PT. Physical fitness in female soccer players by playing position: focus on anaerobic power. Hum Mov 2014;15(2):74-79.

Berdejo-del-Fresno D, Laupheimer MW. Recovery & regeneration behaviours in elite english futsal players. Am J Sports Sci Med 2014;2(3):77-82.

Benvenuti C, Minganti C, Condello G, Capranica L, Tessitore A. Agility assessment in female futsal and soccer players. Medicina (Kaunas) 2010;46(6):415-20.

Taveira LM, Ladeia HA, Barbosa GL, Souza PRC, Abreu CO, Fidelis AJM, et al. Alteração da regra de utilização do goleiro-linha ocorrida em janeiro de 2011: Implicações técnico-táticas. Coleç Pesq Educ Fís 2013;12(4):33-40.

Queiroga MR, Ferreira SA, Romanzini M. Anthropometric profile of elite athletes of women’s futsal according to tactical function in the game. Rev Bras Cineantropom Desempenho Hum 2005;7(1):30-34.

Comparação entre duas gerações para verificar as alterações morfológicas em atletas de futsal feminino em um período de 10 anos

Autores

DOI:

Resumo

Referências

Downloads

Publicado

Edição

Seção

Licença

Idioma

Enviar Submissão