Graded and ramp protocols present similar results in apparently healthy subjects

Authors

Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare maximum oxygen uptake, maximum heart rate, speed corresponding to VO2max, time to exhaustion, and ventilatory thresholds between two maximal test protocols (scaled vs ramp) with equalized metabolic demand in apparently healthy young adults. Twenty-seven subjects of both sexes were analyzed and submitted to two maximum tests: 1) scaled test with 1.2 km?h-1 every 2 min; 2) ramp test with 0.1 km?h-1 every 0.18 min; both with 1% slope and maximum total duration of twenty minutes. Respiratory gas exchanges were directly analyzed, and ventilatory thresholds determined through visual inspection. Central tendency and dispersion measures were adopted, as well as paired t-test and effect size. Bland-Altman analysis verified the agreement among variables. Maximum speed showed significance difference (p < 0.01) for the scaled test (14.0 ± 1.9 km?h-1) and ramp test (14.6 ± 2.3 km?h-1). Even with small BIAS values, negative trend and high limits of agreement could be observed. Despite the non-difference presented for variables, except for maximum speed, it could be concluded that the scaled test is able to determine the analyzed variables similar to the ramp test, considering the same conditions of the present study.

Author Biographies

Thiago Barbosa Lima, Federal University of Pernambuco

Federal University of Pernambuco. Recife, PE. Brazil

Tony Meireles Santos, Federal University of Pernambuco

Federal University of Pernambuco. Recife, PE. Brazil

Vinicius de Oliveira Damasceno, Federal University of Pernambuco

Federal University of Pernambuco. Recife, PE. Brazil

Eduado Zapaterra Campos, Federal University of Pernambuco

Federal University of Pernambuco. Recife, PE. Brazil

References

ACSM. ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. 10 ed. Philadelphia Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Health; 2017. 472 p.

Arena R, Myers J, Williams MA, Gulati M, Kligfield P, Balady GJ, et al. Assessment of functional capacity in clinical and research settings: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Exercise, Rehabilitation, and Prevention of the Council on Clinical Cardiology and the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing. Circulation 2007;116(3):329-43.

Beltz NM, Gibson AL, Janot JM, Kravitz L, Mermier CM, Dalleck LC. Graded Exercise Testing Protocols for the Determination of VO2max: Historical Perspectives, Progress, and Future Considerations. J Sports Med 2016;2016:3968393.

Boone J, Bourgois J. The oxygen uptake response to incremental ramp exercise: methodogical and physiological issues. Sports Med 2012;42(6):511-26.

Stringer WW. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing: current applications. Expert Rev Respir Med 2010;4(2):179-88.

Poole DC, Jones AM. Measurement of the maximum oxygen uptake Vo2max: Vo2peak is no longer acceptable. J Appl Physiol 2017;122(4):997-1002.

Balke B, Ware RW. An experimental study of physical fitness of Air Force personnel. U S Armed Forces Med J 1959;10(6):675-88.

Ellestad MH, Allen W, Wan MC, Kemp GL. Maximal treadmill stress testing for cardiovascular evaluation. Circulation 1969;39(4):517-22.

Bruce RA. Exercise testing of patients with coronary heart disease. Principles and normal standards for evaluation. Ann Clin Res 1971;3(6):323-32.

Kuipers H, Rietjens G, Verstappen F, Schoenmakers H, Hofman G. Effects of stage duration in incremental running tests on physiological variables. Int J Sports Med 2003;24(7):486-91.

Downloads

Published

2020-11-10

Issue

Section

Original Articles