Computing Culture Beyond Normativity: Participations and Productions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9584-2021v29n260462Abstract
Computing area can be considered a normative space within gender perspective and despite its social dissemination and the recent gender problematizations that are occurring in the area, discussions about exclusion, invisibility and erasure of historical figures are still incipient issues. Following this reflection, this article intends to question computing culture as constructed by normative people, approaching these questions in a participatory way to promote speech and acting spaces that are related to cultural, practical and philosophical changes in the computing area. These discussions took place in participative workshops where were developed two artifacts as unfolding to promote visibility of historical figures that are disregarded by the normative computing culture, the presentation of computing concepts in a non-gendered way, fomenting debates about gender in computing area.
Downloads
References
ADAMS, Ernest. Fundamentals of game design. Berkeley: Pearson Education, 2010.
BARDZELL, Shaowen. “Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an Agenda for Design”. In: CHI 2010: HCI FOR ALL. 2010, Atlanta-USA. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Nova Iorque: Association for Computing Machinery, 2010. p. 1301-1310. Disponível em http://wtf.tw/ref/bardzell.pdf. Acesso em 10/11/2018.
BARDZELL, Shaowen. “Utopias of Participation: Feminism, Design, and the Futures”. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Nova Iorque, v. 25, n. 1, p. 1-24, fev. 2018. Disponível em https://doi.org/10.1145/3127359. Acesso em 13/11/2018.
BARDZELL, Shaowen; BARDZELL, Jeffrey. Humanistic HCI: synthesis lectures on Human-Centered Informatics. San Rafael: Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2015. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.2200/S00664ED1V01Y201508HCI031
BILIMORIA, Diana; STEWART, Abigail J. “‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’: The Academic Climate for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Faculty in Science and Engineering”. NWSA Journal, Baltimore, v. 21, n. 2, p. 85-103, nov. 2009. Disponvel em https://www.jstor.org/stable/20628175?seq=1. Acesso em 13/11/2018.
BØDKER, Susanne; KYNG, Morten. “Participatory Design that Matters - Facing the Big Issues”. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Nova Iorque, v. 25, n. 1, p. 1-31, fev. 2018. Disponível em https://doi.org/10.1145/3152421. Acesso em 13/11/2018.
CASTELINI, Pricila. Mulheres na computação: percepções, memórias e participação de estudantes e egressas. 2018. Mestrado em Tecnologia e Sociedade - Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brasil. Disponível em http://repositorio.utfpr.edu.br:8080/jspui/handle/1/2944. Acesso em 20/11/2018.
CECH, Erin A.; WAIDZUNAS, Tom J. “Navigating the heteronormativity of engineering: the experiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual students”. Engineering Studies, Londres, v. 3-1, p. 1-24, fev. 2011. Disponível em https://doi.org/10.1080/19378629.2010.545065. Acesso em 20/11/2018.
COUTO, Luis Flávio Silva; SOUZA, Marcelo Fonseca Gomer de. “O estruturalismo em Jacques Lacan: da apropriação à subversão da corrente estruturalista no estabelecimento de uma teoria do sujeito do inconsciente”. Ágora, Rio de Janeiro, v. XVI, n. 2, p. 185-200, jul. 2013. Disponível em http://www.scielo.br/pdf/agora/v16n2/v16n2a01.pdf. Acesso em 04/12/2018.
DE LAURETIS, Teresa. Technologies of gender: Essays on Essays on theory, film, and fiction. Indiana: Indiana University Press, 1987.
GROGAN, Abi. “‘It’s never good to carry a secret…’. Findings of the E&T magazine lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) survey”. Engineering & Technology, v. 9, ed. 7, p. 40-42. ago. 2014. Disponível em https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=6882921. Acesso em 04/10/2018.
HARRISON, Steve; TATAR, Deborah; SENGERS, Phoebe. “The three paradigms of HCI”. In: CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS (Alt. Chi. Session). 2007. p. 1-18. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/215835951_The_three_paradigms_of_HCI.
HIRATA, Helena; KERGOAT, Danièle. “Novas configurações da divisão sexual do trabalho”. Cadernos de Pesquisa, v. 37, n. 132, p. 595-609, set. 2007. Disponível em https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0100-15742007000300005&script=sci_abstract&tlng=pt. Acesso em 01/11/2020.
HUGHES, Thomas P. “The seamless web: technology, science, etcetera, etcetera”. Social Studies of Science, v. 16, n. 2, p. 281-292, 1986. Disponível em http://www.jstor.org/stable/285206. Acesso em 01/11/2020.
JUNGK, Robert; MÜLLERT, Norbert. Future Workshops: How to create desirable futures. Londres: Institute of Social Inventions, 1987.
LEAVITT, David. O homem que sabia demais: Alan Turing e a invenção do computador. Ribeirão Preto: Novo Conceito, 2006.
LIGHT, Ann. “HCI as Heterodoxy: Technologies of Identity and the Queering of Interaction with Computers”. Interacting with Computers, v. 23, n. 5, p. 430-438, set. 2011.
LIMA, Michelle Pinto. “As mulheres na Ciência da Computação”. Revista Estudos Feministas, Florianópolis, v. 21, n. 3, p. 793-816, set. 2013. Disponível em https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-026X2013000300003. Acesso em 11/11/2018.
MARTINS, Maria do Carmo. “Ada Lovelace: a primeira programadora da história”. Correio dos Açores, Açores, p. 14, jul. 2016. Disponível em https://repositorio.uac.pt/bitstream/10400.3/4025/1/Ada-Lovelace-28-julho-2016-%28digitalizacao-CA%29.pdf. Acesso em 21/11/2018.
MERKLE, Luiz Ernesto; AMARAL, Marília Abrahão. “O espectro de uma terceira onda: questões e desafios da educação formal em IHC em uma instituição brasileira”. In: IV WORKSHOP SOBRE ENSINO DE IHC (WEIHC 2013), 4, 2013, Manaus, 2013, p. 19-24. Disponível em https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9d50/084648cebd6cee7189892f87dd47d2c87bd1.pdf?_ga=2.42078380.829978364.1539715405-1589682503.1539715405. Acesso em 16/10/2018.
MULLER, Michael J.; HASLWANTER, Jean Hallewell; DAYTON, Tom. “Participatory Practices in the Software Lifecycle”. In: HELANDER, Martin G.; LANDAUER, Thomas K.; PRABHU, Prasad V. (Eds.). Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction. Amsterdã: Elsevier Science, 1997. p. 255-297.
PAAR, Christof; PELZL, Jean. Understanding Cryptography: A Textbook for Students and Practitioners. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2010.
PEDRO, Joana Maria. “Relações de gênero como categoria transversal na historiografia contemporânea”. Topoi, Rio de Janeiro, v. 12, n. 22, p. 270-283, jan. 2011. Disponível em https://www.scielo.br/pdf/topoi/v12n22/1518-3319-topoi-12-22-00270.pdf. Acesso em 26/11/2020.
ROGERS, Yvonne. HCI theory: classical, modern, and contemporary. San Rafael: Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2012.
SABOYA, Maria Clara Lopes. Alunas de engenharia elétrica e ciência da computação: estudar, inventar, resistir. 2009. Doutorado em Educação - Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil. Disponível em http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/48/48134/tde-15092009-153720/ptbr.php. Acesso em 13/11/2018.
SANZ, Beatriz. “Quem são as cientistas negras brasileiras?”. El País Brasil [online], São Paulo, 2017. Disponível em https://brasil.elpais.com/brasil/2017/02/24/ciencia/1487948035_323512.html. Acesso em 01/07/2020.
SÁNZ, Verónica. “Género en el ‘contenido’ de la tecnología: ejemplos en el diseño de software”. Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad, Buenos Aires, v. 11, n. 31, 2016. Disponível em http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S185000132016000100006. Acesso em 13/11/2018.
SPINUZZI, Clay. “A Scandinavian challenge, a US response: methodological assumptions in Scandinavian and US prototyping approaches”. In: CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION, 20, 2002, Nova Iorque, Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference on Computer Documentation. Nova Iorque: Association for Computing Machinery, 2002. p. 208-215. Disponível em https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/584955.584986. Acesso em 10/11/2018.
STAR, Susan Leigh. “Power, Technology and the Phenomenology of Conventions”. In: LAW, John (Org.). A Sociology of Monsters. London: Routledge, 1991.
STOUT, Jane G.; WRIGHT, Heather M. “Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Students’ Sense of Belonging in Computing: An Intersectional Approach”. Computing in Science & Engineering, v. 18, n. 3, p. 24-30, 2016. Disponível em https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2016.45. Acesso em 11/10/2018.
TRENSHAW, Kathryn F.; HETRICK, Ashley; OSWALD, Ramona F.; VOSTRAL, Sharra L.; LOUI, Michael C. “Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Students in Engineering: Climate and Perceptions”. In: 43rd IEEE ANNUAL FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE (FIE), 43, 2013, Oklahoma. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, Oklahoma, p. 1238-1240, 2013.
VIDAL, Rene Victor Valqui. “The Future Workshop: Democratic problem solving”. Economic Analysis Working Papers (2002-2010). Atlantic Review of Economics (2011-2016), Colexio de Economistas de A Coruña, Spain and Fundación Una Galicia Moderna, v. 5, p. 1-25, 2006. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/46542051_The_Future_Workshop_Democratic_problem_solving.
WAJCMAN, Judy. El tecnofeminismo. Madrid: Ediciones Cátedra, 2006.
WAJCMAN, Judy. “Feminist theories of technology”. Cambridge Journal of Economics, v. 34, ed. 1., p. 143-152, jan. 2010. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/ben057.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Estudos Feministas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Revista Estudos Feministas is under the Creative Commons International 4.0 Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), that allows sharing the work with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
The license allows:
Sharing (copying and redistributing the material in any support or format) and/or adapting (remixing, transforming, and creating from the material) for any purpose, even if commercial.
The licensor cannot revoke these rights provided the terms of the license are respected. The terms are the following:
Attribution – you should give the appropriate credit, provide a link to the license and indicate if changes were made. This can be done in several ways without suggesting that the licensor has approved of the use.
Without additional restrictions – You cannot apply legal terms or technological measures that prevent others from doing something allowed by the license.
