Cyborg literacies: an anarchic, paradigmatic, and posthuman reading of digital literacy and artificial intelligence literacy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1807-9288.2026.e109519Keywords:
Digital Literacy, Artificial Intelligence Literacy, Cyborg Literacy, Posthumanism, Basic educationAbstract
This article addresses the concepts of Digital Literacy and Artificial Intelligence Literacy, proposing Cyborg Literacy as an anarchic and posthuman interpretation of these educational practices. Methodologically, the study is grounded in bibliographic review and conceptual analysis. The discussion begins with the understanding that Digital Literacy, consolidated in recent decades as a social practice oriented toward criticality and multimodal competence, encounters limitations considering the transformations brought about by the emergence of generative artificial intelligences. Artificial Intelligence Literacy thus emerges as an ethical and pedagogical response, seeking to integrate AI into educational processes in a critical, responsible, and sustainable manner. However, by maintaining the human as the center of knowledge and decision-making, it still reproduces the anthropocentric ontology that structures modern thought. Drawing on contributions from authors such as Kuhn (2013), Feyerabend (2007), Haraway (2000), Hayles (1999), Marchesini (2010), Latour (2021), and XXX (2024; 2025), it is argued that contemporary literacy practices demand an epistemological revision that recognizes cognition as a phenomenon distributed among humans and non-humans. It is concluded that Cyborg Literacy not only expands the scope of previous literacies but also inaugurates a way of thinking about education as an ecology of intelligences, in which learning implies corresponding and coexisting with the other, biological or machinic, within a network of interdependent social practices.
References
BARAD, Karen. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke University Press, 2007.
BAWDEN, D. Origins and concepts of digital literacy. New York: Peter Lang, 2008. p. 17-32.
BENNETT, J. Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2010.
BRAIDOTTI, Rosi. The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013.
REDA, R; TORRENTES, G. C. Letramento em IA: confluência entre letramentos digitais, críticos e práticas de interação com tecnologias generativas. Texto Digital, Florianópolis, v. 21, n. 1, 2025. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/textodigital/article/view/106803. Acesso em 24 out. 2025.
BUZATO, M. E. K. Letramentos digitais e formação de professores. São Paulo: Portal Educarede. 2006. Disponível em: http://www.unilago.com.br/arquivosdst/24983MarceloBuzato%20-%20letramento%20digital%20e%20formacao%20de%20profs%20@.pdf. Acesso em: 24 de out. 2025.
CESARINI, P. Computers, technology and literacies. Journal of Literacy and Technology, v. 4, 2004. Disponível em: http://www.literacyandtechnology.org/v4/pfvs/pfv_cesarini.htm. Acesso em: 10 maio 2006.
DI FELICE, M. A cidadania digital: a crise da ideia ocidental de democracia e a participação nas redes sociais. São Paulo: Paulus, 2020.
DQ INSTITUTE. DQ Global Standards Microcredentials (GSM): A Global Interoperable Codification of Digital Skills for AI and Sustainability. 2023. Disponível em: https://www.dqinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/DQ-GSMWhitepaper.pdf. Acesso em: 28 jan. 2025.
DUDENEY, G.; HOCKLY, N.; PEGRUM, M. Letramentos digitais. Tradução: Marcos Marcionilo. São Paulo: Parábola Editorial, 2016.
FEYERABEND, Paul. Contra o método. 3. ed. São Paulo: Unesp, 2007.
FREITAS, M. T. Letramento digital e formação de professores. Educação em Revista, Belo Horizonte, v. 26, n. 3, p. 335-352, dez. 2010. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/j/edur/a/N5RryXJcsTcm8wK56d3tM3t/?lang=pt. Acesso em: 24 de out. 2025.
GILSTER, P. Digital literacy. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1997.
HARAWAY, D. A Cyborg manifesto: science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. Socialist Review, 15(2), 65-108, 1985, (Trad. Bras. Tomaz Tadeu. In D. Haraway, H. Kunzru & T. Tadeu, Antropologia do ciborgue: as vertigens do pós-humano (p. 65-108). Belo Horizonte: Autêntica, 2000).
HAYLES, N. Katherine. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1999.
KUHN, Thomas S. A estrutura das revoluções científicas. 12. ed. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 2013.
LATOUR, B. Jamais fomos modernos: ensaio de antropologia simétrica (2ª ed.). Rio de Janeiro: Editora 34, 2021.
LEE, K. Inteligência artificial: como os robôs estão mudando o mundo, a forma como amamos, nos relacionamos, trabalhamos e vivemos. Tradução de Marcelo Barbão. 1 ed. Rio de Janeiro: Globo Livros, 2019.
MARCHESINI, R. Contra a pureza essencialista, rumo a novos modelos de existência. In M. PIREDDU; M. DI FELICE (Orgs.), Pós-humanismo: as relações entre o humano e a técnica na época das redes (p. 163-183). São Caetano do Sul: Difusão Editora, 2010.
MEY, J. L. As vozes da sociedade: letramento, consciência e poder. Tradução de Maria da Glória de Morais. DELTA, v. 14, n. 2, p. 331-338. 1998.
PENNYCOOK, Alastair. Posthumanist Applied Linguistics. London: Routledge, 2018.
RIBEIRO, A. E. F. Navegar lendo, ler navegando. Notas sobre a leitura de jornais impressos e digitais. Belo Horizonte: InterDitado, 2009. (Coleção Indie).
ROCHE, Thomas Bernard. Assessing the role of digital literacy in English for Academic Purposes university pathway programs. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, [S. l.], v. 11, n. 1, p. A71-A87, 2017. Disponível em: https://journal.aall.org.au/index.php/jall/article/view/439. Acesso em: 24 oct. 2025.
ROJO, R. Letramentos Múltiplos, Escola e Inclusão Social. São Paulo: Parábola Editorial, 2009.
SANTAELLA, L. Humanos hiper-híbridos: linguagens e cultura na segunda era da internet. São Paulo: Paulus, 2021. Coleção Comunicação.
SCHMIDT, E. HUTTENLOCHER, D. KISSINGER, H. A Era da IA. Alta Curt Editora. Rio de Janeiro, 2023.
SELFE, C. L. Technology and literacy in the twenty-first century: the importance of paying attention. Chicago: Southern Illinois University Pres, 1999.
STREET, B. Literacy in theory and practice. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
SOARES, M. Novas práticas de leitura e escrita: letramento na cibercultura. Educação e Sociedade, Campinas, v. 23, n. 81, p. 143-160, dez. 2002.
SOUZA, V. V. Soares. Letramento digital e formação de professores. Revista Língua Escrita, n. 2, p. 55-69, dez. 2007.
UNESCO. Recomendação sobre a ética da inteligência artificial. Paris: Organização das Nações Unidas para a Educação, a Ciência e a Cultura, 2022. Disponível em: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137_por. Acesso em: 17 jan. 2025.
UNESCO. Marco referencial de competências em IA para estudantes. Paris: UNESCO, 2025a. Disponível em: https://www.unesco.org/pt/articles/marco-referencial-de-competencias-em-ia-para-estudantes. Acesso em: 27 jan. 2025.
UNESCO. Marco referencial de competências em IA para professores. Paris: UNESCO, 2025b. Disponível em: https://www.unesco.org/pt/articles/marco-referencial-de-competencias-em-ia-para-professores. Acesso em: 27 jan. 2025.
XAVIER, A. C. Letramento digital: impacto das tecnologias na aprendizagem da Geração Y. Calidoscópio. Disponível em: https://www.professores.uff.br/screspo/wp-content/uploads/sites/127/2017/09/PSI_P2_artigo8.pdf. Acesso em: 23 out 2025.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Renan Monezi Lemes

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who have their works published in Texto Digital agree that:
Copyrights remain with the authors, who grant the journal the right of first publishing their submitted manuscripts. All materials published by the journalare under an Attribution 4.0 International - Creative Commons License, which allows them to be shared since authorship and first publication credits are mentioned.
The Attribution 4.0 International - Creative Commons allows the copy and redistribution of the material in any medium or format, as well as its adaptation for any purpose, even commercially.
Authors can take additional contracts for non-exclusive distribution of the version of their works published by our journal separately (e.g. to publish it in an institutional repository or as a book chapter) with both expressed authorship acknowledgment and Texto Digital’s first publication credit.
