A formal proposal for the reanalysis of the verb ir in Brazilian Portuguese: from lexical to functional

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/1984-8420.2021.e76112

Abstract

Some authors have already showed that the Romance futurity expression went by a cyclic process, alternating between a synthetic form and a periphrastic one. This is due to the reanalysis of some item that becomes (more) functional, replacing the synthetic form. In this sense, this paper investigates the reanalysis phenomenon of verb ir, aiming to capture the syntactic changes this item went by on BP history. Therefore, we analyze Brazilian roles from the 16th to the 21st century. We show that the verb ir behaved as a lexical verb, conveying spatial displacement, initially. Later, such verb was reanalyzed and became more functional, behaving like an auxiliary. The innovation of the present study is to show that verb ir did not go by a reanalysis directly to convey futurity, a potential event. Instead, there seems to have been a previous step in that process, where ir conveys prospection, i.e., an action that happens immediately after the speech. Assuming Roberts and Roussou (2003) and Roberts (2007), we propose that two syntactic consequences have arisen from lexical to functional verb: lose of formal features and an upward functional projections lexicalization. Thus, this paper features a explanatory formal proposal to the verb ir reanalysis in BP.

References

AMBAR, Manuela; GONZAGA, Manuela; NEGRÃO, Esmeralda. Tense, quantification and clause structure in EP and BP. Evidence from a comparative study on 'sempre'. In: BOKBENNEMA, Reineke et al. (eds.). Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 256. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2004. cap.1. p. 1-16.

ANDERSEN, Henning. Abductive and Deductive Change. Language. Washington. v. 49. n. 4. p. 765-793. dez. 1973.

BALDE, Moctar. Semântica do Tempo Presente em Pulaar, Francês e Português: estudo comparativo. 2013. 102 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Linguística) – Faculdade de Letras, Universidade do Porto, Porto.

BRITO, Ana Maria. Clause structure, subject positions and verb movement about the positions of sempre in European Portuguese and Brazilian Portuguese. In: D’HULST,Yves; ROORYCK, Johan; SCHROTEN, Jan (eds.). Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 221. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2001. cap. 3. p. 63-85.

CHOMSKY, Noam & HALLE, Morris. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row, 1968.

CHOMSKY, Noam. Barriers. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1986.

CHOMSKY, Noam. Derivation by phase. In: KENSTOWICZ, Michael (ed.). Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2001. cap. 1. p. 1-52.

CHOMSKY, Noam. Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures. Dordrecht: Foris, 1981.

CINQUE, Guglielmo. Adverbs and Functional Heads: a cross-linguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.

COGHILL, Eleanor. The grammaticalization of prospective aspect in a group of Neoaramaic dialects. Diachronica. Amsterdam. v. 27. n. 3. p. 359-410. 2010.

COMRIE, Bernard. Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.

CYRINO, Sonia & MATOS, Gabriela. Elipse do VP e variação paramétrica. Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos. Campinas. v. 42. n. 2. p. 195-206. 2007.

CYRINO, Sonia & MATOS, Gabriela. VP ellipsis in European and Brazilian Portuguese: a comparative analysis. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics. Lisboa. v. 1. n. 2. p. 177-195. 2002.

CYRINO, Sonia. On Richness of Tense and Verb Movement in Brazilian Portuguese. In: CAMACHO-TABOADA, Victoria; et al. (eds.). Information Structure and Agreement. Amsterdã: John Benjamins, 2013. cap. 12. p. 297-317.

DAHL, Osten. The grammar of future time reference in European languages. In: DAHL, Osten (ed.). Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe. Berlim; Nova Iorque: Mouton de Gruyter, 2000a. cap. 6. p. 309-328.

DAHL, Osten. Verbs of becoming as future copulas. In: DAHL, Osten (ed.). Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe. Berlim; Nova Iorque: Mouton de Gruyter, 2000b. cap. 8. p. 351-364.

DUARTE, Maria Eugênia et al. (org.). O sujeito em peças de teatro (1883-1992): estudos diacrônicos. São Paulo: Parábola, 2012.

ELLIOTT, Jennifer. Reallis and irrealis. Forms and concepts of the grammaticalization of reality. Linguistic Typology. Berlin. v. 4. n. 1. p. 55-90. 2000.

FRAWLEY, William. Linguistic Semantics. Hilssdale: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1992.

GONÇALVES, Anabela; COSTA, Teresa da. Auxiliar (a) Compreender os verbos auxiliares: descrição e implicações para o ensino do Português como língua estrangeira. Lisboa: Edições Colibri e Associação de Professores de Português, 2002.

LIGHTFOOT, David. How New Languages Emerge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

LIGHTFOOT, David. How to Set Parameters: Arguments from Language Change. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1991 .

LIGHTFOOT, David. Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.

LIMA, José Pinto de. Sobre a gênese e a evolução do futuro com “ir” em português. In: SILVA, Augusto Soares da (org.). Linguagem e cognição. Braga: Associação Portuguesa de Linguística / Universidade Católica Portuguesa, 2001. cap. 6. p. 119-145.

LUNGUINHO, Marcus Vinícius. Dependências morfossintáticas: a relação verbo auxiliary forma nominal. Revista de Estudos da Linguagem. Belo Horizonte. v. 14. n. 2. p. 457 489.jun./dez. 2006.

LUNGUINHO, Marcus Vinícius. Verbos auxiliares e a sintaxe dos domínios não finitos. 2011. 215 f. Tese (Doutorado em Linguística) – Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo.

MATEUS, Maria Helena Mira; et al. Gramática da Língua Portuguesa. 5. ed. Lisboa: Caminho, 2003.

MATOS, Gabriela & CYRINO, Sonia. Elipse de VP no Português Europeu e no Português Brasileiro. Revista da Abralin. Fortaleza. v. 26. p. 386-390. 2001.

MIOTO, Carlos. Algumas considerações sobre o presente do indicativo. Seminário do Grupo de Estudos Linguísticos de São Paulo, n. 10., 1985. Faculdade do Sagrado Coração, Bauru. 1985. p. 16-21.

MULLER, Ana & BERTUCCI, Roberlei. O aspecto e a interpretação de presente em línguas passado/não-passado versus línguas futuro/não-futuro. In: PILATI, Eloisa & MOREIRA, Bruna (Orgs.). Estudos Formalistas das Línguas Naturais. Campinas: Pontes, 2018. p. 11-48.

PESETSKY, David; TORREGO, Esther. The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In: KARIMI, Simin; SAMIIAN, Vida; WILKINS, Wendy (eds.). Phrasal and Clausal Architecture: Syntactic Derivation and Interpretation. Amsterdã: John Benjamins, 2007. cap. 14. p. 262- 294.

REINTGES, Chris; CYRINO, Sonia. Analyticization and the syntax of the synthetic residue: A macrocomparative perspective. In: MARTINS, Ana Maria; CARDOSO, Adriana (Orgs.). Word Order Change. ed.1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. cap. 10. p. 179-201.

RESENDE, Maurício. A morfologia distribuída e as peças da nominalização: morfofonologia, morfossintaxe, morfossemântica. 2020. f. Tese (Doutorado em Linguística) – Instituto de Estudos da Linguagem, UNICAMP, Campinas.

ROBERTS, Ian. A formal account of grammaticalisation in the history of Romance futures. Folia Linguistica. Berlin. v. 26. n. Historica. p. 219-258. 1992.

ROBERTS, Ian; ROUSSOU, Anna. Syntactic change: a Minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

ROBERTS, Ian. Diachronic Syntax. Nova Iorque: Oxford University Press, 2007.

ROBERTS, John. Modality in Amele and other Papuan languages. Journal of Linguistics. Cambridge. v. 26. n.2. p. 363-401. set. 1990.

SCHMITT, Cristina. Cross-Linguistic Variation And The Present Perfect: The Case Of Portuguese. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory. Berlin. v. 19. n. 2. p. 403-453. 2001.

SILVA, Amós Coêlho. Ars latina: curso prático da língua latina. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2012.

WURMBRAND, Susi. Infinitives are tenseless. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers. Filadélfia. v. 13. n. 1. p. 407-420. 2007.

Published

2022-04-14