Openness and the public sphere: notes on the history and translation of the concept

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/2176-8552.2022.e90444

Keywords:

Translation, Public Sphere, Conceptual history

Abstract

This article examines the history of the modern concept of the ‘public sphere’ (Öffentlichkeit) in the German language and discusses the limits of its translation as ‘public sphere’. While the adjectives “öffentlich” and “public”, entwined in the same traditions, are semantically akin, the German word highlights a meaning that is not evident in other languages: the opposition between what is made visible and disguised, between what is open and accessible to all and what is barred from common knowledge. The translation of Öffentlichkeit as ‘public sphere’, relinquishes the claim and demand of ‘openness’ inscribed in the very form of German word.  This article revisits available work on the history and pre-history of the modern concept calling attention to the nexus between different words and their conceptual meaning, particularly to the association and dissociation between openness and commonality. These historical and philological observations serve to illuminate Hannah Arendt’s association between the sphere of the public and the political. The “space of apparition”, a key concept to Arendt’s reflections, is intimately linked to the semantics of visibility and openness expressed by the term Öffentlichkeit. By taking into consideration the linguistic means to express what is at once common and open we hope to approach the opacity of the networked public spheres in the present from a new perspective.

 

 

 

Author Biography

Luciana Villas Bôas, Faculdade de Letras, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)

Professora de Letras Anglo-Germânicas da UFRJ e autora de Wilde Beschriftungen. Brasiliens historische Semantik in der Frühen Neuzeit (Königshausen & Neumann, 2017), Encontros escritos: semântica histórica do Brasil no século XVI (Editora da UFRJ, 2019) e A república de chinelos. Bolsonaro e o desmonte da representação (Editora 34, 2022).
Currículo Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/0808013899532778

References

ADELUNG, Johann Christoph. Grammatische-kritisches Wörterbuch der hochdeutschen Mundart. Disponível em: https://lexika.digitale sammlungen.de/adelung/lemma/bsb00009133_4_1_1789

ARENDT, Hannah. A condição humana. Trad. Roberto Raposo. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Forense universitária, [1958] 1981.

ARENDT, Hannah. “Was ist Politik?“. In: LUDZ, Ursula. Was ist Politik? Fragmente aus dem Nachlaß, Munique/Berlim, Piper, [2003] 2015.

BLUTEAU, Raphael. Vocabulário Portuguez & latino, áulico, anatomico, architetonico(...). Coimbra: Collegio das Artes da Companhia de Jesus: Lisboa: Officina de Pascoal da Sylva, 1712-1728. Disponível em: https://www.bbm.usp.br/en/dicionarios/vocabulario-portuguez-latino-aulico-anatomico-architectonico/

BOBBIO, Norberto. Democracy and Dictatorship. The Nature and Limits of State Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.

CALHON, Craig. “The Public Sphere and the Field of Power”, Social Science History, v. 34, n. 3, 2010, p. 301-335.

DEIULIO, Laura; LYON, John B. Orgs. Gender Collaboration, and Authorship in German Culture: Literary Joint Ventures.1750-1850. Londres: Bloomsbury, 2019.

EDER, Klaus. “Öffentlchkeit und Demokratie”. In: JACHTENFUCHS, Markus; KOHLER-KOCHT, Beate. Europäische Integration. Wiesbaden: Springer, [1998] 2003, p.85 -120.

FRASER, Nancy. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.” In: CALHOUN, Craig. Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1992, p. 109-142.

GOLDENBAUM, Ursula. Appell an das Publikum. Die öffentliche Debatte in der deutschen Aufklärung. 1687-1796. Berlim: Akademieverlag, 2004.

HABERMAS, Jürgen. Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit. Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft. Frankfurt a.M.:Suhkamp, [1962] 1990.

HOHENDAHL, Peter Uwe. Öffentlichkeit. Geschichte eines kritischen Begriffs. Stuttgart: Mtzler, 2000.

HÖLSCHER, Lucian. “Öffentlichkeit”. In: CONZE, Werner; Koselleck, Reinhart; BRUNNER, Otto. Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1978, p.413-467.

KANT, Immanuel. Resposta à pergunta: que é Esclarecimento?” [Beantwortung der Frage: Was ist Aufklärung?]. In: CARNEIRO LEÃO, Emmanuel. Textos seletos. Edição bilingüe. Petrópolis: Vozes, 1985, p. 100-117.

KITTLER, Friedrich. Discourse Networks 1800/1900. Trad. Michael Mettler e Chris Cullens. Stanford: Stanford University Press, [1985]1990.

KOSELLECK, Reinhardt. Kritik und Krise. Eine Beitrag zur Pathogenese der bürgerlichen Welt. Freiburg/Munique: Alber, 1959.

KOSELLECK, Reinhardt. Crítica e crise. Uma contribuição à patogênese do mundo burguês. Trad. Luciana Villas Bôas. Rio de Janeiro: Contraponto, 1999.

LESSING, Gotthold Ephraim. „Rettungen des Horaz“. In: WÖLFEL, Kurt. Lessings Werke. Frankfurt a.M.: Insel Verlag, 1967, p. 556-593.

MARENS, W. (1968). „Zur Bestimmung der Gattung (Fiktive Verfasserschaft)“. In: Die Botschaft der Tugend. J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart, p. 521. Disponível em : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-99659-6_2

MORAES E SILVA, Antonio. Diccionario da língua portuguesa composto pelo Rafael Bluteau, reformado e acrescentado por Antonio de Moraes Silva natural do Rio de Janeiro. Lisboa: Simão Tadeu Ferreira, 1789. Disponível em: https://www.bbm.usp.br/en/dicionarios/diccionario-da-lingua-portugueza-recompilado-dos-vocabularios-impressos-ate-agora-e-nesta-segunda-edi%C3%A7%C3%A3o-novamente-emendado-e-muito-acrescentado-por-antonio-de-moraes-silva/?page_number=7#dic-viewer

NITSCHKE, Claudia. „Der „häuslicheWirkungskreis im Großen“: Die Funktion der preußischen Königin in der symbolischen Politisierung der bürgerlichen Familie in Novalis’s „Glauben und Liebe““. In: Familienbande - Familienschande: Geschlechterverhältnisse in Familie und Verwandtschaft. Köln: Böhlau, p. 55-74.

REVAULT D’ALLONNES, Myriam. La faiblesse du vrai. Ce que la post-vérité fait a notre monde comum. Paris: Seuil, 2018.

RIEDL, Friedrich Just. Über das Publicum. Briefe an einige Glieder desselben. Jena: Christian Heinrich Cuno, 1768. Disponível em : https://books.google.de/books?id=aRdVAAAAcAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Friedrich+Justus+Riedel&hl=de&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjKhKffv6PvAhXEDewKHeoxCHUQ6AEwB3oECAIQAg#v=onepage&q=Friedrich Justus Riedel&f=false

SOMERS, Margaret R. „Citizenship” zwischen Staat und Markt. Das Konzept der Zivilgesellschaft und das Problem der „dritten Sphäre“, in: Berliner Journal für Soziologie, 8 (1998) p. 489-506.

SOMERS, Margaret R. “Narrating and Naturalizing Civil Society and Citizenship Theory: The Place of Political Culture and the Public Sphere.” Sociological Theory, v.13, n. 3, 1995, p. 229-274.

TUFEKCI, Zeynep. “Engineering the Public: Big Data, Surveillance and Computational Politics”, in First Monday, 19, 7 (2014), s/p.

TUFEKCI, Zeynep. “A Networked Public”, in Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest, New Haven, Yale University Press, 2017, p. 3-27.

WARREN, Michael. “Public and Counterpublics”. Public Culture, v. 14, n.1 (2002) p.49-90.

WIELAND, Christoph Martin. Teutscher Merkur, 1773, v.1. Disponível em: http://ds.ub.uni-bielefeld.de/viewer/image/1951387_001/16/

Published

2022-12-30