The Institutions and your Understanding: would be something propitious to the interpretative premises?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8077.2017v19n47p148Abstract
Criticism aimed at Institutional Theory (IT), undermine especially against its methodological weakness. It is noticeable that his functionalist base, does not provide adequate methodological apparatus, the research in the area, which limits their contributions to the development of knowledge in Organizational Studies. Despite the paradigmatic differences between functionalism and interpretivism, the propositions of Burrel and Morgan (2006), this paper proposes the approach of both, through the use of phenomenology as a methodological resource for the study as part of IT. The central assumption is that phenomenology as methodological tools, can enhance the results in the field of IT, as it gives it greater ability to subjectively their analyzes. The study is qualitative, the theoretical test model, descriptive nature. It was concluded that there are points of convergence between the two lines of thought, which makes it feasible and desirable, the approach of phenomenology as a methodological tool for IT.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The author must ensure:
- that there is complete consensus among all co-authors to approve the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
- that their work is original, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, these have been duly acknowledged.
Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. RCA reserves the right to use software or any other methods of plagiarism detection.
All submissions received for evaluation in the RCA journal are screened for plagiarism and self-plagiarism. Plagiarism identified in manuscripts during the evaluation process will result in the submission being archived. In the event of plagiarism being identified in a manuscript published in the journal, the Editor-in-Chief will conduct a preliminary investigation and, if necessary, retract it.
Authors grant RCA exclusive rights of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons (CC BY) 4.0 International License.
Authors are authorized to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository, on a personal website, publishing a translation, or as a chapter in a book), with an acknowledgement of its authorship and initial publication in this journal.
This license grants any user the right to:
Share – copy, download, print, or redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
According to the following terms:
Attribution – You must give appropriate credit (cite and reference), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions – You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
