The Formation of Management and the Conceptual Dualism theory-practice in Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8077.2020.e69888Abstract
The debate about the growing gap between theoretical and
practical knowledge in the management training of Managers
arouses the central concern of this theoretical essay. It is assumed a certain position of strangeness in view of the situation
of limited recognition of Business Schools in the world, in
Brazil in particular, where renowned researchers warn about
the low relevance of our research. In view of this problem, the
objective of this theoretical essay is to reflect the relationship
between research in Administration and the development
of Administration as a professional training, considering the
discussions involving the conceptual dualism theory-practice
in the training of its members and graduates. As provocations
there seems to be an institutional shift that is present between
the research and teaching practices in Administration, with
its own logics that do not seem to privilege the production of
knowledge applied to the national socio-historical dynamics,
needing to think about the production bases of such knowledge, its logic of legitimation in search of a specific knowledge
of the Administration.
References
ABRAHAMSEN, M. H. et al. Network picturing: an action research study of strategizing in business networks. Industrial Marketing Management, v. 59, p. 107-119, 2016.
AHUJA, V.; PURANKAR, S. Quality business school education and the expectations of the corporate: a research agenda. Procedia Computer Science, v. 139, p. 561-569, 2018.
ALCADIPANI, R.; BERTERO, C. O. Os EUA, a exportação e a expansão do ensino de Management no Brasil nas décadas de 1950 e 1960. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, v. 16, n. 1, p. 50-63, 2018.
AZUDIN, A.; MANSOR, N. Management accounting practices of SMEs: the impact of organizational DNA, business potential and operational technology. Asia Pacific Management Review, v. 23, n. 3, p. 222-226, 2018.
BADEWI, A.; SHEHAB, E. The impact of organizational project benefits management governance on ERP project success: neo-institutional theory perspective. International Journal of Project Management, v. 34, n. 3, p. 412-428, 2016.
BALL, A.; CRAIG, R. Using neo-institutionalism to advance social and environmental accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, v. 21, n. 4, p. 283-293, 2010.
BARBOSA, M. A. C. et al. Nem só de debates epistemológicos vive o pesquisador em administração: alguns apontamentos sobre disputas entre paradigmas e campo científico. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, v. 11, n. 4, p. 636-651, 2013.
BARNARD, C. The Functions of the Executive. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1938.
BENNIS, W. G.; O’TOOLE, J. How business schools lost their way. Harvard Business Review, v. 83, n. 5, p. 96-104, 2005.
BERTERO, C. O. Ensino e Pesquisa em Administração – Relatório GVPesquisa 11/2009. São Paulo: FGV, 2009.
BERTERO, C. O. et al. Os desafios da produção de conhecimento em administração no Brasil. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, v. 11, n. 1, p. 181-196, 2013a.
BERTERO, C. O. et al. Produção científica brasileira em Administração na década de 2000. Revista de Administração de Empresas, v. 53, n. 1, p. 12-20, 2013b.
BONDÍA, J. L. Notas sobre a experiência e o saber de experiência. Revista Brasileira de Educação, v. 19, p. 20-28, 2002.
BOURDIEU, P. Os usos sociais da ciência: Por uma sociologia do campo científico. São Paulo: Editora UNESP, 2004.
BRYDON-MILLER, M.; GREENWOOD, D.; MAGUIRE, P. Why action research? Action Research, v. 1, p. 9-28, 2003.
CARRIERI, A. P. et al. A gestão ordinária dos pequenos negócios: Outro olhar sobre a gestão em estudos organizacionais. Revista de Administração, v. 49, n. 4, p. 698-713, 2014.
CONSELHO NACIONAL DE EDUCAÇÃO (CNE/CES). Resolução nº 4 de 13 de Julho de 2005. Institui as Diretrizes Curriculares Nacionais do Curso de Graduação em Administração, bacharelado, e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, 19 de Julho de 2005.
DELEUZE, G. Diferença e repetição. Rio de Janeiro: Graal, 1998.
DENZIN, N. K.; LINCOLN, Y. S. (Eds.). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. 4 ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2011.
DiMAGGIO, P. L.; POWELL, W. W. The iron case revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. In DiMaggio, P. L., & Powell, W. W. The new institutionalism on organizational analysis (cap. 3). Londres: The University of Chicago Press, 1991.
ECO, U. Como se faz uma tese. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 1991.
HADLER, M. Institutionalism and Neo-institutionalism: history of the concepts. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition), 2015.
HALL, P. A.; TAYLOR, R. C. R. As três versões do Neo-Institucionalismo. Lua Nova, v. 58, p. 193-224, 2003.
HARDT, M.; NEGRI, A. Multidão. Rio de Janeiro: Record, 2005.
KAPLAN, A. A school is “a building that has four walls...with tomorrow inside”: toward the reinvention of the business school. Business Horizons, v. 61, n. 4, p. 599-608, 2018.
KIRSHBAUM, C.; PORTO, E. C.; FERREIRA, F. C. M. Neo-Institucionalismo na produção acadêmica em administração. Revista de Administração de Empresas, v. 3, n. 1, jan./jun., art. 12, 2004.
KOLB, M.; FROHLICH, L.; SCHMIDPETER, R. Implementing sustainability as the new normal: responsible management education - from a private business school’s perspective. International Journal of Management Education, v. 15, n. 2, p. 280-292, 2017.
LA ROCCA, A.; HOHOLM, T.; MORK, B. E. Practice theory and the study of interaction in business relationships: some methodological implications. Industrial Marketing Management, v. 60, p. 187-195, 2017.
LEAL-RODRÍGUEZ, A. L.; ALBORT-MORANT, G. Promoting innovative experiential learning practice to improve academic performance: empirical evidence from a Spanish Business School. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, v. 4, n. 2, p. 97-103, Apr./Jun., 2019.
LEE, K.; HOPE, J.; ABDULGHANI, F. Planned approaches to business and school partnerships. Does it make a difference? The business perspective. Evaluation and Program Planning, v. 55, p. 35-45, 2016.
LIEBERMAN, R. C. Ideas, institutions, and political order: Explaining political change. American Political Science Review, v. 96, n. 4, p. 697-712, 2002.
LIMA, G. M. R.; WOOD JR., T. The Social Impact of research in Business and Public Administration. Revista de Administração de Empresas, v. 54, n. 4, p. 458-463, 2014.
MARCH, J. G.; OLSEN, J. P. Elaborating the New-Institutionalism. In: RHODES, R. A. W.; BINDER, S. A.; ROCKMAN, B. A. The Oxford Handbooks of Political Science. New York: Oxford Press, 2006, p. 3-20.
MARTÍNEZ-FERRERO, J.; GARCÍA-SÁNCHEZ, I. M. Coercive, normative and mimetic isomorphism as determinants of the voluntary assurance of sustainability reports. International Business Review, v. 26, n. 1, p. 102-118, 2017.
MARTINS, G. A.; THEÓPHILO, C. R. Metodologia da investigação cientifica para ciências sociais aplicadas. 2 ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2009.
MATTOS, P. L. C. L. O que diria Popper à literatura administrativa de mercado? Revista de Administração de Empresas, v. 43, n. 1, jan./mar., p. 60-69, 2003a.
MATTOS, P. L. C. L. Teoria administrativa e pragmática da linguagem: perspectivas para problemas que afligem as relações entre acadêmicos e consultores, educadores e educandos. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, v. 7, n. 2, abr./jun., p. 35-55, 2003b.
MCMILLAN, C.; OVERALL, J. Management relevance in a business school setting: a research note on an empirical investigation. International Journal of Management Education, v. 14, n. 2, p. 187-197, 2016.
MINOCHA, S.; REYNOLDS, M.; HRISTOV, D. Developing imaginators not managers: how to flip the business school model. International Journal of Management Education, v. 15, n. 3, p. 481-489, 2017.
MINTZBERG, H. The nature of managerial work. New York: Harper & Eow, 1973.
MINTZBERG, H.; GOSLING, J. Educando administradores além das fronteiras. Revista de Administração de Empresas, v. 43, n. 2, abr./jun., p. 29-43, 2003.
NASCIMENTO, E. O. Os novos institucionalismos na ciência política contemporânea e o problema da integração teórica. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, v. 1, p. 95-121, 2009.
NICOLINI, A. Qual será o futuro das fábricas de administradores? Revista de Administração de Empresas, v. 43, n. 2, p. 44-54, 2003.
ORTENBLAD, A. et al. Business school output: a conceptualisation of business school graduates. International Journal of Management Education, v. 11, n. 2, p. 85-92, 2013.
PAULA, A. P. P. Tragtenberg e a resistência da crítica: Pesquisa e ensino na administração hoje. Revista de Administração de Empresas, v. 41, n. 3, p. 77-81, 2001.
PITELIS, C. N.; WAGNER, J. D. Strategic Shared Leadership and Organizational Dynamic Capabilities. The Leadership Quarterly, v 30, n. 2, apr., p. 233-242, 2019.
ROBSON, C.; MCCARTAN, K. Real world research. John Wiley & Sons, 2016.
SANDERS, E. Historical Institutionalism. In: RHODES, R. A. W.; BINDER, S. A.; ROCKMAN, B. A. The Oxford Handbooks of Political Science. New York: Oxford Press, 2006, p. 39-55.
SARLO, B. Cenas da Vida Pós-Moderna: Intelectuais, arte e videocultura na Argentina. 3 ed. Rio de Janeiro (RJ): Editora UFRJ, 2004.
SERRA, F. A. R.; FIATES, G. G.; FERREIRA, M. P. Publicar é difícil ou faltam competências? O desafio de pesquisar e publicar em revistas cientificas na visão de editores e revisores internacionais. Revista de Administração do Mackenzie, v. 9, n. 4, p. 32-55, 2008.
THIOLLENT, M. Pesquisa-ação nas organizações. 2 ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2009.
TOARNICZKY, A.; MATOLAY, R.; GASPAR, J. Responsive higher education through transformational practices: the case of a Hungarian business school. Futures, (in press), 2019.
WALSH, J. P.; MEYER, A. D.; SCHOONHOVEN, C. B. A future for Organizational Theory: Living in and Living with Changing Organizations. Organization Science, v. 17, n. 5, p. 657-671, 2006.
WILLIAMS, J. Pós-estruturalismo. 2 ed. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2013.
WITTGENSTEIN, L. Investigações filosóficas. São Paulo: Abril Cultural, 1984.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The author must ensure:
- that there is complete consensus among all co-authors to approve the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
- that their work is original, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, these have been duly acknowledged.
Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. RCA reserves the right to use software or any other methods of plagiarism detection.
All submissions received for evaluation in the RCA journal are screened for plagiarism and self-plagiarism. Plagiarism identified in manuscripts during the evaluation process will result in the submission being archived. In the event of plagiarism being identified in a manuscript published in the journal, the Editor-in-Chief will conduct a preliminary investigation and, if necessary, retract it.
Authors grant RCA exclusive rights of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons (CC BY) 4.0 International License.
Authors are authorized to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository, on a personal website, publishing a translation, or as a chapter in a book), with an acknowledgement of its authorship and initial publication in this journal.
This license grants any user the right to:
Share – copy, download, print, or redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
According to the following terms:
Attribution – You must give appropriate credit (cite and reference), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions – You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
