Is it possible to take back control? Democracy in the age of the dual crisis of neoliberal capitalism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1677-2954.2026.e111120Keywords:
neoliberal capitalism, neoliberal globalization, global governance, democracy, Keynes-Polanyi stateAbstract
This article reconstructs and assesses Wolfgang Streeck’s proposal of a Keynes-Polanyi state form and state relations as a pathway to deal with what the author calls a dual crisis of neoliberal capitalism. Streeck argues that this form of state would enable democratic renewal, re-embedding the economy in society. Building on his book Taking Back Control? and other publications on democracy, the paper argues that while Streeck offers a compelling account of the structural decoupling of capitalism and democracy under neoliberal globalization, his reconstruction of democratic agency remains normatively underdetermined. The first part presents Streeck’s thesis of a dual crisis of neoliberal capitalism, drawing also on complementary insights from Wendy Brown. The second part examines the Keynes-Polanyi model. The final section identifies a theoretical gap. Although Streeck insists that democracy must be redistributive rather than technocratic, he refrains from specifying the institutional and normative architecture capable of sustaining such a project. The article argues that without a more explicit account of democratic legitimacy, collective agency, and institutional mediation, the Keynes-Polanyi model risks relying on the very democratic bases that neoliberalism has eroded. By clarifying this tension, the paper concludes that even though Streeck presents a compelling analysis of the consequences of neoliberal globalization, the author does not fully articulate a feasible pathway for the question of how (if possible) the bases of democratic life could be restored.
References
BROWN, Wendy. Undoing the demos: neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. Cambridge: Zone, 2015.
BROWN, Wendy. In the ruins of neoliberalism: the rise of antidemocratic politics in the west. New York: Columbia University, 2019.
DUKES, Ruth; STREECK, Wolfgang. Democracy at work: contract, status, and post-industrial justice. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2023.
JÖRKE, Dirk. Die Größe der Demokratie: Über die räumliche Dimension von Herrschaft und Partizipation. Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2019.
KEYNES, John Maynard. National self-sufficiency. The Yale Review, v. 22, n. 4, p. 755–769, 1933.
MERKEL, Wolfgang. Is capitalism compatible with democracy? Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, v. 8, p. 109–128, 2014.
NUNES, Rodrigo. Do transe à vertigem: ensaios sobre bolsonarismo em um mundo em transição. São Paulo: Ubu, 2022.
PIKETTY, Thomas. Capital in the twenty-first century. Translated by Arthur Goldhammer. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2014.
PIKETTY, Thomas. Capital and ideology. Translated by Arthur Goldhammer. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2020.
PIKETTY, Thomas. A brief history of equality. Translated by Steven Rendall. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2022.
POLANYI, Karl. The Great Transformation. The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. (Boston: Beacon, [1944] 2001).
POLANYI, Karl. Universal capitalism or regional planning? The London Quarterly of World Affairs, v. 10, n. 3, p. 86–91, 1945.
STREECK, Wolfgang. How will capitalism end? essays on a failing system. London; New York: Verso, 2017.
STREECK, Wolfgang. Critical encounters: democracy, capitalism, ideas. London; New York: Verso, 2020.
STREECK, Wolfgang. Zwischen Globalismus und Demokratie: Politische Ökonomie im ausgehenden Neoliberalismus. Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2021.
STREECK, Wolfgang. Taking back control? State and State Systems after Globalism. Translated by Ben Fowkes and Joshua Rahtz. London; New York: Verso, [2021] 2024.
WOLF, Martin. In defence of democratic capitalism. Financial Times, January 19, 2023. Accessed September 13, 2025. https://www.ft.com/content/877d1a2d-67df-46a4-a3af-8e28198b944a.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Tiago Mendonça dos Santos

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and publication rights over their works, without restrictions.
Upon submitting their work, authors grant ethic@ the exclusive right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 International License. This license allows third parties to remix, adapt, and build upon the published work, provided that proper credit is given to the authorship and to the original publication in this journal.
Authors are also permitted to enter into additional contracts, separately, for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work in this journal (for example: deposit in an institutional repository, make it available on a personal website, publish translations, or include it as a book chapter), provided that authorship and the initial publication in ethic@ are acknowledged.
