Formação de professores (de ciências) na Inglaterra: racionalidade técnica e despolitização da educação científica

Autores

  • Haira Gandolfi Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, UK

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7941.2025.106722

Palavras-chave:

Formação de Professores, Trabalho Docente, Ensino de Ciências, Políticas Públicas, Inglaterra

Resumo

In this editorial, I will outline a brief overview of educational reforms and policies related to teacher education and work in England, paying special attention paid to how they have been shaping science teachers’ education and work in country through a technical-rational and apolitical perspective for the past decades. Of particular concern to me as a science educator working at both Initial Teacher Education and Continuous Professional Development levels in England is that increasingly complex and intertwined socio-scientific and social justice issues have become the norm across the world in the past decades, showcasing the growing complexity of the relationships between scientific knowledge and practices, socio-political challenges and injustices. However, as I will endeavour to show across this editorial, science teacher-related policies in England seems to remain rooted in a technical-rational perspective, often portraying science and science teachers’ work – including science teacher education – through a naïve positivist lens as neutral, objective, and disconnected from power, culture and socio-political structures and practices.

Biografia do Autor

Haira Gandolfi, Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, UK

Haira Gandolfi is an Associate Professor at the Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge/UK. She has a PhD in Education from the University College London/UCL (UK), and a MSc in Science Education and a BSc in Chemistry Teaching from the University of Campinas/UNICAMP (Brazil). She has experience in Chemistry teaching at secondary and postsecondary levels in Brazil, and her research interests are Science Education, and History, Philosophy, and Sociology of Science, Decolonial Curricula and Pedagogies, Radical and Critical Education, and Teacher Education.

Referências

AVELAR, M. O público, o privado e a despolitização nas políticas educacionais. Educação contra a barbárie: por escolas democráticas e pela liberdade de ensinar. Boitempo, 2019. p.73-79.

AVELAR, M.; BALL, S. J. Mapping new philanthropy and the heterarchical state: The Mobilization for the National Learning Standards in Brazil. International Journal of Educational Development, v. 64, p. 65-73, 2019.

BALL, S. J. What is policy? Texts, trajectories and toolboxes. The Australian Journal of Education Studies, v. 13, n. 2, p. 10-17, 1993.

BALL, S. The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, v. 18, n. 2, p. 215-228, 2003.

BALL, S. J. Following policy: Networks, network ethnography and education policy mobilities. Journal of Education Policy, v. 31, n. 5, p. 549-566, 2016.

BALL, S. J.; MAGUIRE, M.; BRAUN, A. How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. Routledge, 2012.

BAZZUL, J. Political entanglement and the changing nature of science. In: Hansson, L.; Yacoubian, H. A. (Eds.). Nature of Science for Social Justice. Springer International Publishing, 2020. p. 79-95.

BIESTA, G. J. Why ‘what works’ still won’t work: From evidence-based education to value-based education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, v. 29, p. 491-503, 2010.

CLARKE, M. The subordination of teacher identity: Ethical risks and potential lines of flight. Teachers & Teaching, v. 29, n. 3, p. 241-258, 2023.

CLARKE, M.; LYON, C. H. The evil of authoritarian education: Banality and compliance in the neoliberal era. Forum, v. 65, n. 1, p. 130-139, 2023.

COWEN, N. For whom does “what works” work? The political economy of evidence-based education. In The Evidential Basis of “Evidence-Based Education”. Routledge, 2020. p. 81-98.

Department for Education/DfE. (2013). National Curriculum - Science. Retrieved March 24, 2025, from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-science-programmes-of-study.

Department for Education/DfE. (2019/2021). Early Career Framework. Retrieved March 24, 2025, from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/60795936d3bf7f400b462d74/Early-Career_Framework_April_2021.pdf.

Department for Education/DfE. (2019/2021). Initial Teacher Training Core Content Framework. Retrieved March 24, 2025, from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/initial-teacher-training-itt-core-content-framework

Department for Education/DfE. (2022). Political impartiality in schools. Retrieved Marchj 24, 2025, from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/political-impartiality-in-schools/ political-impartiality-in-schools.

DUNLOP, L.; RUSHTON, E. A. Putting climate change at the heart of education: Is England's strategy a placebo for policy? British Educational Research Journal, v. 48, n. 6, p. 1083-1101, 2022.

DUNLOP, L.; ATKINSON, L.; MALMBERG, C.; TURKENBURG-VAN DIEPEN, M.; URBAS, A. Treading carefully: the environment and political participation in science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, p. 1-23, 2024.

FAIRCLOUGH, N. Critical discourse analysis. In The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis. Routledge, 2013. p. 9-20.

FILIPE, F. A.; SILVA, D. D. S.; COSTA, Á. D. C. Uma base comum na escola: análise do projeto educativo da Base Nacional Comum Curricular. Ensaio: avaliação e políticas públicas em educação, v. 29, p. 783-803, 2021.

HORDERN, J.; BROOKS, C. The core content framework and the ‘new science’ of educational research. Oxford Review of Education, v. 49, n. 6, p. 800-818, 2023.

HORDERN, J.; BROOKS, C. Towards instrumental trainability in England? The ‘official pedagogy’of the Core Content Framework. British Journal of Educational Studies, v. 72, n. 1, p. 5-22, 2024.

LINGARD, B.; SELLAR, S. Globalization, edu-business and network governance: the policy sociology of Stephen J. Ball and rethinking education policy analysis. London Review of Education, v. 11, n. 3, p. 265-280, 2013.

MAGUIRE, M.; BALL, S.; BRAUN, A. Behaviour, classroom management and student ‘control’: Enacting policy in the English secondary school. International Studies in Sociology of Education, v. 20, n. 2, p. 153-170, 2010.

MOURA, C. B. (Ed.). A Sociopolitical Turn in Science Education: Towards Post-pandemic Worlds. Springer Nature, 2025.

REZENDE, F.; OSTERMANN, F. Hegemonic and counter-hegemonic discourses in science education from the perspective of a post-critical curriculum theory. Cultural Studies of Science Education, v. 15, p. 679-694, 2020.

TARLAU, R.; MOELLER, K. ‘Philanthropizing’ consent: how a private foundation pushed through national learning standards in Brazil. Journal of Education Policy, v. 35, n. 3, p. 337-366, 2020.

UNSWORTH, R.; CLARKE, M.; HANSEN, D. R. Immunitas and (un)desirable teacher knowledge in teacher education. European Journal of Education, v. 59, n. 1, e12577, 2024.

Publicado

2025-05-12

Como Citar

Gandolfi, H. (2025). Formação de professores (de ciências) na Inglaterra: racionalidade técnica e despolitização da educação científica. Caderno Brasileiro De Ensino De Física, 42(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7941.2025.106722