ChatGPT and academic dishonesty: accounting students’ perception of its use

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/1983-4535.2024.e99115

Keywords:

Accounting Education, Artificial Intelligence, ChatGPT, Dishonesty

Abstract

The aim of this paper was to analyze how accounting students perceive the use of ChatGPT, for academic purposes, from the perspective of honesty. ChatGPT is an artificial intelligence capable of generating texts in natural language, considered disruptive, given its potential for innovation. In this sense, the behavioral issue related to the use of the program for academic purposes has been discussed. To achieve the aim, a questionnaire was administered to 163 students from public and private universities and descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, multiple linear and logistic regression, and principal component analysis were used. The results showed that 42.9% of respondents admit to having made partial copies of the answers; 31% indicated that they never copied ChatGPT answers, but partially rewrote what he answered. The research also highlighted the relationship between the perception of honesty and whether or not one is a ChatGPT user. The work contributes to previous studies, as it updates knowledge about the students' perspective, regarding their behavior; and also to Higher Education Institutions and their teachers, in order to understand the students' perception and be able to create mechanisms that reduce or inhibit the use of ChatGPT in a dishonest manner.

Author Biographies

Mariana Azevedo Alves, Universidade de Brasília (UnB)

Doutoranda em Ciências Contábeis pela Universidade de Brasília (UnB)

Mestre em Administração Pública pela Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF-VR)

César Augusto Tibúrcio Silva, Universidade de Brasília (UnB)

Doutor em Controladoria e Contabilidade pela Universidade de São Paulo (USP)

Professor do departamento de Ciências Contábeis e Atuariais da Universidade de Brasília (UnB)

Mariana Pereira Bonfim, Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF-VR)

Doutora em Ciências Contábeis pela Universidade de Brasília (UnB)

Professora do departamento de Ciências Contábeis da Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF-VR)

References

AHSAN, K.; AKBAR, S.; KAM, B. Contract cheating in higher education: a systematic literature review and future research agenda. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, v. 47, n. 4, p. 523-539, 2022.

ALSHURAFAT, H.; AL SHBAIL, M.O.; HAMDAN, A.; AL-DMOUR, A.; ENSOUR, W. Factors affecting accounting students’ misuse of chatgpt: an application of the fraud triangle theory. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 2023.

BONFIM, M. P.; SILVA, C. A. T. Collective dishonesty: an analysis of the group’s influence in the dishonest behavior. Revista de Administração da UNIMEP, v. 19, n. 5, 2021.

BROWN, T.; MANN, B.; RYDER, N.; SUBBIAH, M.; ...; AMODEI, D. Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems, v. 33, p. 1877-1901, 2020.

BUJAKI, M.; LENTO, C.; SAYED, N. Utilizing professional accounting concepts to understand and respond to academic dishonesty in accounting programs. Journal of Accounting Education, v. 47, p. 28-47, 2019.

COTTON, D. R. E.; COTTON, P. A.; SHIPWAY, J. R. Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, p. 1-12, 2023.

CRIBBEN, I.; ZEINALLI, Y. The Benefits and Limitations of ChatGPT in Business Education and Research: A Focus on Management Science, Operations Management and Data Analytics. 2023. Disponível em: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4404276. Acesso em: 02 dez. 2023.

DEHOUCHE, N. Plagiarism in the age of massive Generative Pre-trained Transformers (GPT-3). Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, v. 21, p. 17-23, 2021.

DWIVEDI, Y. K.; KSHETRI, N.; HUGHES, L.; SLADE, E. L.; ...; WRIGHT, R. “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, v. 71, p. 102642, 2023.

EULERICH, M.; SANATIZADEH, A.; VAKILZADEH, H.; WOOD, D. A. Can Artificial Intelligence Pass Accounting Certification Exams? ChatGPT: CPA, CMA, CIA, and EA?. 2023. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4452175. Acesso em: 07 mar. 2024.

FREITAS, M. M.; SALLABERY, J. D.; SILVA, T. B. J.; ROSA, F. S. Resolução de Problemas Contábeis com o ChatGPT 4. In: International Conference in Management and Accounting, 5., 2023. Anais... International Conference in Management and Accounting, 2023.

FRÓES, R. C.; SILVA, D. M. Desonestidade acadêmica nos programas de pós-graduação stricto sensu em ciências contábeis. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, v. 32, p. 541-559, 2021.

GARCÍA-PEÑALVO, J. F. The perception of Artificial Intelligence in Educational contexts after the launch of ChatGPT: Disruption or Panic? Education in the Knowledge Society, v. 24, p. 1-9, 2023.

HERDIAN, H.; MILDAENI, I. N.; WAHIDAH, F. R. “There are always ways to cheat” academic dishonesty strategies during online learning. Journal of Learning Theory and Methodology, v. 2, n. 2, p. 60-67, 2021.

HWANG, G. J.; XIE, H.; WAH, B. W.; GASEVIC, D. Vision, challenges, roles and research issues of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, v. 1, p. 100001, 2020.

MAZAR, N.; AMIR, O.; ARIELY, D. The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. Journal of Marketing Research, v. 45, n. 6, p. 633-644, 2008.

NASU, V. H.; AFONSO, L. E. Relação entre cinismo e expectativa de trapaça na vida acadêmica e profissional: um estudo com alunos de cursos de pós-graduação lato sensu da área de contabilidade. Revista de Educação e Pesquisa em Contabilidade (REPeC), v. 14, n. 3, 2020.

OPENAI. Introducing ChatGPT. 2022. Disponível em: https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt. Acesso em: 07 mar. 2024.

OUYANG, F.; ZHENG, L.; JIAO, P. Artificial intelligence in online higher education: A systematic review of empirical research from 2011 to 2020. Education and Information Technologies, v. 27, n. 6, p. 7893-7925, 2022.

QU, J.; ZHAO, Y.; XIE, Y. Artificial intelligence leads the reform of education models. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, v. 39, n. 3, p. 581-588, 2022.

REDECKER, C. European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators. Publications Office of the European Union, 2017.

RUDOLPH, J.; TAN, S.; TAN, S. ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, v. 6, n. 1, 2023.

SADEGHI, R. The attitude of scholars has not changed towards plagiarism since the medieval period: Definition of plagiarism according to Shams-e-Qays, thirteenth-century Persian literary scientist. Research Ethics, v. 15, n. 2, p. 1-3, 2019.

SOK, S.; HENG, K. ChatGPT for education and research: A review of benefits and risks. 2023. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4378735. Acesso em 02 dez. 2023.

SULLIVAN, M.; KELLY, A.; MCLAUGHLAN, P. ChatGPT in higher education: Consideration for academic integrity and student learning. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, v. 6, n. 1, p. 1-10, 2023.

SUSNJAK, T. ChatGPT: The End of Online Exam Integrity?. 2022. Disponível em: https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.09292. Acesso em: 07 mar. 2024.

VENTAYEN, R. J. M. OpenAI ChatGPT Generated Results: Similarity Index of Artificial Intelligence-Based Contents. 2023. Disponível em: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4332664. Acesso em: 07 mar. 2024.

WOOD, D. A.; ACHHPILIA, M. P.; ADAMS, M. T.;...; ZOET, E. The ChatGPT Artificial Intelligence Chatbot: How Well Does It Answer Accounting Assessment Questions? Issues in Accounting Education, p. 1-28, 2023.

ZAREMBA, A.; DEMIR, E. ChatGPT: Unlocking the future of NLP in finance. Modern Finance, v. 1, n. 1, p. 93-98, 2023.

Published

2025-01-08

Issue

Section

Artigos