IDENTIFIERS AND OPEN SCIENCE: ELEMENTS FOR A SOCIO-TECHNICAL ANALYSIS OF ORCID

Conteúdo do artigo principal

GAËLLE BÉQUET
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8299-9724

Resumo

Objetivo: descrever e analisar o ambiente técnico e social de um identificador usado globalmente na comunidade de pesquisa preocupada com a implementação da ciência aberta. Design ½ Metodologia  ½ abordagem: este artigo descreve o processo de criação de um identificador através das lentes da Social Construction Of Technology (SCOT) e da Actor Network Theory (ANT). Esta pesquisa usa fontes primárias disponíveis nos sites Orcid e ISNI, bem como literatura cinza fornecida por um bibliotecário envolvido no desenvolvimento do ISNI. Fontes secundárias, e. g. artigos revisados por pares também são citados. Resultados: os grupos sociais que apoiam o Orcid são identificados e suas ações são descritas. O modelo de desenvolvimento da Orcid é analisado. A relação entre Orcid e o advento de sistemas de monitoramento da produção científica pública é estabelecida. Originalidade ½ Valor: identificadores persistentes são considerados uma infraestrutura chave da ciência aberta. Várias partes interessadas estão envolvidas em sua implementação. É importante entender qual agência essas partes interessadas têm nos sistemas técnicos para fazê-los atender aos seus objetivos.


References

 


Akrich, M. (1993). Les objets techniques et leurs utilisateurs, de la conception à l'action. Retrieved September 7, 2022, from https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00081731v1


Andrews, P. C. S. (2020). The platformization of open. In M. P. Eve & J. Gray (Eds.), Reassembling scholarly communications: Histories, infrastructures, and global politics of open access. MIT Press.


Béquet, G. (2009, May 25-30). Digital library as a controversy: Gallica vs Google. 9th Conference Libraries in the Digital Age [Paper presentation], Dubrovnik, Croatia. pp. 116-123. Retrieved September 7, 2022, from https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00718385/file/Digital_library_as_a_controversy.pdf


Béquet, G. (2015). Trois bibliothèques européennes face à Google: Aux origines de la bibliothèque numérique (1990-2010). Publications de l'Écoles des Chartes.


Berger, P., & Luckmann, T.  (1966). The social construction of reality. Doubleday.


 


Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003). Retrieved September 7, 2022, from https://openaccess.mpg.de/Berlin-Declaration


Bilder, G. (2011). Disambiguation without de-duplication: Modeling authority and trust in the Orcid system. Retrieved September 7, 2022, from https://www.crossref.org/wp/labs/whitepapers/disambiguation-deduplication-wp-v4.pdf


Bohannon, J. (2016). Publishers embrace scheme to end name confusion. Science, 351(6270), p.213.


Bohannon, J. (2017). Restless minds: analysis of a vast set of public CVs reveals the world's most migratory scientists. Science, 356(6339), pp. 690-692.


Boudry, C., & Durand-Barthez, M. (2020). Use of author identifier services (Orcid, ResearcherID) and academic social networks (Academia.edu, ResearchGate) by the researchers of the University of Caen, Normandy (France): A case study. PLoS ONE Public Library of Science, 15(9), pp. e0238583. Retrieved September 7, 2022, from https://hal. archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02936042


 Budapest Open Access Initiative Declaration (2001). Retrieved September 7, 2022, from https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/


Choras, M., & Jaroszewska-Choras, D. (2020). The scrutinizing look on the impending proliferation of mandatory Orcid use from the perspective of data protection, privacy and freedom of science. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 45(4), pp. 492-507.


College Europe and International (2019). Open credentials for open science. Retrieved September 7, 2022, from https://hal-lara.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03640303/


Doherty, N. F., Coombs, C. R., & Loan-Clarke, J. (2006). A re-conceptualization of the interpretive flexibility of information technologies: Redressing the balance between the social and the technical. Loughborough’s Institutional Repository. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000653


 


Flichy, P. (2003). L’innovation technique: Récents développements en sciences sociales vers une nouvelle théorie de l'innovation. La Découverte.


Herther, N. (2010). Who's on first? Name disambiguation today. Searcher: The Magazine for Database Professionals, 18(8).


 


ISO International Organization for Standardization (2022). ISO/TS 22943:2022 Information and documentation: Principles of identification. Retrieved September 7, 2022, from https://www.iso.org/standard/83121.html


ISO International Organization for Standardization (2022). ISO/TS 27729:2012 Information and documentation: International Standard Name Identifier (ISNI). Retrieved September 7, 2022, from https://www.iso.org/standard/44292.html


Knowledge Exchange (2015). Researcher identifiers: national approaches to Orcid and ISNI implementation. Retrieved September 7, 2022, from https://www.knowledge-exchange.info/event/researcher-identifiers


Latour, B. (1992). Aramis ou l'amour des techniques. Prix Roberval.


Latour, B. (2003). L'impossible métier de l'innovation technique (pp. 9-26). In P. Mustar & H. Penan (Eds.), Encyclopédie de l'innovation. Economica.


Latour, B. (2007). Changer de société, refaire de la sociologie. La Découverte.


Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Sage


Leopold S. S. (2016). Editorial: Orcid is a wonderful (but not required) tool for authors. Clin Orthop Relat Res., 474(5), p. 1083-1085. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-4760-0


Mirowski, P. (2018). The future(s) of open science. Social Studies of Science, 48(2), pp. 171-203.


Mouton, S. (2008). Les fondements constitutionnels de la liberté de recherche. In J. Larrieu, Qu'en est-il du droit de la recherche? Presses de l'Université Toulouse 1 Capitole. Retrieved September 7, 2022, from https://books.openedition.org/putc/2498?lang=fr


Orcid (2011). Outreach meeting. Retrieved September 7, 2022, from http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1384382?ln=sv


Orcid (2014). Orcid and ISNI: strategic partner MoU. Retrieved September 7, 2022, from https://info.orcid.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Orcid-ISNI-MOU_20140204_Signed.pdf


Pinch, T., & Bijker, W. E. (1984). The social construction of facts and artifacts, or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/030631284014003004


Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, translations and boundary objects. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387-420.


Tran, C. Y., & Lyon, J. A. (2017). Faculty use of author identifiers and researcher networking tools. College & Research Libraries, 78(2), 171. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.78.2.171


Unesco (2021). Recommendation on open science. Retrieved September 7, 2022, from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379949

Detalhes do artigo

Seção
Artigos
Biografia do Autor

GAËLLE BÉQUET, Director of the ISSN International Centre

Possui graduação em Engenharia Mecânica (1990), mestrado em Ciência da Informação pela Universidade de Brasília (1997) e doutorado em Ciência da Informação (2006). Atualmente é Professora Assistente do Departamento de Ciência da Informação da mesma Universidade.