IDENTIFIERS AND OPEN SCIENCE: ELEMENTS FOR A SOCIO-TECHNICAL ANALYSIS OF ORCID

Resumo

Objetivo: descrever e analisar o ambiente técnico e social de um identificador usado globalmente na comunidade de pesquisa preocupada com a implementação da ciência aberta. Design ½ Metodologia  ½ abordagem: este artigo descreve o processo de criação de um identificador através das lentes da Social Construction Of Technology (SCOT) e da Actor Network Theory (ANT). Esta pesquisa usa fontes primárias disponíveis nos sites Orcid e ISNI, bem como literatura cinza fornecida por um bibliotecário envolvido no desenvolvimento do ISNI. Fontes secundárias, e. g. artigos revisados por pares também são citados. Resultados: os grupos sociais que apoiam o Orcid são identificados e suas ações são descritas. O modelo de desenvolvimento da Orcid é analisado. A relação entre Orcid e o advento de sistemas de monitoramento da produção científica pública é estabelecida. Originalidade ½ Valor: identificadores persistentes são considerados uma infraestrutura chave da ciência aberta. Várias partes interessadas estão envolvidas em sua implementação. É importante entender qual agência essas partes interessadas têm nos sistemas técnicos para fazê-los atender aos seus objetivos.

References

Akrich, M. (1993). Les objets techniques et leurs utilisateurs, de la conception à l'action. Retrieved September 7, 2022, from https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00081731v1

Andrews, P. C. S. (2020). The platformization of open. In M. P. Eve & J. Gray (Eds.), Reassembling scholarly communications: Histories, infrastructures, and global politics of open access. MIT Press.

Béquet, G. (2009, May 25-30). Digital library as a controversy: Gallica vs Google. 9th Conference Libraries in the Digital Age [Paper presentation], Dubrovnik, Croatia. pp. 116-123. Retrieved September 7, 2022, from https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00718385/file/Digital_library_as_a_controversy.pdf

Béquet, G. (2015). Trois bibliothèques européennes face à Google: Aux origines de la bibliothèque numérique (1990-2010). Publications de l'Écoles des Chartes.

Berger, P., & Luckmann, T.  (1966). The social construction of reality. Doubleday.

Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003). Retrieved September 7, 2022, from https://openaccess.mpg.de/Berlin-Declaration

Bilder, G. (2011). Disambiguation without de-duplication: Modeling authority and trust in the Orcid system. Retrieved September 7, 2022, from https://www.crossref.org/wp/labs/whitepapers/disambiguation-deduplication-wp-v4.pdf

Bohannon, J. (2016). Publishers embrace scheme to end name confusion. Science, 351(6270), p.213.

Bohannon, J. (2017). Restless minds: analysis of a vast set of public CVs reveals the world's most migratory scientists. Science, 356(6339), pp. 690-692.

Boudry, C., & Durand-Barthez, M. (2020). Use of author identifier services (Orcid, ResearcherID) and academic social networks (Academia.edu, ResearchGate) by the researchers of the University of Caen, Normandy (France): A case study. PLoS ONE Public Library of Science, 15(9), pp. e0238583. Retrieved September 7, 2022, from https://hal. archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02936042

 Budapest Open Access Initiative Declaration (2001). Retrieved September 7, 2022, from https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/

Choras, M., & Jaroszewska-Choras, D. (2020). The scrutinizing look on the impending proliferation of mandatory Orcid use from the perspective of data protection, privacy and freedom of science. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 45(4), pp. 492-507.

College Europe and International (2019). Open credentials for open science. Retrieved September 7, 2022, from https://hal-lara.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03640303/

Doherty, N. F., Coombs, C. R., & Loan-Clarke, J. (2006). A re-conceptualization of the interpretive flexibility of information technologies: Redressing the balance between the social and the technical. Loughborough’s Institutional Repository. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000653

Flichy, P. (2003). L’innovation technique: Récents développements en sciences sociales vers une nouvelle théorie de l'innovation. La Découverte.

Herther, N. (2010). Who's on first? Name disambiguation today. Searcher: The Magazine for Database Professionals, 18(8).

ISO International Organization for Standardization (2022). ISO/TS 22943:2022 Information and documentation: Principles of identification. Retrieved September 7, 2022, from https://www.iso.org/standard/83121.html

ISO International Organization for Standardization (2022). ISO/TS 27729:2012 Information and documentation: International Standard Name Identifier (ISNI). Retrieved September 7, 2022, from https://www.iso.org/standard/44292.html

Knowledge Exchange (2015). Researcher identifiers: national approaches to Orcid and ISNI implementation. Retrieved September 7, 2022, from https://www.knowledge-exchange.info/event/researcher-identifiers

Latour, B. (1992). Aramis ou l'amour des techniques. Prix Roberval.

Latour, B. (2003). L'impossible métier de l'innovation technique (pp. 9-26). In P. Mustar & H. Penan (Eds.), Encyclopédie de l'innovation. Economica.

Latour, B. (2007). Changer de société, refaire de la sociologie. La Découverte.

Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Sage

Leopold S. S. (2016). Editorial: Orcid is a wonderful (but not required) tool for authors. Clin Orthop Relat Res., 474(5), p. 1083-1085. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-4760-0

Mirowski, P. (2018). The future(s) of open science. Social Studies of Science, 48(2), pp. 171-203.

Mouton, S. (2008). Les fondements constitutionnels de la liberté de recherche. In J. Larrieu, Qu'en est-il du droit de la recherche? Presses de l'Université Toulouse 1 Capitole. Retrieved September 7, 2022, from https://books.openedition.org/putc/2498?lang=fr

Orcid (2011). Outreach meeting. Retrieved September 7, 2022, from http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1384382?ln=sv

Orcid (2014). Orcid and ISNI: strategic partner MoU. Retrieved September 7, 2022, from https://info.orcid.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Orcid-ISNI-MOU_20140204_Signed.pdf

Pinch, T., & Bijker, W. E. (1984). The social construction of facts and artifacts, or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/030631284014003004

Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, translations and boundary objects. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387-420.

Tran, C. Y., & Lyon, J. A. (2017). Faculty use of author identifiers and researcher networking tools. College & Research Libraries, 78(2), 171. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.78.2.171

Unesco (2021). Recommendation on open science. Retrieved September 7, 2022, from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379949