Morality and Biology in Patricia Churchland: The Contribution of Biological Inescapability to the Ethical Debate

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2026.e105905

Keywords:

Patricia Churchland, Biological Ethics, Ethical Inescapability, Moral Dispositions

Abstract

The paper discusses Churchland's biologicist position in her 2019 book (Conscience: The Origins of Moral Intuition). It argues that this position can make a contribution to the traditional debate in Ethics. The first section reconstructs Churchland’s position and some of the main objections it faces. The second section interprets this position as a defence of ethical inescapability, akin to other positions inspired by Kantian and semanticist approaches. The third section explores the objections each of these positions raises against the others and suggests that they can be understood as complementary. In this sense, biologicism can offer valuable contributions to the ethical discussion.

The paper discusses Churchland's biologicist position in her 2019 book (Conscience: The Origins of Moral Intuition). It argues that this position can make a contribution to the traditional debate in Ethics. The first section reconstructs Churchland’s position and some of the main objections it faces. The second section interprets this position as a defence of ethical inescapability, akin to other positions inspired by Kantian and semanticist approaches. The third section explores the objections each of these positions raises against the others and suggests that they can be understood as complementary. In this sense, biologicism can offer valuable contributions to the ethical discussion.

References

Apel, K.-O. 1999 [1976]. Das Apriori der Kommunikationsgemeinschaft und die Grundlagen der Ethik. In: Transformation der Philosophie II, p.358-435. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

Apel, K.-O. 1998. Auseinandersetzungen in Erprobung des transzendentalpragmatischen Ansatzes. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt am Main.

Aristóteles. 2004. Metafísica. Trad. H. Zucchi. Buenos Aires: Sudamericana.

Caplan, Arthur. 2019. A critical examination of current sociobiological theory: Adequacy and implications. In: Sociobiology: Beyond nature/nurture?, p.97-121. London: Routledge.

Crelier, Andrés. 2010. De los argumentos trascendentales a la hermenéutica trascendental. La Plata: Edulp.

Churchland, P. 2019. Conscience: The origins of moral intuition. New York: WW Norton & Company.

Kant, I. 1785. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Akademie-Ausgabe, Band IV. Berlin: Preußische Akademie der Wissenschaften.

Korsgaard, C. M. 1996. The sources of normativity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Mackie, J. L. 1977. Ethics: Inventing right and wrong. London: Penguin Books.

Platón. 1985. Diálogos I. Madrid: Gredos.

Parfit, D. 2011. On what matters. Vol. 1. New York: Oxford University Press.

Putnam, H. 2004. The collapse of the fact/value dichotomy and other essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Ridge, M. 2019. Moral non-naturalism. In: E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (Fall 2019 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/moral-non-naturalism/.

Schiller, F. 2010 [1788]. Die Tugend. In: Schillers Gedichte, p.123. Stuttgart: Reclam.

Schnettler, S. 2020. The Sociobiology Wars. In: T. Shackelford; V. Weekes-Shackelford (eds.), Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1371-1

Tomasello, M. 2023. Differences in the social motivations and emotions of humans and other great apes. Human Nature 34(4): 588-604.

Taylor, C. 1989. Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wittgenstein, L. 1988 [1979]. Sobre la certeza (Edición bilingüe). Madrid: Gedisa. (Original de 1979 por Basil Blackwell, Oxford).

Published

2026-03-25

Issue

Section

Special Issue: 40 years of Patricia Churchland’s Neurophilosophy