Newton da Costa on True Contradictions: from aporias to reality

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2025.e107340

Palabras clave:

Dialetheism, Paraconsistency, Newton da Costa, Aporias, Paradoxes

Resumen

Dialetheism is the thesis that some contradictions are true. In this paper, we explore claims to such a thesis to be found in some early philosophical writings of Newton da Costa, most notably in his book Ensaio Sobre os Fundamentos da Lógica (hereafter mentioned as the Essay). We present and explore da Costa’s claims that, in a certain sense, abstract notions such as ‘set’ and ‘truth’ may clearly involve true contradictions. Additionaly, we reconstruct da Costa’s argument to the effect that some contradictions may also be true of concrete reality. In a nutshell, da Costa suggests that some paradoxes, the aporias, are so deeply problematic that they may be pointing to reality as the source of the contradiction; i.e. aporias may ground a form of metaphysical dialetheism. This goes further than most dialetheistic claims found in the current literature. We compare these claims to a standard approach to dialetheism as Graham Priest’s, and conclude that da Costa offers a version of dialetheism too in the Essay. This opens the door for interesting explorations of some valuable yet often overlooked contributions of da Costa’s thought to the contemporary debate on dialetheism.

Citas

Arenhart, J. R. B. 2018. The Price of true Contradictions About the World. In: W. Carnielli; J. Malinowski (eds.) Contradictions, from consistency to inconsistency. Trends in Logic 47, pp.11--31. Cham: Springer.

Arenhart, J. R. B. 2019. O Platonismo Multivalente de N. C. A. da Costa. Dissertatio 49: 3--22.

Arenhart, J. R. B. 2021. The evidence approach to paraconsistency versus the paraconsistent approach to evidence. Synthese 198: 11537--11559.

Arenhart, J. R. B. 2022. Interpreting philosophical interpretations of paraconsistency. Synthese 200: 1--21.

Arenhart, J. R. B.; Melo, E. S. 2018. Dialetheists' Lies About the Liar. Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 22: 59--85.

Arenhart, J. R. B.; Melo, E. S. 2022. The Liar Paradox: Between Evidence and Truth. Logic and Logical Philosophy 200: 1--23.

Barrio, E.; da Re, B. 2018. Paraconsistency and its Philosophical Interpretations. Australasian Journal of Logic 15(2): 151--170.

Carnielli, W.; Rodrigues, A. 2019. An Epistemic Approach to Paraconsistency: a Logic of Evidence and Truth. Synthese 196: 3789--3813.

Carnielli, W.; Rodrigues, A. 2020. On epistemic and ontological interpretations of intuitionistic and paraconsistent paradigms. Logic Journal of the IGPL 29(4): 569--584.

da Costa, N. C. A. 1986. On paraconsistent set theory. Logique et analyse 29: 361--371.

da Costa, N. C. A. 1997. Logiques Classiques et Non Classiques. Essai sur les fondements de la logique. Paris: Masson.

da Costa, N. C. A. 2008. Ensaio sobre os fundamentos da Lógica, 3a edição. São Paulo: Hucitec.

da Costa, N. C. A.; Krause, D.; Bueno, O. 2007. Paracosistent logics and paraconsistency. In: Dale Jacquette (ed.) Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. Philosophy of Logic, pp.791--911. Elsevier.

Mares, E. 2004. Semantic dialetheism. In: G. Priest; J. C. Beall; B. Armour-Garb (eds.) The Law of Non-Contradiction, pp.264--275. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

Priest, G. 2006. In Contradiction: a study of the transconsistent. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford Un. Press.

Priest, G. 2006. Doubt Truth to be a Liar. Oxford: Oxford Un. Press.

Priest, G. 2007. Paraconsistency and dialetheism. In: D. Gabbay; J. Woods (eds.) The Handbook of the History of Logic. Volume 8. The many-valued and non-monotonic turn in logic, pp.129--204. Elsevier: Amsterdam.

Priest, G. 2019. Some Comments and Replies. In: C. Başkent; T. M. Ferguson (eds.) Graham Priest on Dialetheism and Paraconsistency, pp.575--675. Springer Verlag: Cham, Switzerland.

Priest, G.; Berto, F.; Weber, Z. 2024. Dialetheism. In: Edward N. Zalta (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Summer 2024 Edition). {https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2024/entries/dialetheism/.

Sainsbury R. M. 2009. Paradoxes. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Szmuc, D.; Pailos, F.; Barrio, E. 2018. What is a paraconsistent logic? In: W. Carnielli; J. Malinowski (eds.) Contradictions, from Consistency to Inconsistency, pp.89--108. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

Publicado

2025-07-17

Número

Sección

Special Issue on the Interpretation of Paraconsistent Logics