Outline of a Neurophilosophical Exploration of Attention
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2026.e105883Palavras-chave:
Attention, Neurophilosophy, Biogenic Approaches, Active Inference, Radical EmbodimentResumo
This article outlines a non-reductive neurophilosophical exploration of attention, arguing that its current scientific study is marked by ambiguities and internal inconsistencies. We propose that dominant reductive and anthropocentric assumptions have led contemporary research on attention into conceptual dead ends—including an overreliance on so-called “analytical approaches”, rigid dichotomies, and circular reasoning—that continue to obstruct the formulation of a coherent scientific definition of the phenomenon. To address these challenges, we advocate for the use of non-reductive biogenic frameworks, suggesting that attention be reconceptualized as a complex and embodied process, essential for organisms to regulate adaptive behavior and maintain thermodynamic equilibrium. Ultimately, this article seeks to promote more robust neurophilosophical investigations of attention, integrating insights from neuroscience, psychology, and evolutionary biology, while emphasizing the indispensable role of philosophical reflection in advancing scientific understanding.
Referências
Andersen, R. et al. 1997. Multimodal representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex and its use in planning movements. Annual Review of Neuroscience 20: 303-330.
Anderson, B. 2011. Attention and integration. In C. Mole et al. (Eds.), Attention: Philosophical and Psychological Essays, p.24-59. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Anderson, B. 2023. Stop paying attention to “attention.” WIREs Cognitive Science 14(1): e1574. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1574.
Anderson, M. & Chemero, A. 2017. The Brain Evolved to Guide Action. In: S. Shepherd (Ed.), The Wiley Handbook of Evolutionary Neuroscience, p.1-20. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Baghdadi, G. & Rajabi, M. 2021. Neurocognitive mechanisms of attention: Computational models, physiology, and disease states. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press.
Barrett, L. 2020. Thinking outside the head: Cognitive ecologies and evolutionary psychology. In: L. Workman et al. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of evolutionary perspectives on human behavior, p.194-205. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Basso, M. & May, P. 2017. Circuits for action and cognition: A view from the superior colliculus. Annual Review of Vision Science 3: 197-226.
Broadbent, D. 1958. Perception and communication. New York: Pergamon Press.
Cajal, S. 1904. Histology of the nervous system. New York: Oxford University Press.
Carruthers, P. 2020. How mindreading might mislead cognitive science. Journal of Consciousness Studies 27(7–8): 195-219.
Chang, V. et al. 2004. The effects of a mindfulness-based stress reduction program on stress, mindfulness self-efficacy, and positive states of mind. Stress and Health 20(3): 141-147.
Cherry, E. 1953. Some Experiments on the Recognition of Speech, with One and with Two Ears. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 25(5): 975-979.
Cisek, P. 2007. Cortical mechanisms of action selection: The affordance competition hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 362: 1585-1599.
Cisek, P. 2019. Resynthesizing behavior through phylogenetic refinement. Atten. Percept. Psychophys 81: 2265-2287.
Corbetta, M. et al. 1998. A common network of functional areas for attention and eye movements. Neuron 21:761-773.
Corcoran, A. et al. 2020. From allostatic agents to counterfactual cognisers: Active inference, biological regulation, and the origins of cognition. Biology & Philosophy 35(3): 32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-020-09746-2.
Corris, A. 2020. Organism-Environment Codetermination: The Biological Roots of Enactivism. Cincinnati: University of Cincinnati.
Dennett, D. 1998. A Perigosa Ideia de Darwin. Rio de Janeiro: Rocco.
Di Lollo, V. 2018. Attention is a sterile concept: iterative reentry is a fertile substitute. Consciousness and Cognition 64: 45-49.
Divjak, D. 2019. Frequency in Language: Memory, Attention and Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Frank, A. et al. 2024. The blind spot: Why science cannot ignore human experience. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Friston, K. 2005. A theory of cortical responses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 360(1456): 815-836.
Friston, K. 2010. The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory?. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 11(2): 127-138.
Gallen, C. et al. 2023. Contribution of sustained attention abilities to real-world academic skills in children. Scientific Reports 13(1): 2673. https://10.1038/s41598-023-29427-w
Gardner, R. & Gardner, B. 1969. Teaching Sign Language to a Chimpanzee. Science 165(3894): 664-672.
Giraldo-Luque, S. et al. 2020. The Struggle for Human Attention: Between Abuse of Social Media and Digital Wellbeing. Healthcare 8(4): 497. https://10.3390/healthcare8040497
Gouveia, S. 2022. Philosophy and Neuroscience: A Methodological Analysis. New York: Springer.
Guo, Z. 2022. Attention: A Preliminary History of the Philosophical Topic From Homer to Aristotle. Oslo: Universitetet i Oslo.
Helmholtz, H. 1924 [1867]. Handbuch der physiologischen Optik. Leipzig: Voss.
Hohwy, J. 2013. The predictive mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hommel, B. et al. 2019. No one knows what attention is. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 81(7): 2288-2303.
Hubálek, M. 2021. A Brief (Hi)Story of Just-So Stories in Evolutionary Science. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 51(5): 447-468.
James, W. 1890. The Principles of Psychology. New York: Dover Publications.
Jennings, C. 2020. The Attending Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kandel, D. et al., 2021. Principles of Neural Science. (6th edition). New York: McGraw Hill / Medical.
Kelty-Stephen, D. et al. 2022. In search for an alternative to the computer metaphor of the mind and brain. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2206.04603;
Lacalli, T. 2018. Amphioxus, motion detection, and the evolutionary origin of the vertebrate retinotectal map. Evolutionary Development Biology 19(9): 6.
Linson, A. et al. 2018. The Active Inference Approach to Ecological Perception: General Information Dynamics for Natural and Artificial Embodied Cognition. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 5: 21. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00021
Maturana, H. 1987. Everything is said by an observer. In: W. Thompson (Ed.), Gaia: A way of knowing. New York: Lindisfarne Press: 65-82.
Mole, C. 2011a. Attention is cognitive unison: An essay in philosophical psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mole, C. 2011b. The Metaphysics of Attention. In: C. Mole et al. (Eds.), Attention: Philosophical and Psychological Essays, p.60-77. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mole, C. 2025. Attention. In: E. Zalta; U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2025). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2025/entries/attention/
Müller, F. 1879. The Upanishads. Oxford: The Clarendon.
Nobre, A. 2018. Attention. In: J. Wixted; J. Serences (Eds.), Steven’s Handbook of Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, p.241-316. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Nobre, A. & Kastner, S. (Eds.). 2014. The Oxford handbook of attention. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Parvizi-Wayne, D. 2024. How preferences enslave attention: Calling into question the endogenous/exogenous dichotomy from an active inference perspective. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-024-10028-5
Pessoa, L. et al. 2021. Refocusing neuroscience: moving away from mental categories and towards complex behaviours. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 377(1844): 37720200534.
Pezzulo, G. & Friston, K. 2022. The evolution of brain architectures for predictive coding and active inference. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 377(1844): 20200531.
Pigliucci, M. 2019. Causality and the Role of Philosophy of Science. In: T. Uller; K. Lala (Eds.), Evolutionary Causation: Biological and Philosophical Reflections, p.13-28. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Pigliucci, M. 2020. The Tension between Scientific Knowledge and Common-Sense Philosophy. In: R. Peels; R. Woudenberg (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Common-Sense Philosophy, p.310-322. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Povinelli, D. 2000. Folk Physics for Apes: The Chimpanzee’s Theory of How the World Works. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Prinz, J. 2012. The Conscious Brain: How Attention Engenders Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
`
Ramstead, M. et al., 2018. Answering Schrödinger's question: A free-energy formulation. Physics of Life Reviews 24: 1-16.
Rosenholtz, R. 2024. Visual Attention in Crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences: 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X24000323
Silk, J. et al. 2005. Chimpanzees are indifferent to the welfare of unrelated group members. Nature 437: 1357-1359.
Sims, M. 2021. A continuum of intentionality: Linking the biogenic and anthropogenic approaches to cognition. Biology & Philosophy 36(6): 51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-021-09827-w
Stevens, C. & Bavelier, D. 2011. The role of selective attention on academic foundations: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience 2(Suppl 1): S30–S48.
Stewart, J. et al. 2010. Enaction: Toward a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Thompson, E. 2010. Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology and the Sciences of Mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Treisman, A. 1964. The Effect of Irrelevant Material on the Efficiency of Selective Listening. The American Journal of Psychology 77(4): 533.
van Fraassen, B. 1999. The Manifest Image and the Scientific Image. In: D. Aerts et al. (Eds.), Einstein Meets Magritte: An Interdisciplinary Reflection on Science, Nature, Art, Human Action and Society, vol.1, p.29-52. Dordrecht: Springer.
Varela, F. 1979. Principles of biological autonomy. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Waal, F. & Ferrari, P. 2010. Towards a bottom-up perspective on animal and human cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14(5): 201-207.
Waade, P. 2020. Confucian Free Energy: The Predictive Mind in Ancient China. PsyArXiv Preprints: 1-22.
Watzl, S. 2011.The Nature of Attention. Philosophy Compass 6(11): 842-853.
Watzl, S. 2017. Structuring mind: The nature of attention and how it shapes consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wu, W. 2014. Attention. London: Routledge;
Wundt, W. 1874/1948. Grundzüge de physiologischen psychologie. Leipzig: Engelmann.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Maria Luiza Iennaco
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
A obra Principia de http://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/index foi licenciada com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional.
Com base na obra disponível em www.periodicos.ufsc.br.
