What Is a serious discourse?

André Leclerc

doi:10.5007/1808-1711.2024.e96734

Autores

André Leclerc Universidade de Brasília https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4823-5883

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2024.e96734

Palavras-chave:

Serious Discourse, Fictional Discourse, Illocutionary Act, Expectation, Perlocutionary Plan

Resumo

Serious discourse is regularly opposed to fictional discourse. But what is serious discourse? Fictional discourse is ubiquitous and raises challenging questions to philosophical semantics. How to define serious discourse in a non-circular way? I use action theory and speech acts theory to propose an analysis of what a serious discourse is. The notion of expectation is central, as well as that of satisfaction: in serious discourse, we expect the satisfaction of illocutionary act and of perlocutionary plans.

Referências

Beaney, M. (Ed.). 1997. The Frege Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.

Conan Doyle, A. 2015. Silver Blaze. In: The Memoirs of Sherlock Holmes. The Complete Sherlock Holmes. New York: Barnes & Noble.

Evans, G. 1982. The Varieties of Reference. J. McDowell (ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Frege, G. 1892. On Sinn and Bedeutung. In: M. Beaney (ed.) The Frege Reader, 151-172. Oxford: Blackwell.

Frege, G. 1918. Thought. In: M. Beaney (ed.) The Frege Reader, 325-345. Oxford: Blackwell.

Goldman, A. 1970. A Theory of Human Action. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

Recanati, F. 2021. Fictional Reference as Simulation. In: E. Maier & A. Stokke (Ed.), The Language of Fiction, 17-26. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Searle, J. 1969. Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Searle, J. & Vanderveken, D. 1985. Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.