Comparison of worker’s health promotion interventions: cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors

  • Antonio Jose Grande Universidade Metodista de Piracicaba. Programa de Pós-gradução em Educação Física. Piracicaba, SP. Brasil.
  • Valter Silva Universidade Metodista de Piracicaba. Programa de Pós-graduação em Medicina Interna e Terapêutica. Piracicaba, SP. Brasil
  • Luciane Manzatto Universidade Metodista de Piracicaba. Programa de Pós-gradução em Educação Física. Piracicaba, SP. Brasil.
  • Túlio Brandão Xavier Rocha Universidade Metodista de Piracicaba. Programa de Pós-gradução em Educação Física. Piracicaba, SP. Brasil.
  • Gustavo Celestino Martins Universidade Metodista de Piracicaba. Programa de Pós-gradução em Educação Física. Piracicaba, SP. Brasil.
  • Guanis de Barros Vilela Junior Universidade Metodista de Piracicaba. Programa de Pós-gradução em Educação Física. Piracicaba, SP. Brasil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-0037.2013v15n1p27

Abstract

This study compared different strategies to improve occupational health and evaluated their impact on some quality of life domains (health, physical activity, occupational environment, and perception of quality of life). This cluster randomized controlled clinical trial enrolled 172 men and women aged 26.10 ± 6.03 who worked in the administrative department of 4 companies. The interventions lasted three months. Employees in company A (EA) received workplace exercises (WE) and educational interventions (EI) (posters with healthcare and quality of life recommendations and computer messages); in Company B (EB), only WE; in company C (EC), only EI; and in company D (ED), employees formed a control group. A quality of life and health (QVS-80) questionnaire was used for all assessments. The Wilcoxon test was used to compare quality of life before and after interventions, and the Kruskal-Wallis test (p ? 0.05), for each quality of life domain. The scores for occupational environment increased in companies A and B (p <0.01), which suggests that WE may improve the occupational environment.

Published

2013-01-02

Issue

Section

Original Articles