Maximal and anaerobic threshold cardiorespiratory responses during deepwater running

Authors

  • Ana Carolina Kanitz Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.
  • Thaís Reichert Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.
  • Giane Veiga Liedtke Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.
  • Stephanie Santana Pinto Universidade Federal de Pelotas.
  • Cristine Lima Alberton Universidade Federal de Pelotas.
  • Amanda Haberland Antunes Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.
  • Eduardo Lusa Cadore Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.
  • Luiz Fernando Martins Kruel Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-0037.2015v17n1p41

Abstract

Aquatic exercises provide numerous benefits to the health of their practitioners. To secure these benefits, it is essential to have proper prescriptions to the needs of each individual and, therefore, it is important to study the cardiorespiratory responses of different activities in this environment. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the cardiorespiratory responses at the anaerobic threshold (AT) between maximal deep-water running (DWR) and maximal treadmill running (TMR). In addition, two methods of determining the AT (the heart rate deflection point [HRDP] and ventilatory method [VM]) are compared in the two evaluated protocols. Twelve young women performed the two maximal protocols. Two-factor ANOVA for repeated measures with a post-hoc Bonferroni test was used (? < 0.05). Significantly higher values of maximal heart rate (TMR: 33.7 ± 3.9; DWR: 22.5 ± 4.1 ml.kg?1.min?1) and maximal oxygen uptake (TMR: 33.7 ± 3.9; DWR: 22.5 ± 4.1 ml.kg?1.min?1) in TMR compared to the DWR were found. Furthermore, no significant differences were found between the methods for determining the AT (TMR: VM: 28.1 ± 5.3, HRDP: 26.6 ± 5.5 ml.kg?1.min?1; DWR: VM: 18.7 ± 4.8, HRDP: 17.8 ± 4.8 ml.kg?1.min?1). The results indicate that a specific maximal test for the trained modality should be conducted and the HRDP can be used as a simple and practical method of determining the AT, based on which the training intensity can be determined

 

Author Biographies

Ana Carolina Kanitz, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre, RS

Thaís Reichert, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre, RS

Giane Veiga Liedtke, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre, RS

Stephanie Santana Pinto, Universidade Federal de Pelotas.

Universidade Federal de Pelotas. Pelotas, RS.

Cristine Lima Alberton, Universidade Federal de Pelotas.

Universidade Federal de Pelotas. Pelotas, RS.

Amanda Haberland Antunes, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre, RS

Eduardo Lusa Cadore, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre, RS

Luiz Fernando Martins Kruel, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre, RS

Downloads

Published

2014-12-29

Issue

Section

Original Articles