Analysis of the Physiological and Metabolic Responses between Two Types of Training in Wistar Rats
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-0037.2020v22e74189Abstract
This study analyzed the responses of 24 sessions of High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) and Continuous Moderate (CM) on tissue damage, oxidative stress and glycemic profile of rats in liquid medium. Twenty-four Wistar rats participated, divided into three groups: sedentary (GSED), the one who performed the HIIT (GHIIT) and the one who performed the CM (GCM). Performed three times a week alternately for 8 weeks, and the GHIIT performed 20 seconds of exercise for 10 rest. The CM was a moderate intensity swim. GHIIT increased creatine kinase compared to GSED (GSED: 140.40 + 35.48 U / I; GHIIT: 442.60 + 8.35 U / I; p = 0.0008, representing a percentage increase of 215.24); lactate dehydrogenase was increased in GHIIT and GCM compared to GSED (GSED: 112.8 + 28.08 U / I; GHIIT: 250.9 + 70.67 U / I, a percentage increase of 122.42; GCM: 241.8 + 100.70 U / I, with a percentage increase 114.36; p = 0.006), in contrast, GHIIT increased non-oxidized liver sulfhydryls compared to GCM (GHIIT: 498.70 + 214.30 nmol / ml; GCM: 270.50 + 104.40 nmol / ml, the percentage change was 84.36; p = 0.03). There was greater glycemic maintenance in the GCM (p = 0.0002). It is concluded that the protocols of HIIT and CM, of this study, point to a possible tissue injury, in contrast, HIIT develops the adaptive capacity of the hepatic antioxidant system and the CM promotes greater glycemic support.
References
Thompson WR. Worldwide survey of fitness trends for 2019: the CREP edition. Med Sci Sports Exerc: Health Fitness J 2018; 22(6): 10-17.
Batacan Jr RB, Duncand MJ, Dalboa VJ, Connolly KJ, Fenning AS. Light Intensity and High Intensity Interval Training Improve Cardiometabolic Health in Rats. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2016; 41(9): 945-52.
Cassidy S, Thoma C, Houghton D, Trenell M. High-intensity interval training: a review of its impact on glucose control and cardiometabolic health. Diabetologia 2017; 60:7–23.
Abe T, Kitaoka Y, Kikuchi DM, Takeda K, Numata O, Takemasa T. High-intensity interval training-induced metabolic adaptation coupled with an increase in Hif1alpha and glycolytic protein expression. J Appl Physiol 2015; 119(11):1297-302.
Dos Santos JL, Dantas REA, Lima CA, De Araújo SS, De Almeida EC, Marçal AC, et al. Protective effect of a hydroethanolic extract from Bowdichia virgilioides on muscular damage and oxidative stress caused by strenuous resistance training in rats. J Int Soc Sports Nutr 2014; 11(1):58.
Paraíso LF. Efeito do exercício físico na estabilidade de membrana de eritrócitos. [Tese de doutorado - Programa de Pós-Graduação em Genética e Bioquímica]. Uberlândia (MG): Universidade Federal de Uberlândia; 2015.
Souza LMV. Efeitos do treinamento intervalado de alta intensidade de curto prazo sobre os biomarcadores de estresse oxidativo e danos musculares em ratos. [Dissertação de Mestrado em Educação Física- Programa de Pós Graduação em Educação Física]. Sergipe (SE): Universidade Federal de Sergipe; 2018.
Marangon l, Gobatto CA, Mello MAR, Kokubun E. Utilization of an hyperbolic model for the determination of the critical load in swimming rats. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002; 34(5): S149.
Simões HG, Campbell CSG, Kokubun E, Denadai BS, Baldissera V. Determination of maximal lactate steady state velocity: coincidence with lower blood glucose. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1996; 28: S68-S77.
Simões HG. Comparação entre protocolos de determinação do limiar anaeróbio em testes de pista para corredores. [Dissertação de Mestrado em Ciências Fisiológicas - Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde]. São Paulo (SP): Universidade Federal de São Carlos. São Paulo; 1997.
Delevatti RS, Kanitz AC, Alberton CL, Marson EC, Pantoja PD, Pinho CDF, et al. Glycemic Threshold as an Alternative Method to Identify the Anaerobic Threshold in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. Front Physiol 2018; 9:1609.
