The influence of gender and age on foot structure and plantar pressure in asymptomatic adults
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-0037.2023v25e86693Keywords:
Adults, Gait analysis, PressureAbstract
The aim of the study was identify the influence of gender and age of healthy adults on the foot structure and the plantar pressure during gait. Sample comprising 608 women and men participants. To identify the structure of the foot, anthropometric measurements of both the total and the truncated length of the foot, the width of the forefoot, and the heights of the back and navicular were taken. Peak pressure and plantar contact area in three foot-masks (forefoot, middle foot, and hindfoot) were considered markers of plantar pressure. The data were analyzed by two-way variance analysis. No significant influence of age on the foot structure dimensions was identified; however, women presented measures equivalent to the five significantly smaller anthropometric markers. As for the peak plantar pressure, both males and females showed statistically similar values, but significant differences were observed for age. As to the plantar contact area, while age did not have significant influence, men showed significantly higher values in the three foot-masks. The findings suggest that gender influences the foot structure and the plantar contact area, while age influences the peak of plantar pressure.
References
McKay MJ, Baldwin JN, Ferreira P, Simic M, Vanicek N, Wojciechowski E, et al. Spatiotemporal and plantar pressure patterns of 1000 healthy individuals aged 3-101 years. Gait Posture 2017;58:78-87. http://doi.org/10.1016/ /j.gaitpost.2017 .07.004.
Demirbüken İ, Özgül B, Timurtaş E, Yurdalan SU, Çekin MD, Polat MG. Gender and age impact on plantar pressure distribution in early adolescence. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2019;53(3):215-220. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aott. 2019.01.006.
Buldt AK, Allan JJ, Landorf KB, Menz HB. The relationship between foot posture and plantar pressure during walking in adults: A systematic review. Gait Posture 2018;62:56-67. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.02.026
Tománková K, Přidalová M, Svoboda Z, Cuberek R. Evaluation of Plantar pressure distribution in relationship to body mass index in Czech women during walking. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2017;107(3):208‐214. http://doi.org/10.7547/ 15-143.
Štefan L, Kasović M, Zvonar M. Association between the levels of physical activity and plantar pressure in 6-14-year-old children. PeerJ 2020;8:e8551. http://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8551.
Gimunová M, Zvonař M, Mikeska O. The effect of aging and gender on plantar pressure distribution during the gait in elderly. Acta Bioeng Biomech 2018;20(4):139‐144. http://dx.doi.org/10.5277/ABB-01158-2018-02.
Chung MJ, Wang MJ. Gender and walking speed effects on plantar pressure distribution for adults aged 20-60 years. Ergonomics 2012;55(2):194-200. http://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2011.583359.
Stanković K, Booth BG, Danckaers F, Burg F, Vermaelen P, Duerinck S, et al. Three-dimensional quantitative analysis of healthy foot shape: a proof of concept study. J Foot Ankle Res 2018;11:8. http://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-018-0251-8.
Saghazadeh M, Kitano N, Okura T. Gender differences of foot characteristics in older Japanese adults using a 3D foot scanner. J Foot Ankle Res 2015;8:29. http://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-015-0087-4
Xu M, Hong Y, Li JX, Wang L. Foot Morphology in Chinese School Children Varies by Sex and Age. Med Sci Monit 2018;24:4536-4546. http://doi.org/10.1265
/MSM.906030.
Sacco ICN, Onodera AN, Bosch K, Rosenbaum D: Comparisons of foot anthropometry and plantar arch indices between German and Brazilian children. BMC Pediatr 2015;15:1-6. http://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-015-0321-z.
Tomassoni D, Traini E, Amenta F. Gender and age related diferences in foot morphology. Maturitas 2014;79(4):421-427. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.20
07.019.
Krauss I, Langbein C, Horstmann T, Grau S. Sex-related differences in foot shape of adult Caucasians – a follow-up study focusing on long and short feet. Ergonomics 2011;54:294-300. http://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2010.547605.
Redmond AC, Crosbie J, Ouvrier RA. Development and validation of a novel rating system for scoring standing foot posture: The Foot Posture Index. Clin Biomech 2006;21(1):89-98. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.08.002.
Aquino MRC, Avelar BS, Silva PL, Ocarino JM, Resende RA. Reliability of Foot Posture Index individual and total scores for adults and older adults. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2018;36:92-95. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2018.02.
Williams DS, McClay IS. Measurements used to characterize the foot and the medial longitudinal arch: reliability and validity. Phys Ther 2000;80(9):864-871. http://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/80.9.864.
Bus SA, de Lange A. A comparison of the 1-step, 2-step, and 3-step protocols for obtaining barefoot plantar pressure data in the diabetic neuropathic foot. Clin Biomech. 2005;20(9):892–899. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.05.004
Meyers-Rice B, Sugars L, McPoil TG, Cornwall MW. Comparison of three methods for obtaining plantar pressures in nonpathologic subjects. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1994;84:499–504. http://doi.org/10.7547/87507315-84-10-499.
Chevalier TL, Hodgins H, Chockalingam N. Plantar pressure measurements using an in-shoe system and a pressure platform: a comparison. Gait Posture 2010;31(3):397-399. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.11.016.
Tong JW, Kong PW. Association between foot type and lower extremity injuries: systematic literature review with meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2013;43(10):700-714. http://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2013.4225.
Kouchi M. Foot Dimensions and Foot Shape: Differences Due to Growth. Anthropol Sci 1998;106:161-188. http://doi.org/10.1537/ase.106. Supplement_
Aml A, Peker T, Turgut H, Ulukent S. An examination of the relationship between foot length, foot breadth, ball girth, height and weight of Turkish university students aged between 17 and 25. Anthropol Anz. 1997;55(1):79-87.
http://doi.org/10.1127/anthranz/55/1997/79
Paiva de Castro A, Rebelatto JR, Aurichio TR. The effect of gender on foot anthropometrics in older people. J Sport Rehabil 2011;20(3):277-286. http://doi. org/10.1123/jsr.20.3.277.
Mickle KJ, Munro BJ, Lord SR, Menz HB, Steele JR. Foot shape of older people: implications for shoe design. Footwear Science 2010;2(3):131-139. http://doi.org/10.1080/19424289.2010.487053.
Orlin MN, McPoil TG. Plantar pressure assessment. Phys Ther 2000;80: 399-409. http://doi.org/10.1093/pti/80.4.399.
Putti AB, Arnold GP, Abboud RJ. Foot pressure differences in men and women. Foot Ankle Surg 2010;16(1):21-24. http://doi.org/1016/j.fas.2009.03.005.
Murphy DF, Beynnon BD, Michelson JD, Vacek PM. Efficacy of plantar loading parameters during gait in terms of reliability, variability, effect of gender and relationship between contact area and plantar pressure. Foot Ankle Int 2005;26:171-179. http://doi.org/10.1177/107110070502600210.
Medina McKeon JM, Hertel J. Sex differences and representative values for 6 lower extremity alignment measures. J Athl Train 2009;44(3):249-255. http://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-44.3.249.
Nix S, Smith M, Vicenzino B. Prevalence of hallux valgus in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Foot Ankle Res 2010;3:21. http://doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-3-21.
