Occupational health and safety management systems: a systemic approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-0037.2024v26e91514Palabras clave:
Ergonomics, Occupational Safety, Performance Evaluation, Systematic ReviewResumen
Risks are intrinsic to any human activity. Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems (OHSMSs) are mechanisms designed to mitigate risks, protect workers, and ensure productivity. This study aimed to support researchers’ reflective analysis by examining scientific literature related to OHSMSs and identifying possibilities for future research with practical significance. Employing a qualitative approach, this systematic review was conducted using bibliographic procedures and action research. The intervention instrument ProKnow-C guided by a structured process from a constructivist perspective, was applied. A total of 3,130 studies were analyzed to select the bibliographic portfolio. The systemic analysis revealed that most articles neither demonstrate legitimacy nor consider companies’ particularities. The paper advances theoretical knowledge of OHSMSs by assessing relevant studies in the field, identifying evolution patterns, and highlighting gaps. A research agenda is proposed to guide the development of future models. We conclude that the challenges of designing ad hoc OHSMSs and incorporating the decision-makers’ knowledge throughout the process when addressed, have the potential to significantly contribute to the advancement of this field of knowledge.
Citas
Ledic J, Lu HY, da Silva DA, Moro ARP, Ensslin SR. Occupational health and safety management systems: opportunities and challenges: Sistemas de gestão de saúde e segurança no trabalho: oportunidades e desafios. Stud Eng Exact Sci. 2023;4(1):13-34.
Li YL, Guldenmund FW. Safety management systems: A broad overview of the literature. Saf Sci. 2018;103:94-123.
Fernandez-Muniz B, Montes-Peon JM, Vazquez-Ordas CJ. Relation between occupational safety management and firm performance. Saf Sci. 2009;47(7):980-91.
Korkusuz AY, Inan UH, Ozdemir Y, Basligil H. Evaluation of occupational health and safety key performance indicators using in healthcare sector. Sigma J Eng Nat Sci. 2018;36(3):705-15
İnan UH, Gül S, Yılmaz H. A multiple attribute decision model to compare the firms’ occupational health and safety management perspectives. Saf Sci. 2017;91:221-31.
Haas EJ, Yorio P. Exploring the state of health and safety management system performance measurement in mining organizations. Saf Sci. 2016;83:48-58.
Tremblay A, Badri A. Assessment of occupational health and safety performance evaluation tools: State of the art and challenges for small and medium-sized enterprises. Saf Sci. 2018;101:260-7.
Asadzadeh SM, Azadeh A, Negahban A, Sotoudeh A. Assessment and improvement of integrated HSE and macroergonomics factors by fuzzy cognitive maps: The case of a large gas refinery. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 2013;26(6):1015-26.
Köper B, Möller K, Zwetsloot G. The occupational safety and health scorecard - A business case example for strategic management. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2009;35(6):413-20.
Azadeh A, Farmand AH, Sharahi ZJ. Performance assessment and optimization of HSE management systems with human error and ambiguity by an integrated fuzzy multivariate approach in a large conventional power plant manufacturer. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 2012;25(3):594-603.
Podgorski D. Measuring operational performance of OSH management system - A demonstration of AHP-based selection of leading key performance indicators. Saf Sci. 2015;73:146-66.
Azadeh A, Rouzbahman M, Saberi M, Valianpour F. An adaptive algorithm for assessment of operators with job security and HSEE indicators. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 2014;31:26-40.
Azadeh A, Saberi M, Rouzbahman M, Valianpour F. A neuro-fuzzy algorithm for assessment of health, safety, environment and ergonomics in a large petrochemical plant. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 2015;34:100-14.
Martins CO, Michels G. Programas de promoção da saúde do trabalhador: exemplos de sucesso. Rev Bras Cineantropom Desempenho Hum. 2003;5(1):85-90.
Creswell JW. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. 4th ed: SAGE Publications, Inc; 2014.
Dutra A, Ripoll-Feliu VM, Fillol AG, Ensslin SR, Ensslin L. The construction of knowledge from the scientific literature about the theme seaport performance evaluation. Int J Product Perform Manage. 2015;64:243-69.
Rodrigues K, Matos LDS, Ensslin SR, Ensslin L, Dutra A, Mussi CC. Evaluation of public sector innovation: systematic review. Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления. 2023(5S1):165-88.
Welter LM, Ensslin SR. How do the unintended consequences of performance evaluation systems manifest themselves? J Acc Organ Chang. 2022;18(4):509-28.
Ensslin L, Gonçalves A, Ensslin SR, Dutra A. Bibliometric and systemic review of the state of the art of occupational risk management in the construction industry. Int J Occup Saf Ergonomics. 2023;29(3):1107-20.
Marafon AD, Ensslin L, de Oliveira Lacerda RT, Ensslin SR. The effectiveness of multi-criteria decision aid methodology. Eur J Innov Manage. 2015.
Ensslin, Giffhorn, Ensslin, Petri, Vianna. Performance evaluation of third party companies using the methodology of multicriteria decision support-constructivist. Pesq Oper. 2010;30(1):125-52.
Valmorbida SMI, Ensslin SR, Ensslin L. Performance measurement and management accounting: an integrative review of the literature to overcome the difficulties of practical application of performance evaluation in organizational management. Rev Contabilidade Gestão Governança. 2018;21(3):339-60.
Roy B. Decision science or decision-aid science? Eur J Oper Res. 1993;66(2):184-203.
Dias LC, Tsoukiàs A, editors. On the constructive and other approaches in decision aiding. Proceedings of the 57th meeting of the EURO MCDA working group; 2003.
Ensslin, Dezem V, Dutra A, Ensslin SR, Somensi K. Seaport-performance tools: an analysis of the international literature. Marit Econ Logist. 2018;20(4):587-602.
Landry M, Banville C, Oral M. Model legitimisation in operational research. Eur J Oper Res. 1996;92(3):443-57.
Thiel GG, Ensslin SR, Ensslin L. Street lighting management and performance evaluation: opportunities and challenges. Lex Localis. 2017;15(2):303.
Amir-Heidari P, Maknoon R, Taheri B, Bazyari M. A new framework for HSE performance measurement and monitoring. Saf Sci. 2017;100:157-67.
Stevens SS. On the theory of scales of measurement. Science. 1946;103(2684):677-80
Redinger CF, Levine SP, Blotzer MJ, Majewski MP. Evaluation of an occupational health and safety management system performance measurement tool II: Scoring methods and field study sites. Aihaj. 2002;63(1):34-40.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Direitos Autorais para artigos publicados nesta revista são do autor, com direitos de primeira publicação para a revista. Em virtude da aparecerem nesta revista de acesso público, os artigos são de uso gratuito, com atribuições próprias, em aplicações educacionais e não-comerciais, desde que seja dada a atribuição. Esta obra foi licenciada com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional - CC BY
