Novas tendências na prática do tratado do direito internacional do investimento: onde fica a América Latina?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2018v39n79p9Resumo
Os posicionamentos dos países latino-americanos no que se refere a regulações deinvestimentos internacionais sofreram uma recente revolução. Durante os anos de 1990, essespaíses assinaram diversos Tratados Bilaterais de Investimentos (TBIs), tornaram-se signatários da Convenção de Washington e, atualmente, tomam frente em um processo de reanálise do sistema legal que permeia os TBIs. Suas recentes práticas de negociação são bons exemplos do surgimento de uma nova geração de tratados de investimentos. Nesse sentido, a análise das cláusulas principais do Protocolo do Mercosul revela a intenção de fortemente limitar a extensão de tratamento e de proteção garantida a investidores estrangeiros.Referências
BOLIVAR, G. Sovereignty v. Investment Protection: back to Calvo? ICSID Review, [S.l.], p. 464-488, 2009.
CHARLOTIN, D.; PETERSON, L. E. In new Mercosur Investment Protocol, Brazil, Uruguay, Paraguay and Argentina radically pare back protections, and exclude investor-state arbitration. Investment Arbitration Reporter, [S.l.], May 4, 2017.
DAHLQUIST, J. Brazil and India conclude bilateral investment treaty. International Arbitration Reporter, [S.l.], November 28, 2016.
DE LUCA, A. Indirect expropriations and regulatory takings: what role for the “legitimate expectations” of foreign investors? In: SACERDOTI, G. et al. (Ed.). General Interests ofHost States in International Investment Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. p. 58-75.
DOLZER, R.; SCHREUER, C. Principles of International Investment Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
DOLZER, R.; STEVENS, M. Bilateral Investment Treaties. The Hague, 1995.
GIUPPONI, M. G. O. The Protection of Foreign Direct Investment in Latin America: Where Do We Stand on International Arbitration? Journal of International Arbitration, [S.l.], p. 113-142, 2015.
KURTZ, J. Australia’s Rejection of Investor-State Arbitration: Causation, Omission and Implication. ICSID Review, [S.l.], p. 65-86, 2012.
LÓPEZ ORTIZ, A.; CAICEDO, J. J.; AHERN, W. Two Solutions for One Problem: Latin America's Reactions to Concerns over Investor-State Arbitration. Transnational Dispute Management, [S.l.], V. 13, issue 2, June 2016.
PETERSON, L. E. A look inside Argentina’s first new Bilateral Investment Treaty in 15 years. International Arbitration Reporter, [S.l.], December 13, 2016.
REINISCH, A. Putting the Pieces Together … an EU Model BIT? The Journal of World Investment & Trade, [S.l.], p. 696 f, 2014.
SACERDOTI , G. Bilateral Treaties and Multilateral Instruments on Investment Protection. Rec. Cours, [S.l.], v. 269, p. 255-460, 1997.
SACERDOTI, G. et al. (Ed.). General Interests of Host States in International Investment Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
SHAN, W.. From North-South Divide to Private-Public Debate: Revival of the Calvo Doctrine and the Changing Landscape in International Investment Law. Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, [S.l.], p. 631-664, 2007.
SORNARAJAH, M. The International Law on Foreign Investment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
TITI, C. Investment Arbitration in Latin America. Arbitration International, [S.l.], p. 357-386, 2014.
TRAKMAN, L.E. Investor State Arbitration or Local Courts: Will Australia Set a New Trend? Journal of World Trade, [S.l.], p. 83-120, 2012.
VALENTI, M. Le norme sul trattamento e la protezione degli investimenti nel TTIP. In: BILANCIA, P. (Ed.). I negoziati per il partenariato transatlantico sul commercio e gli investimenti. Kluwer: Cedam, 2015. p. 215-231.
VALENTI, M. The protection of general interests of host States in the application of the fair and equitable treatment standard. In: SACERDOTI, G. et al. (Ed.). General Interests of Host States in International Investment Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. p. 26-57.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
