An historical overview of signed language interpreting research: Featuring highlights of personal research

Autores

  • Jemina Napier Macquarie University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7968.2010v2n26p63

Resumo

In the last twenty-five years research into signed language interpreting has burgeoned as a sub-discipline of translation and interpreting studies. Grbic’s (2007) bibliometric analysis of signed language interpreting (SLI) research provides an interesting picture of the research that has been conducted over the years. In developing a database of SLI literature, Grbic analysed 908 research texts produced from 1970 to 2005. She found that that there was a significant increase in production over that time, which accelerated in the mid to late 1990s. The majority of texts were published as journal articles or in collections, and covered several key themes including discussions of settings and modes, professional issues, quality issues, ethics, role and socio-cultural issues, linguistic issues, cognitive issues and research issues. In her conclusion Grbic states "The data revealed that research into SL interpreting can contribute to the enhancement of knowledge and to the general understanding of interpreting as a topic of scientific research" (p.45) Thus in order to inform interpreting studies more generally, it is worth canvassing some of the key areas of SLI research. Drawing on two other articles (J. Napier, 2005, forthcoming), this article provides a selective overview of SLI research, then focuses on a key area of SLI research: educational interpreting, with some highlights from personal research studies on SLI in university lectures.

Biografia do Autor

Jemina Napier, Macquarie University

Lecturer, Coordinator, Auslan/English Interpreting program
Department of Linguistics,
Macquarie University, Sydney.

Downloads

Publicado

18-10-2010

Como Citar

Napier, J. (2010). An historical overview of signed language interpreting research: Featuring highlights of personal research. Cadernos De Tradução, 2(26), 63–97. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7968.2010v2n26p63