Adoção de Métodos Científicos como Componente Metodológica e sua explicação nas Dissertações Publicizadas entre 2010 e 2014 de um Programa de Pós-Graduação em Administração

Ruy Tadeu Mambrini Ribas; Luis Carlos Cancellier de Olivo

doi:10.5007/2175-8077.2016v18n44p81

Adoption of Scientific Methods as a Methodological Component and its Explicitation in the Dissertations of a Graduate Program in Administration Between 2010 and 2014

Authors

Ruy Tadeu Mambrini Ribas Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
Luis Carlos Cancellier de Olivo Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8077.2016v18n44p81

Abstract

This study seeks to highlight the importance of adopting certain methodological components to make an intellectual production truly scientific. Therefore, it briefly discusses the main “schools” of methodology – namely, inductive, deductive, hypothetical-deductive and dialectical – to then seek the thesis of one Graduate Program in Administration for statements – by the authors – about the adoption of one of these methods as paradigm for conducting the academic exhibition held. The research does not review the adequacy of the methodological choices nor the correct application of the methodos, but only the statement of methodological option or choice itself. It is a descriptive research, as to the purposes, and classified as to the means, as a case study. Analyzed all essays submitted between the years 2010 and 2014 it was possible to perceive the low adherence rate of the theses to specifically one of the scientific methods. In other words, the authors did not make explicit throughout their work if they defined (and thus followed) any methodological paths whatsoever.

Author Biographies

Ruy Tadeu Mambrini Ribas, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

Mestrando em Administração Universitária pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), é graduado em Direito pela mesma instituição (2014), onde também atua como Assistente em Administração.

Luis Carlos Cancellier de Olivo, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

Possui graduação em Direito (1998), mestrado em Direito (2001) e doutorado em Direito(2003), todos pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. É especialista em Gestão Universitária(UFSC, 2000) e Direito Tributário (CESUSC, 2002).É professor em regime de Dedicação Exclusiva, Associado II da UFSC. Ministra as disciplinas de Direito Administrativo II no curso de graduação e Seminário de Direito e Literatura na pós-graduação(PPGD). É professor de Direito Administrativo e Instituiçoes de Direito Público da Universidade Aberta do Brasil(UAB), desde 2006. É professor de Direito Público e Administrativo no Programa de Pós-Graduaçao em Administração Universitária da UFSC(PPGAU). Membro do Conselho Editorial da EdUFSC( 2009 a 2013). Chefiou o Departamento de Direito da UFSC (2009-2011) e presidiu a Fundação José Arthur Boiteux no período 2009-2010(www.funjab.ufsc.br). Diretor do Centro de Ciências Jurídicas da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (2012/).

Downloads

PDF/A (Português (Brasil))

Published

2016-04-25

How to Cite

Ribas, R. T. M., & de Olivo, L. C. C. (2016). Adoption of Scientific Methods as a Methodological Component and its Explicitation in the Dissertations of a Graduate Program in Administration Between 2010 and 2014. Revista De Ciências Da Administração, 1(1), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8077.2016v18n44p81

Download Citation

Issue

V.18 N.44 Abril de 2016

Section

Articles

License

The author must ensure:

that there is complete consensus among all co-authors to approve the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
that their work is original, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, these have been duly acknowledged.

Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. RCA reserves the right to use software or any other methods of plagiarism detection.

All submissions received for evaluation in the RCA journal are screened for plagiarism and self-plagiarism. Plagiarism identified in manuscripts during the evaluation process will result in the submission being archived. In the event of plagiarism being identified in a manuscript published in the journal, the Editor-in-Chief will conduct a preliminary investigation and, if necessary, retract it.

Authors grant RCA exclusive rights of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons (CC BY) 4.0 International License.

Authors are authorized to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository, on a personal website, publishing a translation, or as a chapter in a book), with an acknowledgement of its authorship and initial publication in this journal.

This license grants any user the right to:

Share – copy, download, print, or redistribute the material in any medium or format.

Adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

According to the following terms:

Attribution – You must give appropriate credit (cite and reference), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

No additional restrictions – You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.