Concepts on the fields and weapons of the competition model

Authors

  • Jose Celso Contador UNINOVE - Centro Universitário Nove de Julho

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8069.2008v10n21p147

Abstract

Up to now, the Fields and Weapons of the Competition Model has been publicized as a theoretical framework for many studies and, as such, it has appeared in a fragmented manner. Due to the level of consolidation the model has achieved, now is the time to present it integrally, so as to expose it to the appreciation of the scientific community dedicated to Corporate Strategy. Belonging to the Competitiveness theory and having scientific validity, the model is both qualitative and quantitative, and therefore presents some advantages over Porter’s model, as well as over the RBV and the Balanced Scorecard models. A simple idea has originated it: according to the customer’s interest, separating the so-called competitive advantages, so as to sort out those that interest him/her from those that do not. The first group consists of the fields of the competition; the latter corresponds to the weapons of the competition. The fields of the competition relate to the business´ competitive strategy, and the weapons of the competition related to the operational competitive strategies. This is the first of a series of three articles.

Author Biography

Jose Celso Contador, UNINOVE - Centro Universitário Nove de Julho

Engenheiro (1964) e Doutor em Engenharia (1973) pela USP, Professor Livre-Docente da UNESP (1993), é professor universitário há 40 anos, atuando no campo da Engenharia de Produção e da Administração. Atualmente, dedica-se à docência e pesquisa no Programa de Mestrado em Administração do Centro Universitário Nove de Julho - UNINOVE. Atualmente, dedica-se à pesquisa sobre Campos e Armas da Competição, tema inserido na Teoria da Competitividade Empresarial. http://lattes.cnpq.br/8042494962969772

Published

2008-01-01

How to Cite

Contador, J. C. (2008). Concepts on the fields and weapons of the competition model. Journal of Administration Science, 10(21), 147–174. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8069.2008v10n21p147

Most read articles by the same author(s)