Lógicas de ação de professores em administração: uma análise baseada na sociologia da ciência
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8077.2016v18n45p64Abstract
O objetivo deste artigo é iniciar um processo de explicitação, em base científica e numa perspectiva socioprofissional, das lógicas de ação e das estratégias utilizadas por professores de escolas de administração no Brasil. Com uma abordagem teórico-epistemológica, baseada na concepção de campo de Bourdieu e na sociologia pragmática francesa com Boltanski e Thévenot, foram realizadas entrevistas em profundidade e semiestruturadas com 20 docentes que atuam em escolas de administração, complementadas com a análise de documentos. Ao discutir as configurações e as categorias profissionais, a legitimação e o reconhecimento, as lógicas de ação por meio das habilidades sociais e estratégias no prisma das relações estabelecidas no cotidiano tornou-se possível iniciar uma reflexão crítica a respeito da posição do professor no campo. Foram identificadas duas configurações distintas – professor e professor-pesquisador – as quais apresentam estratégias competitivas e cooperativas diferentes. Legitimidade e reconhecimento, por exemplo, passam por estágios, títulos, espaços e “resultados” diferentes. Verificou-se, ainda, a presença de habilidades de natureza política e administrativa permeando o cotidiano.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Revista de Ciências da Administração

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author must ensure:
- that there is complete consensus among all co-authors to approve the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
- that their work is original, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, these have been duly acknowledged.
Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. RCA reserves the right to use software or any other methods of plagiarism detection.
All submissions received for evaluation in the RCA journal are screened for plagiarism and self-plagiarism. Plagiarism identified in manuscripts during the evaluation process will result in the submission being archived. In the event of plagiarism being identified in a manuscript published in the journal, the Editor-in-Chief will conduct a preliminary investigation and, if necessary, retract it.
Authors grant RCA exclusive rights of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons (CC BY) 4.0 International License.

Authors are authorized to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository, on a personal website, publishing a translation, or as a chapter in a book), with an acknowledgement of its authorship and initial publication in this journal.
This license grants any user the right to:
Share – copy, download, print, or redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
According to the following terms:
Attribution – You must give appropriate credit (cite and reference), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions – You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.