Environmental regulations and competitiveness: a comparative study between Brazil and France
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8077.2021.e61944Abstract
This study aimed to verify if there is any kind of association between the rigor of environmental regulations and the competitiveness of the countries Brazil and France, between 2005 and 2015, based on the results of the environmental policy stringency indicators (Environmental Policy Stringency Index, OECD) and competitiveness (Global Competitiveness Index, WEF). In addition, we sought to analyze the evolution of the rigor of environmental regulations and competitiveness. It is a qualitative and quantitative research, descriptively analyzing the variables under study and using Pearson's linear correlation statistical test. The results showed that France presented greater rigor in its environmental policies than Brazil and demonstrated a greater degree of competitiveness. In addition, environmental regulations in Brazil were negatively correlated with only three pillars of competitiveness, while France showed a correlation with eight pillars of competitiveness. The work contributes to the literature demonstrating the importance of strict environmental regulations for improving the performance of green industrial production.
References
AIGINGER, K. T. Competitiveness: From a Dangerous Obsession to a Welfare Creating Ability with Positive Externalities. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, v. 6, n. 2, p. 161-177, jun. 2006.
ANSOFF, H. I. Corporate strategy. Harmondsworth: Penguin. 1965.
APAK, Sudi; ATAY, Erhan. Global competitiveness in the EU through green innovation technologies and knowledge production. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 181, p. 207-217, 2015.
BALKYTE, A.; TVARONAVICIENE, M. Perception of competitiveness in the context of sustainable development: Facets of sustainable competitiveness. Journal of Business Economics and Management, v. 11, n. 2, p. 341-365, jun. 2011.
BRASIL. Ministério das Relações Exteriores. O Brasil no G-20. 2018. Disponível em: <http://www.itamaraty.gov.br/pt-BR/politica-externa/diplomacia-economica-comercial-e-financeira/15586-brasil-g20>. Acesso em: 25 out. 2018.
BORSATTO, Jaluza Maria Lima Silva; AMUI, Lara Bartocci Liboni. Green innovation: Unfolding the relation with environmental regulations and competitiveness. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, v. 149, p. 445-454, 2019.
CLEFF, T.; RENNINGS, K. Determinants of environmental product and process innovation. European environment, v. 9, n. 5, p. 191-201, 1999.
CONSTANTINI, V.; MAZZANTI, M. On the green and innovative side of trade competitiveness? The impact of environmental policies and innovation on EU exports. Research Policy, v. 41, n.1, p. 132-153, fev. 2012.
COSTA, R. S.; MARION, J. C. A Uniformidade na Evidenciação das Informações Ambientais. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, n. 43, p. 20-33, jan./abr. 2007.
DONAIRE, D. Gestão Ambiental na empresa. São Paulo: Atlas, 1995.
DRAPER, N. R.; SMITH, H. Applied regression analysis. 3. ed. New York: John Wiley e Sons, 1998.
FÁVERO, Luiz Paulo; BELFIORE, Patrícia. Manual de análise de dados: estatística e modelagem multivariada com Excel®, SPSS® e Stata®. Elsevier Brasil, 2017.
FÓRUM ECONÔMICO MUNDIAL – FEM. The Global Competitiveness Report. 2018. Disponível em: <http://www3.weforum.org/docs/GCR2017-2018/05FullReport/TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2017%E2%80%932018.pdf>. Acesso em: 03 nov. 2018.
FRONDEL, M.; HORBACH, J.; RENNINGS, K. End‐of‐pipe or cleaner production? An empirical comparison of environmental innovation decisions across OECD countries. Business strategy and the environment, v. 16, n. 8, p. 571-584, 2007.
HERCIU, M.; OGREAN, C. An Overview on European Union Sustainable Competitiveness. Procedia Economics and Finance, v. 16, p. 651–656, 2014.
IAMAGUCHI, T. E.; MARTINS DE SOUZA, M. C. França: A construção do direito ambiental em um país desenvolvido. Revista Tópos. v. 5, n. 2, p. 47-66, 2011.
JAFFE, A. B.; NEWELL, R. G.; STAVINS, R. N. A tale of two market failures: technology and environmental policy. Ecological Economics, v. 54, n. 2-3, p. 164-174, ago. 2005.
KEMP, R.; PONTOGLIO, S. The innovation effects of environmental policy instruments - A typical case of the blind men and the elephant? Ecological Economics, v. 72, p. 28-36, dez. 2011.
LIMA, M. L. B.; FROTA, J. A.; ARAÚJO, F. S. M.; FONTENELE, R. E. S. Desenvolvimento sustentável e competitividade nas nações: uma análise multivariada. Reuna, v. 22, n. 1, p. 41-62, 2017.
LIU, Lijun et al. Are Environmental Regulations Holding Back Industrial Growth? Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, p. 127007, 2021.
LUSTOSA, MARIA CECÍLIA JUNQUEIRA. Inovação e tecnologia para uma economia verde: questões fundamentais. Política Ambiental, v. 8, p. 111-122, 2011.
MARGULIS, S. A regulamentação ambiental: instrumentos e implementação (Texto para discussão, N° 437). Brasília, DF: IPEA, 1998.
NAÇÕES UNIDAS. Adoção do Acordo de Paris. 2015. Disponível em: <https://nacoesunidas.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Acordo-de-Paris.pdf>. Acesso em: nov. 2018.
PORTER, M. E. A vantagem competitiva das nações. Rio de Janeiro: Campus, 1989.
PORTER, M. E. America’s Green strategy. Scientific American, v. 264, n. 4, p. 168, abr. 1991.
PORTER, M. E. Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: The Free Press, 1985.
PORTER, M. E.; VAN DER LINDE, C. Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, v. 9, n. 4, p. 97-118, 1995.
REN, S., LI, X., YUAN, B., LI, D. & CHEN, X. The effects of three types of environmental regulation on ecoefficiency: A cross-region analysis in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 173, p. 245-255, fev. 2018.
REILLY, John M. Green growth and the efficient use of natural resources. Energy Economics, v. 34, p. S85-S93, 2012.
RUBASHKINA, Y.; GALEOTTI, M.; VERDOLINI, E. Environmental regulation and competitiveness: Empirical evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from European manufacturing sectors. Energy Policy, v. 83, p. 288-300, ago. 2015.
SCOONES, Ian; LEACH, Melissa; NEWELL, Peter (Ed.). The politics of green transformations. Routledge, 2015.
SILVEIRA, Juliane Dias Coelho de Araújo; OLIVEIRA, Murilo Alvarenga. Inovação e desempenho organizacional: um estudo com empresas brasileiras inovadoras. Sociedade, Contabilidade e Gestão, v. 8, n. 2, 2013.
STAVINS, R. N. Correlated uncertainty and policy instrument choice. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, v. 30, n. 2, p. 218-232, mar. 1996.
SUCHEK, Nathalia; FERNANDES, Paula; NASCIMENTO, Thiago Cavalcante. Empreendedorismo e competitividade: Aplicação de uma análise de cluster. In: XXX Jornadas Luso-Espanholas de Gestão Científica: cooperação transfronteiriça: desenvolvimento e coesão territorial: livro de resumos. Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, 2020. p. 125.
YU, Binbin; SHEN, Chen. Environmental regulation and industrial capacity utilization: An empirical study of China. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 246, p. 118986, 2020.
ZHANG, Yixiang et al. Environmental regulation, capital output and energy efficiency in China: An empirical research based on integrated energy prices. Energy Policy, v. 146, p. 111826, 2020.
ZHANG, Ming; SUN, Xinran; WANG, Wenwen. Study on the effect of environmental regulations and industrial structure on haze pollution in China from the dual perspective of independence and linkage. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 256, p. 120748, 2020.
ZHAO, X.; YIN, H.; ZHAO, Y. Impact of environmental regulations on the efficiency and CO2 emissions of power plants in China. Applied Energy, v. 149, p. 238-247, jul. 2015.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The author transfers all copyright of the article to Revista Ciências da Administração, with any reproduction, total or partial, in any means of publication, printed or electronic, being prohibited, without the prior and necessary authorization being requested and, if obtained, will include the competent registration and thanks to the Magazine.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional.
