Capital cultural e o subsídio às artes

Authors

  • Edinice Mei Silva UFSC - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/%25x

Abstract

Normally, there are two main arguments for public subsidy to the arts - merit good and public good. Briefly, the reasons given is that the arts have intrisic valves due to their especial nature;and that their consumption causes external positive benefits, there fore to support them is of public interest. However, the reasons put forward are not sustainable when questions aboutaccess to symbolic goods (arts) are taken into consideration. In this sense, the sociological concept of cultural capital becomes useful in better understanding the economic dimensions of supply and demand. The aim of throwing this flash of sociological light into the discussion is toarrive at a more reasonable grasp about the support to the production and consumption -supply and demand - of arts and the reQuired cultural capital for their access.

Author Biography

Edinice Mei Silva, UFSC - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

Graduação em Sociologia e Artes (Fotografia) pela State University of New York (1977), mestrado em Administração Pública pela University of Southern California (1980) e doutorado em Engenharia de Produção pela UFSC (2001). Atualmente é professor titular da UFSC.

Mais informações: Currículo Lattes - CNPq.

Published

1998-01-01

How to Cite

Silva, E. M. (1998). Capital cultural e o subsídio às artes. Journal of Administration Science, 1, 7–18. https://doi.org/10.5007/%x