Capital cultural e o subsídio às artes

Authors

  • Edinice Mei Silva UFSC - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/%25x

Abstract

Normally, there are two main arguments for public subsidy to the arts - merit good and public good. Briefly, the reasons given is that the arts have intrisic valves due to their especial nature;and that their consumption causes external positive benefits, there fore to support them is of public interest. However, the reasons put forward are not sustainable when questions aboutaccess to symbolic goods (arts) are taken into consideration. In this sense, the sociological concept of cultural capital becomes useful in better understanding the economic dimensions of supply and demand. The aim of throwing this flash of sociological light into the discussion is toarrive at a more reasonable grasp about the support to the production and consumption -supply and demand - of arts and the reQuired cultural capital for their access.

Author Biography

Edinice Mei Silva, UFSC - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

Graduação em Sociologia e Artes (Fotografia) pela State University of New York (1977), mestrado em Administração Pública pela University of Southern California (1980) e doutorado em Engenharia de Produção pela UFSC (2001). Atualmente é professor titular da UFSC.

Mais informações: Currículo Lattes - CNPq.

Downloads

Published

1998-01-01

How to Cite

Silva, E. M. (1998). Capital cultural e o subsídio às artes. Revista De Ciências Da Administração, 1, 7–18. https://doi.org/10.5007/%x

Issue

Ano 1 - Número 0 - Agosto de 1998

Section

Articles

License

The author must ensure:

  • that there is complete consensus among all co-authors to approve the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
  • that their work is original, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, these have been duly acknowledged.

Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. RCA reserves the right to use software or any other methods of plagiarism detection.

All submissions received for evaluation in the RCA journal are screened for plagiarism and self-plagiarism. Plagiarism identified in manuscripts during the evaluation process will result in the submission being archived. In the event of plagiarism being identified in a manuscript published in the journal, the Editor-in-Chief will conduct a preliminary investigation and, if necessary, retract it.

Authors grant RCA exclusive rights of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons (CC BY) 4.0 International License.

Authors are authorized to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository, on a personal website, publishing a translation, or as a chapter in a book), with an acknowledgement of its authorship and initial publication in this journal.

This license grants any user the right to:

Share – copy, download, print, or redistribute the material in any medium or format.

Adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

According to the following terms:

Attribution – You must give appropriate credit (cite and reference), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

No additional restrictions – You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.