Startups: a systematic review of literature and future research directions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8077.2021.e80666Abstract
The objective of the research is to map the literature based on a Systematic Literature Review on the theme of startups and to highlight some theoretical gaps based on publications of high-reputation scientific journals. The period from 1990 to 2019 was defined for the elaboration of this study. We use the excel spreadsheet, in addition to the HistCite ™, VOSviewer, IRATUMEQ, and R Studio packages. The results show that the typology of the startups evaluated, after reading 68% of the articles, organizations are characterized as a group of new companies, that is, relatively young and inexperienced when compared to the most stable and mature in organizational development. They refer to those that are in the initial stage and are susceptible to the influence of various factors, such as investors, supplier customers, partners, etc., and should think strategically about how to act and, this concerns a group of dynamic startups that work with innovations.
References
Almeida, C. P. B., & Goulart, B. N. G. (2017). Como minimizar vieses em revisões sistemáticas de estudos observacionais. Revista CEFAC, São Paulo, v. 19, n. 4, p. 551-555, ago. 2017. DOI: 10.1590/1982-021620171941117.
Audretsch, D. B. (1994). Business survival and the decision to exit. Journal of the Economics of Business, 1(1), 125-137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/758540503
Baldenius, T., & Meng, X. (2010). Signaling firm value to active investors. Review of Accounting Studies, 15(3), 584-619. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-010-9130-7
Bates, T. (1995). Analysis of survival rates among franchise and independent small business startups. Journal of Small Business Management, 33(2), 26.
de Almeida Biolchini, J. C., Mian, P. G., Natali, A. C. C., Conte, T. U., & Travassos, G. H. (2007). Scientific research ontology to support systematic review in software engineering. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 21(2), 133-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2006.11.006
Blank, S., & Dorf, B. (2012). The startup owner’s manual: The step-by-step guide for building a great company. K & S Ranch. Inc, California. PubMed Abstract OpenURL.
Camargo, B. V., & Justo, A. M. (2013). IRAMUTEQ: um software gratuito para análise de dados textuais. Temas em psicologia, 21(2), 513-518. ISSN: 1413-389X
Campanario, J. M. (2015). Providing impact: the distribution of JCR journals according to references they contribute to the 2-year and 5-year journal impact factors. Journal of Infometrics, v. 9, 398-407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.01.005
Conti, A., Thursby, J., Thursby, M. (2013). Patents as Signals for Startup Financing, The Journal of Industrial Economics, v. 61, John Wiley & Sons Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joie.12025
Cooper, B., & Vlaskovits, P. (2010). Entrepreneur’s Guide to Customer Development. ISBN-13: 978-0-9827436-0-7
Cressy, R. (1996). Are business startups debt-rationed? The economic journal, 106(438), 1253-1270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2235519
Crowne, M. (2002). Why software product startups fail and what to do about it. Evolution of software product development in startup companies. IEEE Xplore. 18-20 Aug. Doi: 10.1109/IEMC.2002.1038454.
Cohen, D. G.; Feld, B. (2010). Do More Faster: Techstars Lessons to Accelerate Your Startup. publisher: Wiley. October. ISBN: 1119583330, 9781119583332
Dahlstrand A. L. (2007). Technology-Based Entrepreneurship and Regional Development: The Case of Sweden. European Business Review. Bradford: 2007. Vol. 19, n. 5; p. 373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/
Del Bosco, B., Chierici, R., & Mazzucchelli, A. (2019). Fostering Entrepreneurship: An Innovative Business Model to Link Innovation and New Venture Creation. Review of Managerial Science, 13(3), 561-574. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-018-0318-8
Figueiredo, E. B., de Cássia Catini, R., & Mendes, L. M. (2018). Mineração de Textos: Análise de Sentimento em Redes Sociais-Revisão Sistemática. Anais do WCF, Vol 5, pp 24-29. ISSN 2447-4703
Goel, R. K., & Saunoris, J. W. (2017). Dynamics of Knowledge Spillovers From Patents to Entrepreneurship: Evidence Across Entrepreneurship Types. Contemporary Economic Policy, 35(4), 700–715. Doi:10.1111/Coep.12224.
Gutmann, T. (2019). Harmonizing corporate venturing modes: an integrative review and research agenda. Management Review Quarterly, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-018-0148-4.
Hermanson, B. (2011). O que é uma startup. São Paulo: Mundo Sebrae.
Herrero C. A., Sampedro, I. R. & Fernández‐Laviada, A. (2014). Entrepreneurial intention: perceived advantages and disadvantages. Academia Revista Latino americana de Administración, 27(2), 284–315. DOI:10.1108/arla-09-2013-0144.
Hwangbo, K.S. & Seo, W.S. (2014). The current status and improvement strategy of the Korean start-up accelerators, Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal. questia.com
Kent M. & Coker P. (1992). Vegetation Description and Analysis: A Practical Approach. Wiley, Baffins Lane, Chichester, West Sussex, UK, p. 363.
Kim, L. (2005). Da imitação à inovação: a dinâmica do aprendizado tecnológico da Coréia. Unicamp.
Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele, UK, Keele University, 33, 1-26.
Kollmann, T., Stöckmann, C., Hensellek, S., & Kensbock, J. (2016). European startup monitor 2016. Universität Duisburg-Essen Lehrstuhl für E-Business. ISBN: 978-3-938338-17-9
Kohler, T. (2016). Corporate accelerators: Building bridges between corporations and startups. Business Horizons, Vol. 59, No. 3, pp. 347-357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2016.01.008
Kretschmer, H., Liming, L., & Kundra, R. (2001). Foundation of a global interdisciplinary research network (COLLNET) with Berlin as the virtual centre. Scientometrics, 52(3), 531-537. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014268505676
Leydesdorff, L. (2009). How are new citation‐based journal indicators adding to the bibliometric toolbox? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(7), 1327-1336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21024
Longhi, F. (2011). A história da revolução das startups. Imasters. Disponível em: http://imasters. com. br/artigo/20027/mercado/a-historia-da-revolucao-das-startups. acedido em, 14.
Machado Junior, C., & Souza, M. T. S. de. (2016). The Laws of Bibliometrics in Different Scientific Databases. Revista de Ciências da Administração, 18(44). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2175-8077.2016v18n44p111
Manigart, S., Struyf, C. (1997). Financing High Technology Startups in Belgium: An Explorative Study. Small Business Economics 9, 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007967722346
Nager, M., Nelsen, C., & Nouyrigat, F. (2013). Startup Weekend: Como levar uma companhia do conceito à criação em 54h.
Oliveira, M. M. (2007). Como fazer pesquisa qualitativa. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes.
Padrão, L. C., & Andreassi, T. (2013). O desempenho de startups de base tecnológica: um estudo comparativo em regiões geográficas brasileiras. Revista da Micro e Pequena Empresa, 7(2).
Perin, B. (2015). A revolução das startups: o novo mundo do empreendedorismo de alto impacto. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Alta Books. 172p.
Ratinaud, P. (2009). IRAMUTEQ: Interface de R pour les Analyses Multidimensionnelles de Textes et de Questionnaires [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://www.iramuteq.org.
Ries, E. (2012). A Startup Enxuta. Leya.
Rivasa, J., Pereab, J.M., De-Pablos-Herederoc, C., Angonb, E., Barbab, C., & García, A. (2019). Canonical correlation of technological innovation and performance in sheep's dairy farms: Selection of a set of indicators. Agricultural Systems, v. 176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102665
Rompho, N. (2018). Operational performance measures for startups. Measuring Business Excellence. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MBE-06-2017-0028
Saemundsson R. J. (2004). Technical knowledge-seeking in a young and growing technologybased firm: incentives and direction. International Journal of Innovation Management. Vol. 8, n. 4; pp. 399–429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S136391960400112X
Saemundsson R. J. (2004). Technical knowledge-seeking in a young and growing technologybased firm: incentives and direction. International Journal of Innovation Management. Vol. 8, n. 4; pp. 399–429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S136391960400112X
Sampaio, R. F., & Mancini, M. C. (2007). Estudos de revisão sistemática: um guia para síntese criteriosa da evidência científica. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, 11(1), 83-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552007000100013
Sampedro, I. R., Fernández‐Laviada, A., & Crespo, Á. H. (2014). Entrepreneurial intention: perceived advantages and disadvantages. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ARLA-09-2013-0144
Sandelowski, M., Barroso, J., & Voils, C. I. (2007). Using qualitative metasummary to synthesize qualitative and quantitative descriptive findings. Research in nursing & health, 30(1), 99-111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20176
Schwab, K. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution. Currency. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v9n2p90
Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR). 2018. https://www.scimagojr.com/
Spender, J. C., Corvello, V., Grimaldi, M., & Rippa, P. (2017). Startups and open innovation: a review of the literature. European Journal of Innovation Management. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-12-2015-0131
Sunny, S. A., & Shu, C. (2019). Investments, incentives, and innovation: geographical clustering dynamics as drivers of sustainable entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 52(4), 905-927. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9941-z
Szerb, L., & Vörös, Z. (2019). The changing form of overconfidence and its effect on growth expectations at the early stages of startups. Small Business Economics, 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00297-9
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207-222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
Venkataraman S. (2004). Regional transformation through technological entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing. New York: vol. 19, n. 1; pp. 153-167.
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.04.001
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The author transfers all copyright of the article to Revista Ciências da Administração, with any reproduction, total or partial, in any means of publication, printed or electronic, being prohibited, without the prior and necessary authorization being requested and, if obtained, will include the competent registration and thanks to the Magazine.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional.