Collaboration and scientific production: an analysis of the Medicine co-authorship network in Colombia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2026.e106044Keywords:
Medical Sciences, Scientific Production, Science Networks, Co-authorship, ColombiaAbstract
Objective: To analyze the co-authorship network in medicine in Colombia between 2012 and 2022, in order to identify the most central authors and understand the role they play in the scientific collaboration network in
this field.
Methods: A descriptive, exploratory, and retrospective study was carried out on 23,549 articles indexed in
Scopus, with at least one author affiliated with a Colombian institution. Single-authored articles were excluded, and the analysis focused on publications with between 2 and 29 authors. The database was processed in RStudio, and network centrality metrics were calculated in Gephi. Subsequently, centrality measures, such as
betweenness, closeness, degree, and eigenvector, were applied, selecting the 25 most relevant authors in
each metric (Top-25).
Results: Five authors were identified as appearing in three of the four centrality metrics applied, which
evidences their prominent role within the network. The findings confirm that collaboration, rather than the
individual volume of publications, provides a better understanding of the strategic positions of authors in the
collective generation of knowledge.
Conclusions: The results show that scientific collaboration enhances productivity and efficiently connects the
actors in the network, configuring “small world” type structures where the relationships between similar authors
strengthen the collective generation of knowledge. This allows us to reflect on new rules in scientific
communication, where the co-authorship network becomes as relevant an indicator as the number of individual
publications.
Downloads
References
ABADÍA, A. A. Co-authorship networks and scholarly books: a methodological approach from a university press case study. Revista CS, Cali, n. 40, p. 103–142, 2023. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.18046/recs.i40.5858. Acceso en: 5 mar. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18046/recs.i40.5858
ABT, H. A. The future of single-authored papers. Scientometrics, Budapest, v. 73, n. 3, p. 353–358, dec. 2007. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1822-9. Acceso en: 9 mar. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1822-9
ALONSO-CIFUENTES, J. C.; CARABALI-MOQUERA, J. A. Breve tutorial para visualizar y calcular métricas de redes (grafos) en R (para económicas). Cali: Universidad Icesi, 2019. (Icesi Economics Lecture Notes, n. 7). Disponible en: https://ideas.repec.org/p/col/000559/018170.html. Acceso en: 31 mayo 2022.
ALONSO-CIFUENTES, J. C.; LARGO, M. F. Empezando a visualizar datos con R y ggplot2. 2. ed. Cali: Universidad Icesi, 2023. E-book. (Colección Herramientas del Big Data y Analytics, v. 3). Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.18046/EUI/bda.h.3.2. Acceso en: 17 jun. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18046/EUI/bda.h.3.2
BAJI, F.; MOSTAFAVI, I.; PARSAEI-MOHAMMADI, P.; SABAGHINEJAD, Z. Partnership ability and co-authorship network of information literacy field. Scientometrics, Budapest, v. 126, n. 9, p. 8205–8216, sep. 2021. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04062-2. Acceso en: 20 mayo 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04062-2
BAVELAS, A. Communication Patterns in Task-Oriented Groups. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, [s. l.], v. 22, n. 6, p. 725–730, nov. 1950. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1906679. Acceso en: 17 jun. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1906679
BLAND, C. J.; SEAQUIST, E.; PACALA, J. T.; CENTER, B.; FINSTAD, D. One schoolʼs strategy to assess and improve the vitality of its faculty. Academic Medicine, [s. l.], v. 77, n. 5, p. 368–376, may 2002. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200205000-00004. Acceso en: 17 jun. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200205000-00004
BLOCH, F.; JACKSON, M. O.; TEBALDI, P. Centrality measures in networks. Social Choice and Welfare, [s. l.], v. 61, n. 2, p. 413–453, aug. 2023. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-023-01456-4. Acceso en: 17 jun. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-023-01456-4
BONACICH, P. Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, Birkenhead, v. 2, n. 1, p. 113–120, 1972. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.1972.9989806. Acceso en: 17 jun. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.1972.9989806
BRAND MONSALVE, E. G.; CATAÑEDA PAREJA, I. N. Análisis de redes sociales: conceptos y técnicas para la investigación social. 1. ed. Medellín: Universidad de Antioquia, 2021. (FCSH Investigación). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1rnpj6k
CAÑEDO ANDALIA, R.; NODARSE RODRÍGUEZ, M.; LABAÑINO MULET, N. Similitudes y diferencias entre PubMed, Embase y Scopus. Revista Cubana de Información en Ciencias de la Salud, [s. l.], v. 26, n. 1, p. 84–91, 2015. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S2307-21132015000100009&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es. Acceso en: 24 feb. 2024.
CRONIN, B. Hyperauthorship: a postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, [s. l.], v. 52, n. 7, p. 558–569, 2001. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1097. Acceso en: 10 mar. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1097.abs
FALAGAS, M. E.; PITSOUNI, E. I.; MALIETZIS, G. A.; PAPPAS, G. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal, [s. l.], v. 22, n. 2, p. 338–342, feb. 2008. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF. Acceso en: 24 feb. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF
FONSECA, B. D. P. F. e; SAMPAIO, R. B.; FONSECA, M. V. de A.; ZICKER, F. Co-authorship network analysis in health research: method and potential use. Health Research Policy and Systems, [s. l.], v. 14, n. 34, p. 1-10, 2016. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0104-5. Acceso en: 16 nov. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0104-5
FONTENELLE, L. F. Authorship concentration in health sciences journals from Latin America and the Caribbean. Encontros Bibli, Florianópolis, v. 28, p. 1-13, 2023. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2023.e91456. Acceso en: 2 feb. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2023.e91456
FREEMAN, L. C. Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, Lausanne, v. 1, n. 3, p. 215–239, 1978/1979. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7. Acceso en: 6 ago. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
GARCÍA-VILLAR, C.; GARCÍA-SANTOS, J. M. Bibliometric indicators to evaluate scientific activity. Radiología (English Edition), España, v. 63, n. 3, p. 228–235, 2021. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rxeng.2021.01.002. Acceso en: 23 abr. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rxeng.2021.01.002
GOLBECK, J. Network structure and measures. In: GOLBECK, J. Analyzing the Social Web. [S. l.]: Elsevier, 2013. p. 25–44. E-book. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-405531-5.00003-1. Acceso en: 29 oct. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-405531-5.00003-1
HENRIKSEN, D. The rise in co-authorship in the social sciences (1980–2013). Scientometrics, Budapest, v. 107, n. 2, p. 455–476, may 2016. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1849-x. Acceso en: 9 mar. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1849-x
HOTTENROTT, H.; LAWSON, C. What is behind multiple institutional affiliations in academia? Science and Public Policy, [s. l.], v. 49, n. 3, p. 382–402, jun. 2022. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scab086. Acceso en: 27 mayo 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scab086
ISFANDYARI-MOGHADDAM, A.; SABERI, M. K.; TAHMASEBI-LIMONI, S.; MOHAMMADIAN, S.; NADERBEIGI, F. Global scientific collaboration: a social network analysis and data mining of the co-authorship networks. Journal of Information Science, [s. l.], v. 49, n. 4, p. 1126–1141, 2023. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515211040655. Acceso en: 16 nov. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515211040655
JACOMY, M.; VENTURINI, T.; HEYMANN, S.; BASTIAN, M. ForceAtlas2, a continuous graph layout algorithm for handy network visualization designed for the gephi software. PLoS ONE, [s. l.], v. 9, n. 6, e98679, p. 1-12, jun. 2014. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098679. Acceso en: 16 ago. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098679
JAKAB, M.; KITTL, E.; KIESSLICH, T. How many authors are (too) many? A retrospective, descriptive analysis of authorship in biomedical publications. Scientometrics, Budapest, v. 129, n. 3, p. 1299–1328, mar. 2024. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-04928-1. Acceso en: 10 mar. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-04928-1
KALHOR, G.; ASADI SARIJALOU, A.; SHARIFI SADR, N.; BAHRAK, B. A new insight to the analysis of co-authorship in Google Scholar. Applied Network Science, [s. l.], v. 7, n. 1, p. 1-17, 2022. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-022-00460-4. Acceso en: 16 mayo 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-022-00460-4
KAVIC, M. S.; SATAVA, R. M. Scientific literature and evaluation metrics: impact factor, usage metrics, and altmetrics. Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons, [s. l.], v. 25, n. 3, e2021.00010, p. 1-4, jul./sep. 2021. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2021.00010. Acceso en: 7 mar. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2021.00010
KELLY, N.; DOYLE, J.; PARKER, M. Methods for assessing higher education research team collaboration: comparing research outputs and participant perceptions across four collaborative research teams. Higher Education Research & Development, [s. l.], v. 39, n. 2, p. 215–229, 2020. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1676199. Acceso en: 3 ene. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1676199
KOKOL, P. Discrepancies among Scopus and Web of Science, coverage of funding information in medical journal articles: a follow-up study. Journal of the Medical Library Association, [s. l.], v. 111, n. 3, p. 703–708, jul. 2023. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2023.1513. Acceso en: 9 mar. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2023.1513
KUMAR, S. Co-authorship networks: a review of the literature. Aslib Journal of Information Management, [s. l.], v. 67, n. 1, p. 55–73, jan. 2015. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-09-2014-0116. Acceso en: 16 mayo 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-09-2014-0116
LANDHERR, A.; FRIEDL, B.; HEIDEMANN, J. A critical review of centrality measures in social networks. Business & Information Systems Engineering, [s. l.], v. 2, n. 6, p. 371–385, dec. 2010. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-010-0127-3. Acceso en: 17 jun. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-010-0127-3
LEÓN, C.; BAHOS-OLIVERA, A. Quién es quién en la red de coautoría en Colombia. Revista de Economía del Rosario, Bogotá, v. 24, n. 2, p. 1-39, jul./dic. 2021. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/economia/a.10471. Acceso en: 24 mayo 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/economia/a.10471
LEVALLOIS, C. Creating a network from a table of cooccurring items. Gephi, 2024. Disponible en: https://github.com/seinecle/gephi-tutorials/blob/master/src/main/asciidoc/cooccurrences-computer-en.adoc. Acceso en: 8 mar. 2024.
LIGHT, D.; KELLER, S.; CALHOUN, C. Sociología. 5. ed. Bogotá: McGraw-Hill Interamericana, 1991.
LIU, X.; BOLLEN, J.; NELSON, M. L.; VAN DE SOMPEL, H. Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community. Information Processing & Management, [s. l.], v. 41, n. 6, p. 1462–1480, dec. 2005. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2005.03.012. Acceso en: 1 mar. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2005.03.012
MAIA, L. F. M. P.; LENZI, M.; RABELLO, E. T.; OLIVEIRA, J. Scientific collaboration in Zika: identification of the leading research groups and researchers via social network analysis. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, Rio de Janeiro, v. 35, n. 3, e00220217, p. 1-21, mar. 2019. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00220217. Acceso en: 18 jun. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00220217
MEGHANATHAN, N. Graph theory for network science. Jackson, 2016. Disponible en: https://www.jsums.edu/nmeghanathan/files/2017/01/CSC641-Mod-1.pdf. Acceso en: 5 mar. 2024
MEJIA, C.; WU, M.; ZHANG, Y.; KAJIKAWA, Y. Exploring topics in bibliometric research through citation networks and semantic analysis. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, [s. l.], v. 6, p. 1-16, sep. 2021. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2021.742311. Acceso en: 23 abr. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2021.742311
MISNAZA CASTRILLÓN, S.; CRUZ RIVERA, E.; PARRA, A. I.; SALAS QUIJANO, S.; GIRALDO MAYORGA, D. C.; SANTANA RODRÍGUEZ, D.; CASTAÑEDA ORJUELA, C. Análisis de redes sociales de la red de conocimiento en salud pública del Observatorio Nacional de Salud de Colombia: un análisis de documentos. Gerencia y Políticas de Salud, Bogotá, v. 21, 2022. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.rgps21.arsr. Acceso en: 7 abr. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.rgps21.arsr
MONGEON, P.; PAUL-HUS, A. The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics, Budapest, v. 106, n. 1, p. 213–228, jan. 2016. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5. Acceso en: 7 mar. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5
MORZINSKI, J. A.; FISHER, J. C. A nationwide study of the influence of faculty development programs on colleague relationships. Academic Medicine, [s. l.], v. 77, n. 5, p. 402–406, may 2002. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200205000-00010. Acceso en: 17 jun. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200205000-00010
MURILLO ACEITUNO, C.; GAITÁN GUERRERO, J. F. A.; MOLERO ZAYAS, J. Colaboración científica en redes médicas en Colombia, influencia de aspectos culturales. Revista fisioGlía, v. 7, n. 2, p. 35–41, mayo/ago. 2020. Disponible en: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7376476. Acceso en: 2 jun. 2025.
NEWMAN, M. E. J. A measure of betweenness centrality based on random walks. Social Networks, [s. l.], v. 27, n. 1, p. 39–54, jan. 2005. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.009. Acceso en: 16 ago. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.009
NEWMAN, M. E. J. Who is the best connected scientist? A study of scientific coauthorship networks. In: BEN-NAIM, E.; FRAUENFELDER, H.; TOROCZKAI, Z. (eds.). Complex Networks. Berlin: Springer, 2004. p. 337–370. (Lecture Notes in Physics, v. 650). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-44485-5_16
OLDHAM, S.; FULCHER, B.; PARKES, L.; ARNATKEVIC̆IŪTĖ, A.; SUO, C.; FORNITO, A. Consistency and differences between centrality measures across distinct classes of networks. PLOS ONE, [s. l.], v. 14, n. 7, e0220061, p. 1-23, 26 jul. 2019. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220061. Acceso en: 17 jun. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220061
ORDÓÑEZ, E. J.; LEÓN CANO, J. F.; RODRÍGUEZ TIMANÁ, L. C.; AGÁMEZ LLANOS, V. de los Á.; CASTILLO GARCÍA, J. F.; ABADÍA, A. A. Análisis bibliométrico del campo del trabajo social: una mirada a partir de la producción científica en revistas de impacto internacional. Revista Ciencias Humanas, Cali, n. 16, p. 63–77, 2023. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.21500/01235826.6790. Acceso en: 5 jun. 2024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21500/01235826.6790
PAEZ-LOGREIRA, H.; ZAMORA-MUSA, R.; VELEZ-ZAPATA, J. Relation analysis of knowledge management, research, and innovation in university research groups. Journal of technology management & innovation, Santiago, v. 11, n. 4, p. 5–11, 2016. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242016000400002. Acceso en: 24 dic. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242016000400002
PÉREZ-SOLÀ, C.; CASAS-ROMA, J. Análisis de datos de redes sociales. Barcelona: Editorial UOC, 2016. (Collección Manuales: Tecnología, n. 430).
PONOMARIOV, B.; BOARDMAN, C. What is co-authorship? Scientometrics, Budapest, v. 109, n. 3, p. 1939–1963, dec. 2016. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2127-7. Acceso en: 29 ene. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2127-7
PRANCKUTĖ, R. Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: the titans of bibliographic information in today’s academic world. Publications, [s. l.], v. 9, n. 1, p. 1-59, 2021. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010012. Acceso en: 8 mar. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010012
R CORE TEAM. R: a language and environment for statistical computing: reference index. Version 4.3.2. [Vienna]: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, c2023. Disponible en: https://cran.r-project.org/manuals.html. Acesso en: 17 jun. 2024.
RODRÍGUEZ-GUTIÉRREZ, J. K.; GÓMEZ-VELASCO, N. Y. Redes de coautoría como herramienta de evaluación de la producción científica de los grupos de investigación. Revista General de Información y Documentación, Madrid, v. 27, n. 2, p. 279–297, dic. 2017. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.5209/RGID.58204. Acceso en: 3 ene. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/RGID.58204
ROJAS-LAMORENA, Á. J.; DEL BARRIO-GARCÍA, S.; ALCÁNTARA-PILAR, J. M. A review of three decades of academic research on brand equity: a bibliometric approach using co-word analysis and bibliographic coupling. Journal of Business Research, [s. l.], v. 139, p. 1067–1083, feb. 2022. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.025. Acceso en: 22 abr. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.025
RUEDA-CLAUSEN GÓMEZ, C. F.; VILLA-ROEL GUTÍERREZ, C.; RUEDA-CLAUSEN PINZÓN, C. E. Indicadores bibliométricos: origen, aplicación, contradicción y nuevas propuestas. MedUNAB, Bucaramanga, v. 8, n. 1, p. 29–36, mayo 2005. Disponible en: https://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/medunab/article/view/208. Acceso en: 22 abr. 2024.
SABIDUSSI, G. The centrality index of a graph. Psychometrika, [s. l.], v. 31, n. 4, p. 581–603, 1966. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289527. Acceso en: 17 jun. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289527
SIMPSON, D. E.; REDISKE, V. A.; BEECHER, A.; BOWER, D.; MEURER, L.; LAWRENCE, S.; WOLKOMIR, M. Understanding the careers of physician educators in family medicine. Academic Medicine, [s. l.], v. 76, n. 3, p. 259–265, mar. 2001. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200103000-00016. Acceso en: 17 jun. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200103000-00016
VIENNI BAPTISTA, B.; VILSMAIER, U. Models of transdisciplinary knowledge production at universities: a Romanian case study. Higher Education Research & Development, [s. l.], v. 41, n. 5, p. 1757–1772, 2022. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1910208. Acceso en: 28 feb. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1910208
WARNER, E. T.; CARAPINHA, R.; WEBER, G. M.; HILL, E. V.; REEDE, J. Y. Faculty promotion and attrition: the importance of coauthor network reach at an academic medical center. Journal of General Internal Medicine, [s. l.], v. 31, n. 1, p. 60–67, jan. 2016. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-015-3463-7. Acceso en: 17 jun. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-015-3463-7
WICKHAM, H.; FRANÇOIS, R.; HENRY, L.; MÜLLER, K.; VAUGHAN, D. Dplyr: a grammar of data manipulation. R package versión 1.1.4. [S. l.]: c2023. Disponible en: https://github.com/tidyverse/dplyr. Acceso en: 17 jun. 2024.
WICKHAM, H. Ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer, 2009. E-book. (Book series Use R!). Disponible en: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-0-387-98141-3. Acceso en: 17 jun. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98141-3
WU, Y.; DUAN, Z. Social network analysis of international scientific collaboration on psychiatry research. International Journal of Mental Health Systems, [s. l.], v. 9, n. 2, p. 1-10, jan. 2015. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-4458-9-2. Acceso en: 30 mar. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-4458-9-2
WUCHTY, S.; JONES, B. F.; UZZI, B. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, [s. l.], v. 316, n. 5827, p. 1036–1039, 18 may 2007. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099. Acceso en: 9 mar. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099
YAN, E.; DING, Y. Applying centrality measures to impact analysis: a coauthorship network analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, [s. l.], v. 60, n. 10, p. 2107–2118, oct. 2009. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21128. Acceso en: 9 jul. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21128
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Adolfo A. Abadía, Julio César Alonso-Cifuentes

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author must guarantee that:
- there is full consensus among all the coauthors in approving the final version of the document and its submission for publication.
- the work is original, and when the work and/or words from other people were used, they were properly acknowledged.
Plagiarism in all of its forms constitutes an unethical publication behavior and is unacceptable. Encontros Bibli has the right to use software or any other method of plagiarism detection.
All manuscripts submitted to Encontros Bibli go through plagiarism and self-plagiarism identification. Plagiarism identified during the evaluation process will result in the filing of the submission. In case plagiarism is identified in a manuscript published in the journal, the Editor-in-Chief will conduct a preliminary investigation and, if necessary, will make a retraction.
This journal, following the recommendations of the Open Source movement, provides full open access to its content. By doing this, the authors keep all of their rights allowing Encontros Bibli to publish and make its articles available to the whole community.
Encontros Bibli content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Any user has the right to:
- Share - copy, download, print or redistribute the material in any medium or format.
- Adapt - remix, transform and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
According to the following terms:
- Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything that the license permits.


















