Raising significances to signifiers: from knowledge management to knowledge organization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2004v9nesp1p1Keywords:
Knowledge management, Knowledge organization, Information scienceAbstract
This work argues that the state of conceptual ambiguity related to the terms knowledge or wisdom organization and management is reinforced by two kinds of factors: one related to the recent restructuring of the field of information science, and the other related to the evolution of the professional fields of action in this area, from the expansion of capitalistic social and working relationships, both affecting the ways of expressing ideas by using words. It is based both on experts’ studies and on contents analyses from the annals of the VI Congreso del Capítulo Español de ISKO and IV Coloquio Internacional de Ciencias de la Documentación, considering that a concept can be defined whether in relation to empirical data or to the theoretical bases that constitute it. It verifies a tendency towards the reinforcement of a theoretical and epistemological basis which improves common language so it can succeed in the comprehension of the founding concepts in the field of information science. It considers that representing knowledge, whether recorded or not, as a way to raise or attribute significances to the signifiers, is a product of contradictory commitments under the double pressure of ideological factors and technological imperatives, related to the effective development of the knowledge management system, its propositions and duties.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2004 Leilah Santiago Bufrem
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author must guarantee that:
- there is full consensus among all the coauthors in approving the final version of the document and its submission for publication.
- the work is original, and when the work and/or words from other people were used, they were properly acknowledged.
Plagiarism in all of its forms constitutes an unethical publication behavior and is unacceptable. Encontros Bibli has the right to use software or any other method of plagiarism detection.
All manuscripts submitted to Encontros Bibli go through plagiarism and self-plagiarism identification. Plagiarism identified during the evaluation process will result in the filing of the submission. In case plagiarism is identified in a manuscript published in the journal, the Editor-in-Chief will conduct a preliminary investigation and, if necessary, will make a retraction.
This journal, following the recommendations of the Open Source movement, provides full open access to its content. By doing this, the authors keep all of their rights allowing Encontros Bibli to publish and make its articles available to the whole community.
Encontros Bibli content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Any user has the right to:
- Share - copy, download, print or redistribute the material in any medium or format.
- Adapt - remix, transform and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
According to the following terms:
- Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything that the license permits.