Organización reticular de la memoria semántica. Natural Finder y Definition Finder, dos métodos informatizados para recuperar conocimiento
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2014v19n40p235Abstract
Dos líneas de teorías estudian la organización del conocimiento conceptual: las holísticas y las de rasgos. El objetivo de este trabajo es presentar dos métodos informatizados de captura y análisis de redes semánticas, el Natural Finder y el Definition Finder, que responden a estos modelos respectivamente. El primero es un procedimiento recursivo para capturar a partir de un concepto disparador la red semántica natural de una persona en torno a dicho concepto; el segundo permite obtener el conjunto de atributos ponderados que mejor definen a un concepto para un colectivo social. Se presentan ejemplos de su aplicación.
Downloads
References
BECK, K. Test Driven Development. 1ra. Ed., pp 240, Editorial Addison Wesley Professional. 2003.
BORGATTI, S. NetDraw. Natick: Analytic Technologies. V 0.60. 2002.
COLLINS, A. M.; LOFTUS, E. F. A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review. 1975, vol. 82, p. 407–428.
CREE, G. S. y MCRAE, K. Analyzing the factors underlying the structure and computation of the meaning of chipmunk, cherry, chisel, cheese, and cello (and many other such concrete nouns). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2003, vol. 132, 163-201.
DE ALMEIDA, R.G. What Do Category-Specific Semantic Deficits Tell Us about the Representation of Lexical Concepts? Brain and Language. 1999, 68, 241-248.
DAMASIO, H., TRANEL, D., GRABOWSKI, T., ADOLPHS, R., DAMASIO, A. Neural systems behind word and concept retrieval. Cognition, 2004, 92, 179-229. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2002.07.001
DEVLIN, J.T., GONNERMAN, L.M., ANDERSEN, E.S., SEIDENBERG, M.S. Category specific semantic deficits in focal and widespread brain damage: A computational account. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 1998, vol. 10, p. 77-94.
GARCIA , PAGNOTTA, L., PAZGON, E., VIVAS, J. Poder de discriminación de los atributos semánticos. Mínima cantidad de descriptores requeridos para identificar conceptos emocionales. En V. Jaichenco y Y. Sevilla (Coords.), Psicolingüística en español. Homenaje a Juan Seguí. Bs. As.: Editorial FFyL UBA., 2013, p. 95-109.
GOLDBERG, A., ROBSON D. Smalltalk-80 The Language. 1ra. Ed., pp 608, Editorial Addison Wesley Publishing Co. 1989.
JOHNSON, S. C. Hierarchical Clustering Schemes. Psychometrika. 1967, vol. 2, p. 241-254.
KAHNEMAN, D.; TVERSKY, A. On the psychology of prediction. Psychology Review. 1973, vol. 80, p. 237-251.
LAMAS, V. “Representación semántica del implante dentario, Ansiedad y Percepción Psicológica del dolor postoperatorio en pacientes sometidos a cirugía de implante oral”. Director: Dr. Jorge Vivas. Trabajo para obtener el grado de Lic. en Psicología, Facultad de Psicología. UNMDP, 2014.
MCNAMARA, T. P.; HOLBROOK, J. B. Semantic Memory and Priming. En: A. F. HEALY; R. W. PROCTOR (Eds.) Handbook of Psychology Volume 4 Experimental Psychology. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2003, p. 447-474.
MOSS, H.E.; TYLER, L.K.; TAYLOR, K.I. Conceptual structure. En: G. GASKELL (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2007, p. 217-234.
SARTORI, G., LOMBARDI, L. Semantic relevance and semantic disorders. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2004, 16, 439-452. Doi: 10.1162/089892904322926773
SMITH, E.E., MEDIN, D.L. Categories and concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981.
SPROULL B. Alan Kay a visionary designer, Points of View: a tribute to Alan Kay. 1ra Ed., Editorial Typecraft Wood & Jones Inc., pp 1-4, Pasadena, California, USA. 2010.
VIGLIOCCO, G., VINSON, D.P. Semantic representations. En: G. Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of psycholinguistics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2007. p. 195-215.
VIVAS, L., MACINTYRE, M., VIVAS, J. Y RICCI, L. Variables psicolingüísticas involucradas en la evocación de conceptos a partir de la presentación de atributos sucesivos. Manuscrito no publicado.
VIVAS, J., COMESAÑA, A., GARCÍA CONI, A., VIVAS, L., YERRO, M. Distribución de los atributos semánticos en función del tipo de categoría y campo semántico. Resultados preliminares para la confección de normas de atributos. En: M.C. Richaud y V. Lemos (comp.) Psicología y otras ciencias del comportamiento. Compendio de investigaciones actuales. Tomo 1. Libertador San Martin: Editorial Universidad Adventista del Plata, 2011, p.311-333.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The author must guarantee that:
- there is full consensus among all the coauthors in approving the final version of the document and its submission for publication.
- the work is original, and when the work and/or words from other people were used, they were properly acknowledged.
Plagiarism in all of its forms constitutes an unethical publication behavior and is unacceptable. Encontros Bibli has the right to use software or any other method of plagiarism detection.
All manuscripts submitted to Encontros Bibli go through plagiarism and self-plagiarism identification. Plagiarism identified during the evaluation process will result in the filing of the submission. In case plagiarism is identified in a manuscript published in the journal, the Editor-in-Chief will conduct a preliminary investigation and, if necessary, will make a retraction.
This journal, following the recommendations of the Open Source movement, provides full open access to its content. By doing this, the authors keep all of their rights allowing Encontros Bibli to publish and make its articles available to the whole community.
Encontros Bibli content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Any user has the right to:
- Share - copy, download, print or redistribute the material in any medium or format.
- Adapt - remix, transform and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
According to the following terms:
- Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything that the license permits.