Proposals KOS typologies: an analysis of the references of dominant forms of knowledge organization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2015v20nesp1p89Keywords:
Typologies of KOS, ISO 25944, Logical parameters of organization, Knowledge organizationAbstract
Discusses the parameters of knowledge organization used in KO’s studies taking as object of observation types of KOS. Identifies in the typlogies’s construction, the predominance of opposition figure as a resource used to establish the disjunctions between systems, showing that the variation depends on the starting point adopted for its organization. Highlights aspects privileged in its construction, which generally comprise semantic degrees of force, the use by humans or machines, covered dimensions, references to conceptual backgrounds, more or less relationship with the natural language representation among others. Analyzes the organization principles of ISO 25964 highlighting the mapping capabilities that, in addition to its primary purpose, allows the identification of the parameters of organization. Concludes by observing that prevail in typologies and in the recommendations of thesaurus construction the principles of classical logic standard, introducing a discussion about its implications as regards the complexity of the contemporary world.
Downloads
References
BOWKER, Geoffrey C. & STAR, Susan Leigh. Sorting things out: classification and its consequences. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1999.
FUJITA, Mariângela Spotti Lopes. Organização e representação do conhecimento no Brasil: análise de aspectos conceituais e da produção científica do enancib no período de 2005 a 2007. Tendências da Pesquisa Brasileira em Ciência da Informação, v. 1, n.1, 2008. Disponível em: <http://inseer.ibict.br/ancib/index.php/tpbci/article/view/4/13> Acesso em fev. 2014.
GARCÍA CANCLINI, Néstor. Diferentes, desiguais e desconectados: apas da interculturalidade. 2.ed. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. UFRJ, 2007.
GARCÍA GUTIÉRREZ, Antonio. Outra memória é possível: estratégias descolonizadoras do arquivo mundial. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2008.
GARDIN, Jean-Claude. Éléments d'un modèle pour la description des lexiques documentaires. Bulletin des Bibliothèques de France, v.11, n.5, p.171-182, 1966. Disponível em: <http://bbf.enssib.fr/consulter/bbf-1966-05-0171-001> Acesso em jan. 2014.
GUIMARÃES, José Augusto Chaves & PINHO, Fabio Assis. Aspectos éticos em organização e representação do conhecimento (O.R.C.). In: ANAIS. VII ENANCIB - Encontro Nacional de Pesquisa em Ciência da Informação, Marília, 2006.
HJORLAND, Bierger. Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS). In: HJORLAND, B. Lifeboat of Knowledge Organization. 2008. Disponível em: <http://www.iva.dk/bh/lifeboat_ko/CONCEPTS/knowledge_organization_systems.htm> Acesso em jul. 2012.
HODGE, Gail. Systems of knowledge organization for digital libraries: beyond traditional autority files. Washington, D.C.: The Digital Library Federation Council on Library Information Resources, 2000. Disponível em: <http://old.diglib.org/pubs/dlf090/dlf090.pdf> Acesso em dez. 2013.
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ORGANIZATION. ISO 25964: thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies. Part 1: Thesauri for information retrieval. Geneve: International Standard Organization, 2011.
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ORGANIZATION. ISO 25964: thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies. Part 2: Interoperability with other vocabularies. Geneve: International Standard Organization, 2012.
LARA, Marilda Lopes Ginez de. Novas tecnologias nos sistemas de organização do conhecimento: possibilidades de 'escutar' outros discursos? Anais da 2a. Jornada Científica Internacional Redes e Processos Info-Comunicacionais: mediações, memórias, apropriações, 2012. Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz, 2013. v. 1. p. 152-166.
LÓPEZ HUERTAS, Maria José. Reflexions on muldimensional knowledge: its influence on the foundation of knowledge organization. Knowledge Organization, v.40, n.6, p.400-407.
MARTELETO, Regina Maria & LARA, Marilda Lopes Ginez. Os Grupos de Trabalho – GTs da ANCIB e a promoção da pesquisa em Ciência da Informação. In: Fujita, M.S.L.; Marteleto, R.M. & Lara, M.L.G. (org.). Dimensão epistemológica da Ciência da Informaçao e suas interfaces técnicas, políticas e institucionais nos processos de produção, acesso e disseminação da informação. São Paulo: Cultura Acadêmica Ed.; Marília: Fundepe Editora, 2008. p.3-15.
MAZZOCCHI, Fulvio. Images of thought and their relation to classification: the tree and the net. Knowledge Organization, v.40, n.6, p.366-375.
MOREIRO GONZÁLEZ, José Antonio Linguagens documentárias e vocabulários semânticos para a web: elementos conceituais. Salvador; EDUFBA, 2011. 128p.
SANTOS, Boaventura de Sousa. Um discurso sobre as ciências na transição para uma ciência pós-moderna. Estudos avançados, São Paulo, v.2, n.3, maio/ago. 1988.
SOARES, Maria Sueny Barbosa; MARTIN, Mariana Thamires: FRANCELIN, Marivalde Moacir. Pluralismo lógico e epistemologia interativa como ferramentas desclassificatórias do conhecimento. Rev. Digital de Bibl. E Ciência da Informação, v.11, n.1, p.55-71, jan./abr. 2013.
SOERGEL, Dagobert. The representation of Knowledge Organization Structure (KOS) data. a multiplicity of standards. Roanoke: JCDL, 2001. Disponível em: <http://www.dsoergel.com/cv/B75.pdf > Acesso em fev. 2014.
TREDINNICK, Luke. Each one of us was several: networks, rhizomes and web organisms. Knowledge Organization, v.40, n.6, p.415-421.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Marilda Lopes Ginez de Lara
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author must guarantee that:
- there is full consensus among all the coauthors in approving the final version of the document and its submission for publication.
- the work is original, and when the work and/or words from other people were used, they were properly acknowledged.
Plagiarism in all of its forms constitutes an unethical publication behavior and is unacceptable. Encontros Bibli has the right to use software or any other method of plagiarism detection.
All manuscripts submitted to Encontros Bibli go through plagiarism and self-plagiarism identification. Plagiarism identified during the evaluation process will result in the filing of the submission. In case plagiarism is identified in a manuscript published in the journal, the Editor-in-Chief will conduct a preliminary investigation and, if necessary, will make a retraction.
This journal, following the recommendations of the Open Source movement, provides full open access to its content. By doing this, the authors keep all of their rights allowing Encontros Bibli to publish and make its articles available to the whole community.
Encontros Bibli content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Any user has the right to:
- Share - copy, download, print or redistribute the material in any medium or format.
- Adapt - remix, transform and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
According to the following terms:
- Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything that the license permits.