Privacy, ethics and information: a philosophical reflection on the informational ethics dilemmas in the context of social networks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2017v22n50p91Keywords:
Privacy, Information ethics, Social networks, Information Philosophy, Digital cultureAbstract
This article aims to reflect on the dilemmas of the right to privacy in the context of social networks regarding the experience of democracy in cyberspace, by problematizing the effectiveness of guaranteeing the protection of the privacy of Internet users, in the appreciation of the principles of freedom and autonomy in the Internet environment. It indicates the various national and international legislation that guarantee the citizens' right to privacy and protection of personal data. It reviews the literature of informational ethics, associating this domain of knowledge with the concept of privacy and the context of social networks, discussing the construction of concepts that guide and are directly involved with the domains of informational ethics. Critically considers that the customization of content operated by digital companies, in exchange for the broad freedom of access to the personal data of its users, threatens the principles of autonomy and freedom in cyberspace. It notices that the investigation of personal data is also done among individuals themselves, as a reflection of the current culture of "transparency". Highlights of the need for ethical and legal protection of the digital data of Internet users, aiming at the autonomous safeguarding of their digital identity.
Downloads
References
BRASIL. Constituição (1988). Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988. Brasília, DF: Senado Federal: Centro Gráfico, 1988. 292 p.
______. Lei nº 12.527, de 18 de novembro de 2011. Regula o acesso a informações previsto no inciso XXXIII do art. 5o, no inciso II do § 3o do art. 37 e no § 2o do art. 216 da Constituição Federal. Diário Oficial da União. Poder Executivo, Brasília, DF, 18 nov. 2011. Seção 1, p. 12.
CAPURRO, Rafael. Ética intercultural de la información. In: GOMES, Henriette Ferreira; BOTTENTUIT, Aldinar Martins; OLIVEIRA, Maria Odaisa Espinheiro de. (Org.). A ética na sociedade, na área da informação e da atuação profissional: o olhar da Filosofia, da Sociologia, da Ciência da Informação e da formação e do exercício profissional do bibliotecário no Brasil. Brasília, DF: Conselho Federal de Biblioteconomia, 2009. p. 43-64. Disponível em: <http://www.cfb.org.br/popup/a_etica.pdf>. Disponível em: 25 jun. 2016.
______. Impactos de las tecnologías digitales de la información y comunicación en la filosofía, las artes y las ciencias. Perspectivas UNICAMP 50 anos. Mesa: Impactos das Tecnologias da Informação na Filosofia, nas Artes e na Ciência. Anais eletrônicos... Campinas: UNICAMP, 2016. Disponível em: <http://www.capurro.de/campinas.html>. Acesso em: 22 set. 2016.
______. Privacy: An Intercultural Perspective. Ethics and Information Technology, v. 7, 2005, p. 37-47. Disponível em: <http://www.capurro.de/privacy.html>. Acesso em: 24 jun. 2016.
CAPURRO, Rafael; ELDRED, Michael; NAGEL, Daniel. It and privacy from an ethical perspective digital whoness: identity, privacy and freedom in the cyberworld. In:
BUCHMANN, Johannes (Ed.). Internet Privacy: a multidisciplinary analysis.
München: Acatech, 2012. Disponível em: <http://www.acatech.de/fileadmin/user_ upload/ aumstruktur_nach_Website/Acatech/ root/de/Publikationen/Projektberichte/ acatech_STUDIE_Internet_Privacy_WEB.pdf>. Acesso em: 11 out. 2016.
CONVENTION for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. European Convention on Human Rights. European Court of Human Rights. Council of Europe. Rome, 04 nov. 1950. Disponível em: <http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/ Convention_ENG.pdf>. Acesso em: 23 jun. 2016.
FEATHER, John; STURGES, Paul (Ed.). International Encyclopedia of Information and Library Science. 2. ed. London: Routledge, 2003.
FERREIRA, Rubens da Silva. A sociedade de vigilância como sociedade de disciplina, vigilância e controle. Información, cultura y sociedad, Buenos Aires, n.
, dez. 2014. Disponível em: <http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_ arttext&pid=S185117402014000200007>. Acesso em: 29 ago. 2016.
FLORIDI, Luciano. Information ethics: On the philosophical foundation of computer ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, v. 1, n. 1, p. 33-52, mar. 1999.
FOUCAULT, Michel. Vigiar e punir: história da violência nas prisões. 41. ed. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2013.
FREIRE, Gustavo Henrique de Araújo. Sobre a ética da informação. In: SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO DE ÉTICA DA INFORMAÇÃO, 1., 2010, João Pessoa. Ética da informação: conceitos, abordagens, aplicações. Organização de Gustavo Henrique de Araújo Freire. João Pessoa: Ideia, 2010. p. 5-10. Disponível em:
<http://ru.ffyl.unam.mx:8080/bitstream/10391/1328/1/teaching%20information%20eth ics.pdf>. Acesso em: 26 jun. 2016.
GONZÁLEZ DE GOMEZ, Maria Nélida. Desafios contemporâneos da ciência da informação: as questões éticas da informação. In: ENCONTRO NACIONAL DE PESQUISA DA ASSOCIAÇÃO NACIONAL DE PESQUISA E PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM CIÊNCIA DA INFORMAÇÃO, 10., 2009, João Pessoa. Responsabilidade social da Ciência da Informação [trabalhos apresentados]. Organização de Gustavo Henrique de Araújo Freire. João Pessoa: UFPB, 2009. p. 106-126.
Disponível em: <http://enancib.ibict.br/index.php/enancib/xenancib/paper/viewFile /3133/2259>. Acesso em: 29 jun. 2016.
INTERNATIONAL Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. United Nations. Human Rights. 16 dec. 1966. Disponível em: <http://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest /pages /ccpr.aspx>. Acesso em: 23 jun. 2016.
PARISER, Eli. O filtro invisível: o que a internet está escondendo de você. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 2012.
UNITED NATIONS. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Paris. 10 dec. 1948. Disponível em: <http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/>. Acesso em: 07 jul. 2016.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Grace Quaresma Fugazza; Gustavo Silva Saldanha
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author must guarantee that:
- there is full consensus among all the coauthors in approving the final version of the document and its submission for publication.
- the work is original, and when the work and/or words from other people were used, they were properly acknowledged.
Plagiarism in all of its forms constitutes an unethical publication behavior and is unacceptable. Encontros Bibli has the right to use software or any other method of plagiarism detection.
All manuscripts submitted to Encontros Bibli go through plagiarism and self-plagiarism identification. Plagiarism identified during the evaluation process will result in the filing of the submission. In case plagiarism is identified in a manuscript published in the journal, the Editor-in-Chief will conduct a preliminary investigation and, if necessary, will make a retraction.
This journal, following the recommendations of the Open Source movement, provides full open access to its content. By doing this, the authors keep all of their rights allowing Encontros Bibli to publish and make its articles available to the whole community.
Encontros Bibli content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Any user has the right to:
- Share - copy, download, print or redistribute the material in any medium or format.
- Adapt - remix, transform and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
According to the following terms:
- Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything that the license permits.