Brazilian scientific production in Chemistry between 2004 and 2013: analysis of articles indexed in the Web of Science
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2018v23n53p25Keywords:
Scientific Production, Bibliometric Indicators, ChemistryAbstract
The paper analyzes the Brazilian scientific production in Chemistry published between 2004 and 2013 as scientific articles. The corpus of the study is composed of 42,954 scientific articles selected in the Web of Science database. The results show that Brazilian scientific production in chemistry increased linearly during the ten years studied, with a growth rate of 6.29% per year and 73.19% in the whole period. Its contribution to total domestic production is 15.5% and to world production in Chemistry is 1.95%. There is great inequality among Brazilian regions in relation to their productivity. The Southeast and South regions stand out for the number of published articles. Most of the articles have national co-authors, but a percentage of 24% was co-authored with foreign researchers. Bilateral co- authorship is prevalent among articles published in international collaboration. The results point to the steady growth of the area and for to the internationalization of Brazilian chemical research.
Downloads
References
ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE INDÚSTRIA QUÍMICA. O Desempenho da indústria química brasileira em 2014. São Paulo: ABIQUIM, 2015.
BRASIL. Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovações e Comunicações. Indicadores Nacionais de Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação. Brasília, DF: MCTIC, 2017. Disponível em:<http://www.mctic.gov.br/mctic/export/sites/institucional/indicadores/arquivos/Indicadores-2017.pdf>. Acesso em: 19 jun. 2018.
CONTINI, Elisio; SÉCHET, Patrick. Ainda há um longo caminho para a ciência e tecnologia no Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Pós-Graduação, v. 2, n. 3, p. 30-39, mar. 2005. Disponível em: <http://ojs.rbpg.capes.gov.br/index.php/rbpg/article/view/57>. Acesso em: 19 jun. 2018.
FAPESP. Análise da produção científica a partir de publicações em periódicos especializados. In: ____. Indicadores de ciência e tecnologia e inovação em São Paulo. São Paulo: FAPESP, 2011. V. 1, cap. 4, p. 1-72.
GLANZEL, Wolfgang et al. Science in Brazil. Part 1: a macro-level comparative study. Scientometrics, v. 67, n. 1, p. 67-86, 2006. Disponível em: <http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11192-006-0055-7>. Acesso em: 19 jun. 2018.
GLANZEL, Wolfgang; SCHUBERT, András. A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposes. Scientometrics, v. 56, n. 3, p. 357-367, 2003. Disponível em: <http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023%2FA%3A1022378804087>. Acesso em: 19 jun. 2018.
LETA, Jacqueline. Indicadores de desempenho, ciência brasileira e a cobertura das bases informacionais. Revista USP, n. 89, p. 62-77, mar./maio 2011. Disponível em: <http://rusp.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-99892011000200005&lng=pt&nrm=iso>. Acesso em: 04 jun. 2018.
LETA, Jacqueline. Brazilian growth in the mainstream science: the role of human resources and national journals. Journal Scientometrics Research, v. 1, n. 1, p. 44-52, Sept./Dec. 2012. Disponível em: <https://www.jscires.org/sites/default/files/JSciRes_2012_1_1_44_111101.pdf >. Acesso em: 01 jun. 2017.
LETA, Jacqueline; De Meis, L. A profile of science in Brazil. Scientometrics, v. 35, n. 1, p. 33-44, 1996. Disponível em: <http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF02018231>. Acesso em: 04 jun. 2018.
LETA, Jacqueline et al. A macro-level study of science in Brazil: seven years later. Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação, v. 18, n. 36, p. 51-66, jan./abr. 2013. Disponível em: <https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/1518-2924.2013v18n36p51/26596>. Acesso em: 04 jun. 2018.
LETA, Jacqueline et al. Science in Brazil. Part 2: sectoral and institutional research profiles. Scientometrics, v. 67, n. 1, p. 87-105, 2006. Disponível em: <http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11192-006-0051-y>. Acesso em: 19 jun. 2018.
MOED, Henk F. Citation analysis in research evaluation. Amsterdam: Springer, 2005.
MUELLER, Suzana Pinheiro Machado. Métricas para a ciência e tecnologia e o financiamento da pesquisa: algumas reflexões. Encontros Bibli: Revista Eletrônica de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação, Florianópolis, ed. esp., p. 116-128, 2008. Disponível em: <https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/1518-2924.2008v13nesp1p24/1593>. Acesso em: 19 jun. 2018.
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION. Science and engineering indicators 2018. Alexandria, VA: NSF, 2018. Disponível em: <https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/assets/nsb20181.pdf>. Acesso em: 27 jun. 2018.
NORONHA, Daisy Pires; MARICATO, João de Melo. Estudos métricos da informação: primeiras aproximações. Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação, ed. esp., p. 116-128, 2008. Disponível em: <https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/1518-2924.2008v13nesp1p116>. Acesso em: 19 jun. 2018.
SCImago. Journal & Country Rank. [S.l.: SCImago, 2015]. Disponível em: <http://www.scimagojr.com/index.php>. Acesso em: 05 abr. 2015.
SIDONE, Otávio José Guerci et al. A ciência nas regiões brasileiras: evolução da produção e das redes de colaboração científica. Transinformação, v. 28, n. 1, p. 15-31, jan./abr. 2016. Disponível em: <http://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/seer/index.php/transinfo/article/view/2415/2225>. Acesso em: 19 jun. 2018.
TESTA, James. The globalization of Web of Science: 2005-2010. [Philadelphia, PA]: Thompson Reuters, 2011. Disponível em: <http://wokinfo.com/essays/globalization-of-web-of-science/>. Acesso em: 14 nov. 2015.
VANZ, Samile Andrea de Souza. As redes de colaboração científica no Brasil. 2009. 204 f. Tese (Doutorado)- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Comunicação e Informação, Faculdade de Biblioteconomia e Comunicação, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2009.
VARGAS, Rosely A. et al. The role of national journals on the rise in brazilian agricultural science publications in Web of Science. Journal of Scientometric Research, v. 3, n. 1, p. 28-36, Jan./Apr. 2014. Disponível em: <https://www.jscires.org/sites/default/files/JSciRes_2014_3_1_28_143698.pdf >. Acesso em: 19 jun. 2018.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Sabrina Diehl Menezes, Sonia Elisa Caregnato

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author must guarantee that:
- there is full consensus among all the coauthors in approving the final version of the document and its submission for publication.
- the work is original, and when the work and/or words from other people were used, they were properly acknowledged.
Plagiarism in all of its forms constitutes an unethical publication behavior and is unacceptable. Encontros Bibli has the right to use software or any other method of plagiarism detection.
All manuscripts submitted to Encontros Bibli go through plagiarism and self-plagiarism identification. Plagiarism identified during the evaluation process will result in the filing of the submission. In case plagiarism is identified in a manuscript published in the journal, the Editor-in-Chief will conduct a preliminary investigation and, if necessary, will make a retraction.
This journal, following the recommendations of the Open Source movement, provides full open access to its content. By doing this, the authors keep all of their rights allowing Encontros Bibli to publish and make its articles available to the whole community.
Encontros Bibli content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Any user has the right to:
- Share - copy, download, print or redistribute the material in any medium or format.
- Adapt - remix, transform and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
According to the following terms:
- Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything that the license permits.