Research Data Repositories in Spain: short review

Authors

  • Fernanda Passini Moreno Universidade de Brasília, UnB

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2018v23n53p52

Keywords:

Open Science, Metadata, Registry of Research Data Repositories

Abstract

This present research investigated the research data characteristics in the Spanish scenario. Exclusively Spanish repositories, registered at re3data.org were selected aiming at identifying the use of information/infrastructure systems, related data and metadata typology, as well as the most typical areas for data availability. It is a descriptive and qualitative research. After setting up the sample, aspects regarding the distribution of areas of knowledge, software used, metadata standards and kinds of content were analyzed. The selected sample shows important elements to foster discussions with the literature: a bigger Humanities and Social Science areas incidence; the use of DSpace as the software and Dublin Core as the metadata patter. Final discussions and recommendations for further studies include, among other aspects, subsequent verification of content type actually present in the directory registered and the relation between knowledge area, content type and metadata standards.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Fernanda Passini Moreno, Universidade de Brasília, UnB

Possui graduação em Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação pela Universidade Federal de São Carlos (2003). Possui mestrado (2006) e doutorado (2011) em Ciência da Informação pela Universidade de Brasília e é Professora Adjunta (DE) na mesma Universidade. É membro do Grupo dos Grupos de Pesquisa "Representação e Organização da Informação e do Conhecimento? (EROIC) e "Publicações Eletrônicas" cadastrados no Diretório do CNPq e certificado pela Instituição. Foi vice-coordenadora do GT2 Organização e Representação do Conhecimento da ANCIB (2013-2014). Atuou como professora assistente efetiva na Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG), com carga horária de 20 hs. Atuou como Consultora do Instituto Brasileiro de Informação em Ciência e Tecnologia, desenvolvendo material didático e ministrando cursos sobre o Sistema de Editoração Eletrônico de Revistas (SEER) e, posteriormente, como bolsista PCI no projeto "Monitoramento e prospecção de ferramentas que promovam o acesso livre da informação em ciência e tecnologia nacional". Ministrou mini-cursos na área de Representação Descritiva sobre os Requisitos Funcionais para Registros Bibliográficos (FRBR). Tem experiência na área de Ciência da Informação, com ênfase em Representação Descritiva e Comunicação Científica.

References

AMORIM, R.C. et al. A comparison of research data management platforms: architecture, flexible metadata and interoperability. Univ Access Inf Soc, vol. 1, n.12, 2016. Disponível em: Acesso em: 08 mar 2017. doi:10.1007/s10209-016-0475-y

BHATTACHARYA, S. G. P. K. Insight into issue of Permanent Accesse to the Records of Science in Europe (PARSE.Insight). International Conference on Digital Libraries (ICDL) 2013: Vision 2020:Looking back 10 years and forging new frontiers, vol. 1. New Delhi: TERI, 2013.

BHATTACHERJEE, A. Social science research: principles, methods, and practices. Florida: USF, 2012.

BORGMAN, C. L. The conundrum of sharing research data. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, New York, v. 63, n. 6, p. 1059-1078, Jun. 2012. Disponível em: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.22634/full . Acesso em: 15 jul. 2016.

BUDAPEST Open Access Initiative (2002). Disponível em: http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read Acesso em: 10 de maio de 2016.

DEUTSCHE FORSCHUNGSGEMEINSCHAFT. DFG Classification of Scientific Disciplines, Research Areas, Review Boards and Subject Areas (2016-2019). Disponível em: http://www.dfg.de/download/pdf/dfg_im_profil/gremien/fachkollegien/amtsperiode_2016_2019/fachsystematik_2016-2019_en_grafik.pdf. Acesso em: 03 mar. 2017.

eIRG eINFRASTRUCTURE REFLECTION GROUP. Best Practices for the use of e-Infrastructures by large-scale research infrastructures. (2015). Disponível em: http://e-irg.eu. Acesso em: 20 de jun de 2016.

FECHER, B.; FRIESIKE, S.Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thought. Berlim: German Data Forum (RatSWD), 2013. Disponível em: www.ratswd.de/dl/RatSWD_WP_218.pdf . Acesso em: 20 de maio de 2015.

FLATHERS, E.; KENYON, J., GESSLER, P. E. A service-based framework for the OAIS model for earth science data management. Earth Sci Inform, 2017, p. 1–11. Disponível em: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12145-017-0297-3 doi 10.1007/s12145-017-0297-3

FOSTER. Facilitate Open Science Training for European Research (2016). Disponível em: https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/ . Acesso em: 20 de maio de 2016.

GÓMEZ, N.; MÉNDEZ, E.; HERNÁNDEZ-PÉREZ, T. Social Sciences and Humanities research data and metadata: a perspective from thematic data repositories. El profesional de la información, v. 25, n. 4, pp. 545-555, 2016. Disponpivel em: http://dx.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2016.jul.04. Acesso em: 30 jan 2017.

GRUPO DE TRABAJO DE “DEPÓSITO Y GESTIÓN DE DATOS EN ACCESO ABIERTO” DEL PROYECTO RECOLECTA. La conservación y reutilización de los datos científicos en España. Informe del grupo de trabajo de buenas prácticas [en línea] Madrid: Fundación Española para la Ciencia y la Tecnología, FECYT (2012) Disponível em: www.fecyt.es . Acesso em: 20 fev. 2017.

HERNÁNDEZ-PEREZ, T.; GARCÍA-MORENO, M. A. Datos abiertos y repositorios de datos: nuevo reto para los bibliotecarios. El profesional de la información, vol. 22, n.3, p. 259 – 263, 2013.

KINDLING, M. et al. The Landscape of Research Data Repositories in 2015: A re3data Analysis. D-Lib Magazine, vol. 23, n. 3/4, mar/abril 2017. Disponível em: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march17/kindling/03kindling.html#21. Acesso em: 10 mar 2017.

MURRAY-RUST, P. Open Data in Science. Serials Review, Vol. 34, n. 1, 2008.

OBSERVATORIO IUNE. Informe IUNE 2016: Actividad investigadora de la universidad española. Disponível em: http://www.informes.iune.es/Informe%20IUNE%202016.pdf . Acesso em: 20 abr 2017.

OLSON, G.M.; ZIMMERMAN, A.; BOS, N. Scientific collaboration on the Internet.Cambridge: MIT Press, 2008.

PANTON PRINCIPLES. Disponível em: <http://pantonprinciples.org/>. Acesso em: 02 maio. 2017.

PATTON, M. Q. Qualitative Evaluation. In: Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA : SAGE Publication, 2007. Disponível em: http://sk.sagepub.com/reference/socialscience/n781.xml

RODRIGUES, E. et al. RepositóriUM: implementação do DSpace em português: lições para o futuro e linhas de investigação. CONFERÊNCIA DA ASSOCIAÇÃO PORTUGUESA DE SISTEMAS DE INFORMAÇÃO, 5, Lisboa, 2004 - "CAPSI 2004 : actas da 5ª conferência" [CD-ROM]. Lisboa : APSI, 2004. Disponível em: http://repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt/handle/1822/679 . Acesso em: 26 fev. 2017.

RÜCKNAGEL, J. et. al. Metadata Schema for the Description of Research Data Repositories, v.3.0, dez 2015. Disponível em: http://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/escidoc:1397899:6/component/escidoc:1398549/re3data_schema_documentation_v3_0.pdf. Acesso em: 13 mar. 2017. doi: http://doi.org/10.2312/re3.008

SAYÃO, L. F.; SALES, L. F. Algumas considerações sobre os repositórios digitais de dados de pesquisa. Inf. Inf., Londrina, v. 21, n. 2, p. 90 – 115, maio/ago, 2016. Disponível em: http://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/article/view/27939/20122 . Acesso em: 16 maio 2017.

WILLIS, C.; GREENBERG, J.; WHITE, H. Analysis and Synthesis of Metadata Goals

for Scientific Data. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 63, n. 8, 2012, p. 1505–1520.

ZHI-FENG, Z. The Study on Distribution of Research Data Repositories Based on Resources Directory Websites. In: International Conference on Economic Management and Trade Cooperation (EMTC 2014). Disponível em: http://www.atlantis-press.com/php/download_paper.php?id=11753. Acesso em: 25 mar 2017.

Foto Real Gabinete Português de Leitura, Rio de Janeiro

Downloads

Published

2018-09-06

How to Cite

MORENO, Fernanda Passini. Research Data Repositories in Spain: short review. Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação, [S. l.], v. 23, n. 53, p. 52–63, 2018. DOI: 10.5007/1518-2924.2018v23n53p52. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/1518-2924.2018v23n53p52. Acesso em: 2 jan. 2025.

Issue

Vol. 23 No. 53 (2018): Data de publicação: 06/09/2018

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2018 Fernanda Passini Moreno

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The author must guarantee that:

  • there is full consensus among all the coauthors in approving the final version of the document and its submission for publication.
  • the work is original, and when the work and/or words from other people were used, they were properly acknowledged.

Plagiarism in all of its forms constitutes an unethical publication behavior and is unacceptable. Encontros Bibli has the right to use software or any other method of plagiarism detection.

All manuscripts submitted to Encontros Bibli go through plagiarism and self-plagiarism identification. Plagiarism identified during the evaluation process will result in the filing of the submission. In case plagiarism is identified in a manuscript published in the journal, the Editor-in-Chief will conduct a preliminary investigation and, if necessary, will make a retraction.

This journal, following the recommendations of the Open Source movement, provides full open access to its content. By doing this, the authors keep all of their rights allowing Encontros Bibli to publish and make its articles available to the whole community.

 

Encontros Bibli content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Any user has the right to:

  • Share - copy, download, print or redistribute the material in any medium or format.
  • Adapt - remix, transform and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

According to the following terms:

  • Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything that the license permits.
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC