The construction of a filing plan as part of incremental innovation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2018v23nespp16Keywords:
Knowledge Organization, Filing Plan, Archives Identification, InnovationAbstract
His work deals with the construction of the classification plan of archival documents in an entity, using the methodology of archival identification. The results of the survey of typologies produced subsidized the creation of a functional filing plan and enabled the detection of non-standardized processes, as well as some discrepancies between the production of normative documents and the actual one. The methodology is considered to have contributed to incremental innovation since it is characterized by improvements to existing products/processes.
Downloads
References
ARQUIVO NACIONAL (Brasil). Dicionário Brasileiro de Terminologia Arquivística. Rio de Janeiro: Arquivo Nacional, 2005.
ASSOCIAÇÃO DOS ARQUIVISTAS BRASILEIROS. Dicionário de Terminologia Arquivística. São Paulo, 1996.
BELLOTTO, H. Arquivos permanentes: tratamento documental. Rio de Janeiro: FGV, 2004.
CAMISÓN, C.; LÓPEZ, A. V. Non-technical innovation: Organizational memory and learning capabilities as antecedente factors with effects on sustained competitive advantages. Industrial Marketing Management, v. 40, p. 1294-1304, 2011.
CAPUANO, E. A. Fontes de Informação sobre Conceitos e Indicadores de Inovação. 2015. Disponível em: <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272415293_Fontes_de_Informacao_sobre_Conceitos_e_Indicadores_de_Inovacao>. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2017.
DAMANPOUR, F. Organizational Innovation. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management. Disponível em: <http://business.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.001.0001/acrefore97801>. Acesso em: 01 nov. 2017.
FANG, S. H. et al. Relationship learning and innovation: The role of relationship-specific memory. Industrial Marketing Management, v. 40, p. 743-753, 2011.
LEE, W. L. et al. Value creation potential of individual and organizational memory in health care services. Expert Systems with Applications, v. 38, p. 10658-10664, 2011.
LEMOS, C. Inovação na era do conhecimento. In: LASTRES, Helena; ALBAGLI, Sarita (Org.). Informação e globalização na era do conhecimento. Rio de Janeiro: Campus, 1999. p. 122-144.
OCDE. Manual de Oslo. Diretrizes para coleta e interpretação de dados sobre inovação tecnológica. FINEP: [s.l.], 2006.
RODRIGUES, A. C. Identificação arquivística como requisito metodológico do Programa de Gestão de Documentos do Governo do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (PGD-RJ): reflexões sobre a construção teórica dos procedimentos e instrumentos. In: ENCONTRO NACIONAL DE PESQUISA EM CIÊNCIA DA INFORMAÇÃO, 13., 2012, Rio de Janeiro. Anais... Rio de Janeiro, 2012. Disponível em: <http://www.eventosecongressos.com.br/metodo/enancib2012/arearestrita/pdfs/19564.pdf.> Acesso em: 27 mai. 2016.
ROUSSEAU, J-Y.; COUTURE, C. Os fundamentos da disciplina arquivística. Lisboa: Publicações Dom Quixote, 1998.
SCHELLENBERG, T. Arquivos modernos: princípios e técnicas. Rio de Janeiro: FGV, 2006.
SOUSA, R. T. B. de. A classificação como função matricial do que-fazer arquivístico. In: SANTOS, Vanderlei Batista dos (Org.). Arquivística: temas contemporâneos. 2. ed. Distrito Federal: Senac, 2008. p. 78-172.
TIRONI, L. F.; CRUZ, B. de O. Inovação incremental ou radical: há motivos para diferenciar? Uma abordagem com dados da Pintec. 2008. IPEA - Texto para discussão nº 1360. Disponível em: <http://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/bitstream/11058/1537/1/TD_1360.pdf>. Acesso em: 27 mar. 2017.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Evelin Mintegui, Bruna dos Santos Ávila, Cezar Karpinski
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author must guarantee that:
- there is full consensus among all the coauthors in approving the final version of the document and its submission for publication.
- the work is original, and when the work and/or words from other people were used, they were properly acknowledged.
Plagiarism in all of its forms constitutes an unethical publication behavior and is unacceptable. Encontros Bibli has the right to use software or any other method of plagiarism detection.
All manuscripts submitted to Encontros Bibli go through plagiarism and self-plagiarism identification. Plagiarism identified during the evaluation process will result in the filing of the submission. In case plagiarism is identified in a manuscript published in the journal, the Editor-in-Chief will conduct a preliminary investigation and, if necessary, will make a retraction.
This journal, following the recommendations of the Open Source movement, provides full open access to its content. By doing this, the authors keep all of their rights allowing Encontros Bibli to publish and make its articles available to the whole community.
Encontros Bibli content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Any user has the right to:
- Share - copy, download, print or redistribute the material in any medium or format.
- Adapt - remix, transform and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
According to the following terms:
- Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything that the license permits.
As obras deste periódico estão licenciadas com 