Archival appraisal: an analysis based on systematic literature review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2018v23nespp90Keywords:
Archival Appraisal, Appraisal Methodologies, Systematic ReviewAbstract
This paper results from a research developed on archival appraisal, which the problem of define the background and investigating the approaches used in the national panorama. The objective was to identify and demonstrate the scientific production on document appraisal in Archival Science and in its interdisciplinary relationships. As grounded in the literature of the area, the appraisal process is fundamental for an effective and efficient record and information management, aiming at both the rationalization and the formation of an organizational memory, and it is from this premise that the research proceeds. The methodological procedures adopted were do systematic review with the brazilian literature on archival appraisal and also when related to document management, listing the scientific productions, under peer review, indexed in the Base de Dados em Cie?ncia da Informac?a?o (BRAPCI) of the last 10 years (2007-2016). It presents the research results, identifying the articles that deal with the theme, categorizing the methodologies and describing its characteristics, parameters and adopted criteria. It concludes that the methodology of Schellenberg's Theory of Values, despite anachronism in contemporary studies of the area, is still predominant in the theoretical framework of research and is represented in the national legislation that involves information evaluation. It also concludes that in view of the paradigmatic, technological and administrative structuring changes of the contemporary Institutions, it is possible to identify which more recent methodologies have begun to receive prominence, as is the case of Macroappraisal and Evaluation of Information Flow.Downloads
References
BOOMS, H. Society and the Formation of a Documentary heritage: issues in the appraisal of archival sources. Archivaria, v. 24, n. 3, p. 69-107, 1987.
BRUYNE, P. de; HERMAN, J.; SCHOUTHEETE, M. de. Dinâmica da pesquisa em ciências sociais: os pólos da prática metodológica. 5. ed. Rio de Janeiro: F. Alves, 1991.
COOK, T. Macroappraisal in Theory and Practice: Origins, Characteristics, and Implementation in Canada, 1950 - 2000. Archival Science, v. 5, p. 101-161, 2005.
COOK, T. Entrevista Terry Cook. InCID: Revista de Ciência da Informação e Documentação, Ribeirão Preto, v. 3, n. 2, p. 142-156, 2012.
COUTURE, C. Archival appraisal: A status report. Archivaria, v. 59, p. 83-107, 2005.
DURANTI, L. The concept of appraisal and archival theory. The American Archivist, v. 57, n. 2, p. 328-344, 1994.
EASTWOOD, T. The Archival Fonds: from theory to practice. Ottawa: Bureau of Canadian Archivists. Planning Committee on Descriptive Standards, 1992.
JENKINSON, H. A Manual of Archive Administration. Percy Lund, Humphries & Co. Ltd: London, 1922.
JESSON, J.; MATHESON, L.; LACEY, F. M. Doing your literature review: Traditional and systematic techniques. Sage, 2011.
MENNE-HARITZ, A. Appraisal or documentation: can we appraise archives by selecting content? The American Archivist, v. 57, n. 3, p. 528-542, 1994.
NASCIMENTO, M. I. G. do; OLIVEIRA, E. B. As concepções teóricas de avaliação de documentos de arquivo na legislação brasileira. Revista Ibero-Americana de Ciência da Informação, v. 9, n. 1, p. 162-177, 2016.
ROUSSEAU, J-Y.; COUTURE, C. Os fundamentos da disciplina arquivística. Lisboa: Publicações Dom Quixote, 1998.
SAMUELS, H. Who Controls the Past? The American Archivist, v. 49, n. 1, p. 109-124, 1986.
SCHELLENBERG, T. R. Modern Archives: principles and techniques. Chicago: The Society of American Archivists, 2003.
SILVA, A. M. da et al. Arquivística: Teoria e prática de uma ciência da informação. Afrontamento, 2002.
SILVA, A. M. da; PINTO, M. M. G. de A. Um modelo sistémico e integral de gestão da informação nas organizações. In: CONGRESSO INTERNACIONAL DE GESTÃO DA TECNOLOGIA E SISTEMAS DE INFORMAÇÃO, 2., 2005, São Paulo. Anais… São Paulo, 2005.
SILVA, A. M. da; RIBEIRO, F. A avaliação em arquivística: reformulação teórico-prática de uma operação metodológica. Páginas a&b, n. 5, p. 57-113, 2000.
SILVA, A. M. da; RIBEIRO, F. Perspectivar a avaliação como operação metodológica no âmbito da ciência da informação. In: ROMERO, N. L. R. Nuevas perspectivas para la difusión y organización del conocimiento: actas del congreso. Servicio de Publicaciones, p. 246-261, 2009.
SILVA, A. M. da; ROCKEMBACH, M. Entrevista: Armando Malheiro da Silva. Em Questão, Porto Alegre, v. 23, n. 2, p. 11-33, maio/ago. 2017.
UPWARD, F. et al. Structuring the records continuum (Series of two parts) Part 1: post custodial principles and properties. Archives and manuscripts, v. 24, n. 2, p. 268-285, 1996.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Moises Rockembach
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author must guarantee that:
- there is full consensus among all the coauthors in approving the final version of the document and its submission for publication.
- the work is original, and when the work and/or words from other people were used, they were properly acknowledged.
Plagiarism in all of its forms constitutes an unethical publication behavior and is unacceptable. Encontros Bibli has the right to use software or any other method of plagiarism detection.
All manuscripts submitted to Encontros Bibli go through plagiarism and self-plagiarism identification. Plagiarism identified during the evaluation process will result in the filing of the submission. In case plagiarism is identified in a manuscript published in the journal, the Editor-in-Chief will conduct a preliminary investigation and, if necessary, will make a retraction.
This journal, following the recommendations of the Open Source movement, provides full open access to its content. By doing this, the authors keep all of their rights allowing Encontros Bibli to publish and make its articles available to the whole community.
Encontros Bibli content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Any user has the right to:
- Share - copy, download, print or redistribute the material in any medium or format.
- Adapt - remix, transform and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
According to the following terms:
- Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything that the license permits.