Brazilian scientific production about Plagiarism: characterization and range from Scopus basis.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2020.e70258Keywords:
Plagiarism, Scientific production, Bibliometry, Co-authoring, CitationsAbstract
Objective: To analyze the production and scientific scope on the theme plagiarism in the Scopus basis. Identify the most productive themes, co-authors, institutions, journals and authors. Show the scientific reach of production through the characteristics of its citing.
Methods: The research is bibliometric exploratory. It proposes to broaden the understanding of the Brazilian context about this scientific production.
Results: The results highlight that plagiarism, scientific and ethical misconduct are the most mentioned keywords. Co-authoring was conducted with Spain, the United Kingdom, the United States, France and India. The most productive institutions are represented by the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) and the University of São Paulo (USP). As for the most productive journals, the highlight is the “Revista Brasileira de Educação”. Among the most productive authors is the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), represented by Vasconcelos, S.M.R. The highlight citings come from the United States and Brazil, especially the USP and UFRJ institutions. The prominent citing journal is Dutch-based Scientometrics. Referring to the authors who made the most citations are Amancio, D.R. (USP) and Vasconcelos, S.M.R. (UFRJ).
Conclusions: The results achieved allowed us to broaden our understanding of the Brazilian productive context regarding plagiarism. Brazil is able to lead the Latin American actions on the plagiarism issue in scientific production. Therefore, the guarantees of communicated knowledge depend on an understanding of science theory and intellectual honesty in the use of research methods.
Downloads
References
ADLER-KASSNER, Linda; ANSON, Chris; HOWARD, Rebecca Moore. Framing plagiarism. In: EISNER, Caroline; VICINUS, Martha (ed.). Originality, imitation and plagiarism: teaching writing in digital age. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press, 2008. p. 231-246.
AJIFERUKE, I.; LU, K.; WOLFRAM, D. A comparison of citer and citation-based measure outcomes for multiple disciplines. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v.61, n.10, p.2086–2096, 2010. Disponível em: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.21383/abstract;jsessionid=CCDEB27E05DBE1EC41BE980DA524EAB3.f04t01. Acesso em: 12 abr. 2019.
ARAÚJO, C. A. A.; BRAGA, R. M. O.; VIEIRA, W. O. A contribuição de C. Kuhlthau para a Ciência da Informação. Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação, v.7, n.2, p.185-198, 2010. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/1963. Acesso em: 10 abr. 2019.
BERLINCK, R. G. S. The academic plagiarism and its punishments: a review. Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia, Curitiba, v. 21, n. 3, p. 365–372, maio/jun. 2011. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0102-695X2011005000099&script=sci_arttext. Acesso em: 11 mar. 2019.
BORNMANN, L.; DANIEL, H. D. What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation, v.64, n.1, p.45–80, 2008. Disponível em: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10. 1108/00220410810844150. Acesso em: 8 jun. 2019.
BRAMBILLA, S. D. S.; VANZ, S. A. S.; STUMPF, I. R. C. Mapeamento de um artigo produzido na UFRGS: razões das citações recebidas. Encontros Bibli, v.11, n.especial, p.195-208, 2006. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/1518-2924.2006v11nesp1p195/423. Acesso em: 30 mar. 2019.
BUFREM, L.; PRATES, Y. O saber científico registrado e as práticas da mensuração da informação. Ciência da Informação, v.34, n.2, p.9-25, 2005. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/ci/v34n2/28551. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2019.
BUFREM, L. S. Configurações da pesquisa em ciência da informação. Datagramazero, v.14, n.6, 2013.
CRONIN, B.; SHAW, D. Identity-creators and image-makers: Using citation analysis and thick description to put authors in their place. Scientometrics, v.54, n.31, p.31-49, 2002. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023%2FA%3A1015628320056. Acesso em: 1 abr. 2019
DINIZ, Debora; MUNHOZ, Ana Terra Mejia. Cópia e Pastiche: plágio na comunicação científica. Argumentum, v.3, n.1, p.11-28, jan./jun. 2011. Disponível em: http://www.publicacoes.ufes.br/argumentum/article/view/1430. Acesso em: 14 jun. 2019.
GARFIELD, E. Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? Scientometrics, v.1, n.4, p.359-375, 1979. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF02019306. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2019.
GEORGE, S.; COSTIGAN, A.; O’HARA, M. Placing the Library at the Heart of Plagiarism Prevention: The University of Bradford Experience. New Review of Academic Librarianship, v. 19, n. 2, p. 141–160, 2013. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13614533.2013.800756. Acesso em: 11 jun. 2019.
GILMORE J.; STRICKLAND, D.; TIMMERMAN, B; MAHER, M; FELDON, D. Weeds in the flower garden: An exploration of plagiarism in graduate students’ research proposals and its connection to enculturation, ESL, and contextual factors. International Journal for Educational Integrity, v.6, n.1, p. 13–28, 2010.Disponível em: https://www.ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/IJEI/article/view/673. Acesso em: 10 abr. 2019.
IRIBARREN MAESTRO, I. Producción científica y visibilidad de los investigadores de la Universidad Carlos III de Madrid en las bases de datos del ISI,1997-2003. 2006. Tese (Doutorado) - Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, 2006. Disponível em: http://e-archivo.uc3m.es/handle/10016/1088. Acesso em:1 jun. 2019.
KROKOSCZ, Marcelo. Autoria e Plágio: um guia para estudantes, professores, pesquisadores e editores. São Paulo: Atlas, 2012.
LITTO, Frederic M. Plágio e integridade acadêmica: um dossiê eclético. São Paulo: ABED, 2018. Disponível em: http://www.abed.org.br/arquivos/Plagio_e_Integridade_Academica_Litto.pdf. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2019.
MACIAS-CHAPULA, C.A. O papel da informetria e da cientometria e sua perspectiva nacional e internacional. Ciência da Informação, Brasília, v.27, n.2, p.134-140, maio/ago. 1998.
NOE, Aline. Pesquisadores da USP têm acesso a ferramentas antiplágio. Jornal da USP, 21 de março de 2017. Disponível em: https://jornal.usp.br/universidade/pesquisadores-da-usp-tem-acesso-a-ferramentas-anti-plagio/. Acesso em: 11 out. 2019.
PLAGIARISM. In: CAMBRIDGE DICTIONARY. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019a. Disponível em: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/pt/dicionario/ingles-portugues/plagiarism. Acesso em: 11 out. 2019.
PLAGIARISM. In: ENCYCLOPAEDIA BRITANNICA. London: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 2019b. Disponível em: https://www.britannica.com/topic/plagiarism. Acesso em: 11 out. 2019.
PLAGIARISM. In: OXFORD REFERENCE. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019c. Disponível em: https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803100329803. Acesso em: 11 out. 2019.
POLICY on plagiarism. ORI Newsletter, v. 3, n. 1, dec. 1994. Disponível em: https://ori.hhs.gov/ori-policy-plagiarism. Acesso em: 11 out. 2019.
ROIG, Miguel. Avoiding plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and other questionable writing practices: a guide to ethical writing. In: ORI The office of Research Integrity. Maryland: U.S Departament of Health and Human Services, 2015. Disponível em: https://ori.hhs.gov/avoiding-plagiarism-self-plagiarism-and-other-questionable-writing-practices-guide-ethical-writing. Acesso em: 11 out. 2019.
SALDAÑA, Paulo. Instituições apostam em software contra plágio. O Estado de S. Paulo, São Paulo, 19 maio 2014. Metrópolis, A1. Disponível em: https://www.semesp.org.br/imprensa/instituicoes-apostam-em-software-contra-plagio/. Acesso em: 11 out. 2019.
SANTOS, Antonio Raimundo dos. Caracterização da pesquisa. In: SANTOS, Antonio Raimundo dos. Metodologia científica: a construção do conhecimento. Rio de Janeiro: DP&A, 1999. p. 25-31.
SATIJA, M. P.; MARTÍNEZ-ÁVILA, Daniel. Plagiarism: an essay in terminology. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, v. 39, n. 2, p. 87-93, mar. 2019. Disponível em: https://publications.drdo.gov.in/ojs/index.php/djlit/article/view/13937/7060. Acesso em: 18 out. 2019.
SMALL, H. On the shoulders of Robert Merton: towards a normative theory of citation. Scientometrics, v.60, n.1, p.71-79, 2004.
SPINAK, E. Indicadores cienciométricos. Ciência da Informação, Brasília, v.27, n.2, p.141-148, maio/ago. 1998.
TULLEY-PITCHFORD K. Mouse click plagiarism: can technology help to fight back? PRHE Journal, v.6, n.2, p. 58-68, 2012. Disponível em: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1130472. Acesso em: 17 abr. 2019.
VANZ, S.A.S.; CAREGNATO, S. E. Estudos de citação: uma ferramenta para entender a comunicação científica. Em Questão, v.9, n.2, p.295-307, 2003. Disponível em: http://seer.ufrgs.br/EmQuestao/article/view/75. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2019.
VASCONCELOS, Sonia; LETA, Jacqueline; COSTA, Lídia; PINTO, André; SORENSON, Martha M. Discussing plagiarism in Latin American Science: Brazilian researchers begin to address an ethical issue 2009. EMBO Reports, v.10, p.677-682, 2009. Disponível em: http://embor.embopress.org/content/10/7/677. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2019.
WEBER-WULFF, Debora. Plagiarism detectors are a crutch, and a problem. Nature, v. 567, p. 435, 28 mar. 2019. Disponível em: https://www.nature.com/magazine-assets/d41586-019-00893-5/d41586-019-00893-5.pdf. Acesso em: 11 out. 2019.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Fabio Orsi Meschini, Marivalde Moacir Francelin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author must guarantee that:
- there is full consensus among all the coauthors in approving the final version of the document and its submission for publication.
- the work is original, and when the work and/or words from other people were used, they were properly acknowledged.
Plagiarism in all of its forms constitutes an unethical publication behavior and is unacceptable. Encontros Bibli has the right to use software or any other method of plagiarism detection.
All manuscripts submitted to Encontros Bibli go through plagiarism and self-plagiarism identification. Plagiarism identified during the evaluation process will result in the filing of the submission. In case plagiarism is identified in a manuscript published in the journal, the Editor-in-Chief will conduct a preliminary investigation and, if necessary, will make a retraction.
This journal, following the recommendations of the Open Source movement, provides full open access to its content. By doing this, the authors keep all of their rights allowing Encontros Bibli to publish and make its articles available to the whole community.
Encontros Bibli content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Any user has the right to:
- Share - copy, download, print or redistribute the material in any medium or format.
- Adapt - remix, transform and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
According to the following terms:
- Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything that the license permits.
As obras deste periódico estão licenciadas com 