Research and digital curation and preservation: collaborative model between CHAM – Centre for the Humanities and the Digital Development of Research Services
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2024.e94319Keywords:
Research, Digital Object Preservation, Digital Curation, Research Data, CollaborationAbstract
Objective: This article intends to describe an intra-organizational experience of strategic cooperation, reflecting on the critical success factors in the development of digital preservation and curation policies involving higher education institutions and research centers.
Methods: Two qualitative perspectives are considered in the case study: the practice turn and the perspective of the study of behavior and informational practices to study the strategy and informational interactions of the collaboration model developed between a research center with more than 200 integrated researchers (CHAM – Center for the Humanities) and the specialized Digital Development of Research Services (DDRS) team from the Faculty of Social and Human Sciences of Universidade NOVA de Lisboa. Methods such as document analysis, observation and analysis of informational practices were used.
Results: The collaboration model is analyzed in its main strategic characteristics and informational practices: active and continuous dialogue between the research community, supported by DDRS coaching activities, focused on obtaining a generalized but flexible consensus around the research, digital curation, and preservation. Its implementation results from a double Top-down strategy, guaranteeing organizational support and information governance, and Bottom-up, constituting a community-led process, developing two interrelated actions: a pilot data management test experience and the evaluation collection of research project sites with recommendations for their sustainability, interoperability, digital preservation, and curation.
Conclusions: The construction of the strategy centered on shared critical reflection perspective of joint solutions and synergies for the construction of participatory digital preservation policies.
Downloads
References
BEAGRIE, N. The JISC digital preservation focus and the digital preservation coalition. New Review of Academic Librarianship, [s. l.], v. 6, n. 1, p. 257–267, 2000. Disponível em: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13614530009516815. Acesso em: 30 abr. 2023.
BURNETTE, M.; WILLIAMS, S.; IMKER, H. From Plan to Action: Successful Data Management Plan Implementation in a Multidisciplinary Project. Journal of eScience Librarianship, [s. l.], v. 5, n. 1, p. e1101, 2016. Disponível em: https://publishing.escholarship.umassmed.edu/jeslib/article/id/409/. Acesso em: 30 abr. 2023.
CARVALHO, R. A. . Arquive-se: uma viagem pelos arquivos nacionais. Lisboa: Fundação Francisco Manuel dos Santos, 2019.
CERTEAU, M.. The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.
COX, A. M. An exploration of the practice approach and its place in information science. Journal of Information Science, [s. l.], v. 38, n. 2, p. 176–188, 2012. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551511435881. Acesso em: 30 abr. 2023.
DIGITAL PRESERVATION COALITION. Digital Preservation Handbook. 2nd. ed. [s.l: s.n.], 2015.Disponível em: https://www.dpconline.org/handbook. Acesso em: 30 abr. 2023.
DRESSEL, W. F. Research Data Management Instruction for Digital Humanities. Journal of eScience Librarianship, [s. l.], v. 6, n. 2, 2017. Disponível em: https://publishing.escholarship.umassmed.edu/jeslib/article/id/346/. Acesso em: 30 abr. 2023.
EDDY, P. L. Partnerships and collaborations in higher education. Em: ASHE higher education report. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2010. v. 38.2p. 1–15.
FREEMAN, R. E.; PHILLIPS, R.; SISODIA, R. Tensions in Stakeholder Theory. Business & Society, [s. l.], v. 59, n. 2, p. 213–231, 2020. Disponível em: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0007650318773750. Acesso em: 16 mar. 2023.
FREITAS, M. C. V. ; CORUJO, L.; SOUSA, D. S. S. . Projeto Comum de Gestão Documental nas Universidades Portuguesas: harmonização e estabilização do vocabulário. Em: 12o CONGRESSO NACIONAL DE BIBLIOTECÁRIOS, ARQUIVISTAS E DOCUMENTALISTAS: LIGAR, TRANSFORMAR, CRIAR VALOR 2015, Anais... : Associação Portuguesa de Bibliotecários, Arquivistas e Documentalistas, 2015. Disponível em: https://publicacoes.bad.pt/revistas/index.php/congressosbad/article/view/1441. Acesso em: 16 mar. 2023.
FREITAS, M. C. V. De; CORUJO, L.; SOUSA, D. S. S. De. O Projeto Comum de Gestão Documental nas Instituições de Ensino Superior Portuguesas: da produção à aprovação dos instrumentos de trabalho. Em: 1aCONFERÊNCIA INTERNACIONAL DE GESTÃO DE INFORMAÇÃO E ARQUIVOS. Albergaria-a-Velha, Portugal Disponível em: https://eventos.bad.pt/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/CIGIA_COM_03.pdf Acesso em: 30 abr. 2023.
GRÁCIO, J. C. A.; FADEL, B.; VALENTIM, M. L. P. Preservação digital nas instituições de ensino superior: aspectos organizacionais, legais e técnicos. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, [s. l.], v. 18, n. 3, p. 111–129, 2013. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/pci/article/view/22875. Acesso em: 28 abr. 2023.
GUANDALINI, C. A.; FURNIVAL, A. C. M.; ARAKAKI, A. C. S. Boas práticas científicas na elaboração de planos de gestão de dados. RDBCI: Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação, [s. l.], v. 17, p. e019034, 2019. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8655895. Acesso em: 31 jul. 2023.
GUIRLET, M.; BONGI, G.; POINT, E.; URVOY, G.; SCHNEIDER, R. Proposal for a Maturity Continuum Model for Open Research Data. International Journal of Digital Curation, [s. l.], v. 17, n. 1, p. 6, 2022. Disponível em: http://www.ijdc.net/article/view/821. Acesso em: 30 abr. 2023.
HARVEY, R. Digital Curation: A How-To-Do-It Manual. New York: Neal-Schuman, 2010.
HASSAN, N. R.; MATHIASSEN, L. Distilling a body of knowledge for information systems development: Distilling an ISD body of knowledge. Information Systems Journal, [s. l.], v. 28, n. 1, p. 175–226, 2018. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/isj.12126. Acesso em: 30 abr. 2023.
HUIZING, A.; CAVANAGH, M. Planting contemporary practice theory in the garden of information science. Information Research, [s. l.], v. 16, n. 14, p. paper 497, 2011. Disponível em: https://informationr.net/ir/16-4/paper497.html. Acesso em: 30 abr. 2023.
HUVILA, I. Use-Oriented Information and Knowledge Management: Information Production and Use Practices as an Element of the Value and Impact of Information. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, [s. l.], v. 18, n. 04, p. 1950046, 2019. Disponível em: https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219649219500461. Acesso em: 30 abr. 2023.
HUVILA, I.; ENWALD, H.; ERIKSSON-BACKA, K.; LIU, Y.-H.; HIRVONEN, N. Information behavior and practices research informing information systems design. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, [s. l.], v. 73, n. 7, p. 1043–1057, 2022. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/asi.24611. Acesso em: 30 abr. 2023.
JOHNSTON, M. P. Secondary Data Analysis: A Method of which the Time Has Come. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, [s. l.], v. 3, n. 3, p. 619–626, 2014. Disponível em: https://www.qqml-journal.net/index.php/qqml/article/view/169 Acesso em: 30 abr. 2023.
JONES, M. The digital preservation coalition. VINE, [s. l.], v. 34, n. 2, p. 84–86, 2004. Disponível em: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/03055720410531031/full/html. Acesso em: 30 abr. 2023.
JONES, S.; PRYOR, G.; WHITE, A. How to Develop Research Data Management Services - a guide for HEIsEdinburgh: Digital Curation Centre, 2013. Disponível em: https://www.dcc.ac.uk/guidance/how-guides/how-develop-rdm-services. Acesso em: 30 abr. 2023.
KVALE, L.; PHARO, N. Understanding the Data Management Plan as a Boundary Object through a Multi-stakeholder perspective. International Journal of Digital Curation, [s. l.], v. 16, n. 1, p. 16, 2021. Disponível em: http://ijdc-test.journals.ed.ac.uk/ijdc/article/view/746. Acesso em: 30 abr. 2023.
LANGRAFE, T. de F.; BARAKAT, S. R.; STOCKER, F.; BOAVENTURA, J. M. G. A stakeholder theory approach to creating value in higher education institutions. The Bottom Line, [s. l.], v. 33, n. 4, p. 297–313, 2020. Disponível em: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/BL-03-2020-0021/full/html. Acesso em: 16 mar. 2023.
MAINARDES, E. W.; ALVES, H.; RAPOSO, M. Stakeholder theory: issues to resolve. Management Decision, [s. l.], v. 49, n. 2, p. 226–252, 2011. Disponível em: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/00251741111109133/full/html. Acesso em: 16 mar. 2023.
MARI?, I. Stakeholder Analisys of Higher Education Institutions. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems, [s. l.], v. 11, n. 2, p. 217–226, 2013. Disponível em: http://indecs.eu/index.php?s=x&y=2013&p=217-226. Acesso em: 16 mar. 2023.
MUSHI, G. E.; PIENAAR, H.; van DEVENTER, M. Identifying and implementing relevant research data management services for the library at the University of Dodoma, Tanzania. Data Science Journal, [s. l.], v. 19, 2020. Disponível em: https://datascience.codata.org/articles/10.5334/dsj-2020-001. Acesso em: 30 abr. 2023.
NICOLINI, D.; MONTEIRO, P. The practice approach in organizational and management studies. Em: LANGLEY, A.; TSOUKAS, H. (Eds.). The SAGE Handbook of Process Organization Studies. London: SAGE Publications, 2017.
OCHÔA, P. Gestão da informação e os desafios arquivísticos na NOVA FCSH: da avaliação da documentação acumulada à proteção de dados. Em: 2019, Coimbra. Anais... . Em: IX SEMINÁRIO DE SABERES ARQUIVÍSTICOS. Coimbra: Universidade de Coimbra, 2019. Disponível em: http://www.ufpb.br/evento/index.php/ixsesa/ixsesa/paper/viewFile/4657/2833. Acesso em: 30 abr. 2023.
PILEROT, O.; HAMMARFELT, B.; MORING, C. The many faces of practice theory in library and information studies. IR Information Research, [s. l.], v. 22, n. 1, 2017. Disponível em: https://www.informationr.net/ir/22-1/colis/colis1602.html. Acesso em: 30 abr. 2023.
PRÍNCIPE, P.; BOAVIDA, C.; RODRIGUES, E.; CARVALHO, J.; SARAIVA, R. Os investigadores em Portugal e a sua relação com o Acesso Aberto à produção científica. Em: RODRIGUES, E.; SWAN, A.; BAPTISTA, A. A. (Eds.). Uma Década de Acesso Aberto na UMinho e no Mundo. Braga: Universidade do Minho, Serviços de Documentação, 2013. p. 173–186.
PRÍNCIPE, P.; CORREIA, A.; MOURA, P. C. M.; RODRIGUES, E. Estratégia Institucional para a gestão de dados de investigação na UMINHO: o papel dos SDUM. Em: SUSTENTABILIDADE E TRANSFORMAÇÃO, 13. , 2018, Anais... . Em: CONGRESSO NACIONAL DE BIBLIOTECÁRIOS, ARQUIVISTAS E DOCUMENTALISTAS. [s.l: s.n.] Disponível em: https://publicacoes.bad.pt/revistas/index.php/congressosbad/article/view/1812. Acesso em: 30 abr. 2023.
PRÍNCIPE, P.; SARAIVA, R.; BOAVIDA, C. P.; TRUTA, R.; RODRIGUES, E.; CARVALHO, J. Estudo sobre os dados científicos gerados no âmbito da investigação produzida na Universidade do Minho. Cadernos BAD, [s. l.], n. 2, p. 3–14, 2014. Disponível em: https://publicacoes.bad.pt/revistas/index.php/cadernos/article/view/1173. Acesso em: 30 abr. 2023.
ROSS. The Role of ERPANET in Supporting Digital Curation and Preservation in Europe. D-Lib Magazine, [s. l.], v. 10, n. 7/8, 2004. Disponível em: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/july04/ross/07ross.html. Acesso em: 30 abr. 2023.
SAVOLAINEN, R. Information Behavior and Information Practice: Reviewing the “Umbrella Concepts” of Information?Seeking Studies. The Library Quarterly, [s. l.], v. 77, n. 2, p. 109–132, 2007. Disponível em: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/517840. Acesso em: 30 abr. 2023.
SAYÃO, L. F.; SALES, L. F. Curadoria digital: um novo patamar para preservação de dados digitais de pesquisa. Informação &Amp; Sociedade: Estudos, [s. l.], v. 22, n. 3, 2012. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufpb.br/ojs/index.php/ies/article/view/12224. Acesso em: 30 abr. 2023.
SILVA, G. M. ; GLÓRIA, A. C.; SALGUEIRO, Â. S.; ALMEIDA, B.; MONTEIRO, D.; FREITAS, M. R. ; FREIRE, N. ROSSIO Infrastructure: A Digital Humanities Platform to Explore the Portuguese Cultural Heritage. Information, [s. l.], v. 13, n. 2, p. 50, 2022. Disponível em: https://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/13/2/50. Acesso em: 16 mar. 2023.
UNESCO. Recomendação da UNESCO sobre Ciência Aberta. Brasília: UNESCO Office Brasía, 2022. Disponível em: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379949_por. Acesso em: 28 abr. 2023.
VAN LOON, J. E.; AKERS, K. G.; HUDSON, C.; SARKOZY, A. Quality evaluation of data management plans at a research university. IFLA Journal, [s. l.], v. 43, n. 1, p. 98–104, 2017. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035216682041. Acesso em: 30 abr. 2023.
WHITTINGTON, R. Completing the Practice Turn in Strategy Research. Organization Studies, [s. l.], v. 27, n. 5, p. 613–634, 2006. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606064101. Acesso em: 30 abr. 2023.
WILKINSON, M. D. et al. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, [s. l.], v. 3, n. 1, p. 160018, 2016. Disponível em: https://www.nature.com/articles/sdata201618. Acesso em: 16 mar. 2023.
YARIME, M.; TRENCHER, G.; MINO, T.; SCHOLZ, R. W.; OLSSON, L.; NESS, B.; FRANTZESKAKI, N.; ROTMANS, J. Establishing sustainability science in higher education institutions: towards an integration of academic development, institutionalization, and stakeholder collaborations. Sustainability Science, [s. l.], v. 7, n. 1, p. 101–113, 2012. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-012-0157-5. Acesso em: 16 mar. 2023.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Paula Ochôa, Ângela Salgueiro, Bruno Almeida, Silvana Roque de Oliveira, Rui Araújo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author must guarantee that:
- there is full consensus among all the coauthors in approving the final version of the document and its submission for publication.
- the work is original, and when the work and/or words from other people were used, they were properly acknowledged.
Plagiarism in all of its forms constitutes an unethical publication behavior and is unacceptable. Encontros Bibli has the right to use software or any other method of plagiarism detection.
All manuscripts submitted to Encontros Bibli go through plagiarism and self-plagiarism identification. Plagiarism identified during the evaluation process will result in the filing of the submission. In case plagiarism is identified in a manuscript published in the journal, the Editor-in-Chief will conduct a preliminary investigation and, if necessary, will make a retraction.
This journal, following the recommendations of the Open Source movement, provides full open access to its content. By doing this, the authors keep all of their rights allowing Encontros Bibli to publish and make its articles available to the whole community.
Encontros Bibli content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Any user has the right to:
- Share - copy, download, print or redistribute the material in any medium or format.
- Adapt - remix, transform and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
According to the following terms:
- Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything that the license permits.