The design of energy technologies as a value-sensitive project
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1677-2954.2026.e110627Keywords:
philosophy of technology, energy transition, value-sensitive design, sociotechnical designAbstract
This article investigates the philosophical foundations of technological design in the context of the energy transition. It argues that energy constitutes an unavoidable technological problem of modernity. However, beyond a technical challenge, this imperative presents itself as a complex philosophical problem, demanding critical reflection on its underlying ends and values. Given the inevitability of the expansion and diversification of the energy matrix, the central question shifts from the technical “how” to the ethical and sociotechnical “why” and “for what purpose.” The analysis demonstrates that the conception, implementation, and disposal of energy technologies are sociotechnical practices saturated with values, materializing worldviews, societal projects, and hierarchies of power. It is concluded that the energy transition cannot be guided exclusively by techno-economic criteria, at the risk of reproducing asymmetries and negative externalities. As an alternative, the article proposes the construction of a multidimensional normative framework—sensitive to ethical, environmental, and cultural values—and the adoption of an approach capable of articulating value-based tensions. Finally, it is argued that energy development should be guided by the principle of practical wisdom, understood here as a normative planning that requires prudential deliberation among multiple conflicting values, articulating technical, ethical, environmental, and social dimensions in socio-technical decision-making. This principle is not reduced to a fixed set of rules, but operates as a reflective competence capable of evaluating concrete contexts and guiding responsible choices in technological design.
References
DAVIS, J.; NATHAN, L. P. Value sensitive design: applications, adaptations, and critiques. In: HOVEN, J. van de; VERMAAS, P. E.; POEL, I. van de (eds.). Handbook of ethics and values in technological design: sources, theory, values and application domains. Springer, 2015.
DE WILDT, Tessa; VAN DE POEL, Ibo; CHAPPIN, Emile. Tracking long-term value change in energy technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 167, 2021.
FEENBERG, Andrew. Between reason and experience: essays in technology and modernity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2010.
FEENBERG, Andrew. Questioning technology. Londres: Routledge, 1999.
FLORIDI, Luciano; COWLS, Josh. A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Review, v. 1, n. 1, 2019.
FRAY, H. Hello world: how to be human in the age of the machine. New York: Random House, 2018.
FRIEDMAN, B.; KAHN, P. H. JR.; BORNING, A. Value sensitive design: theory and methods. UW CSE Technical Report, 2002.
FRIEDMAN, Batya; HENDRY, David G. Value sensitive design: shaping technology with moral imagination. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2019.
GEELS, Frank W.; SCHOT, Johan. Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, v. 36, n. 3, p. 399–417, 2007.
HEFFERNAN, Eoin et al. The social impacts of the energy transition. Energy Research & Social Science, v. 80, 2021.
MIDDELVEEN, Adriaan; VAN DE POEL, Ibo. Ethics by design: a conceptual approach. Philosophy & Technology, v. 34, n. 4, p. 1097–1122, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00453-1.
MOK, Luisa; HYYSALO, Sampsa. Designing for energy transition through value sensitive design. Design Studies, v. 54, p. 162–183, jan. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2017.09.006.
MUMFORD, Lewis. Technics and civilization. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company, 1934.
OWEN, Richard; BESSANT, John; HEINTZ, Maggy (Ed.). Responsible innovation. Chichester: Wiley, 2013.
PACHAURI, Shonali; NAKICENOVIC, Nebojsa. Rethinking development and energy security: towards inclusive energy pathways. Energy Policy, v. 32, n. 2, p. 165-176, 2004.
PETERSON, M.; SPAHN, A. Can technological artefacts be moral agents? Science and Engineering Ethics, v. 17, n. 3, p. 411–424, 2011. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-010-9241-3.
PITT, J. C. Guns don’t kill, people kill: values in and/or around technologies. In: KROES, P.; VERBEEK, P. P. (eds.). The moral status of technical artefacts. Dordrecht/Heidelberg/New York/London: Springer, 2014.
SCHEER, Hermann. The energy imperative: 100 percent renewable now. Londres: Routledge, 2012.
SCHULER, Douglas; NAMIOKA, Aki (Ed.). Participatory design: principles and practices. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1993.
SMIL, Vaclav. How the world really works: a scientist’s guide to our past, present and future. Londres: Viking, 2022.
SMIL, Vaclav. Energy and civilization: a history. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2017.
SOVACOOL, Benjamin K. Contesting the future of nuclear power: a critical global assessment of atomic energy. Londres: World Scientific, 2011.
SOVACOOL, Benjamin K. Energy and ethics: justice and the global energy challenge. Londres: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
STERN, David I. The role of energy in economic growth. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, v. 1219, n. 1, p. 26-51, 2011.
VAN DE HOVEN, Jeroen; VERMAAS, Pieter E.; VAN DE POEL, Ibo (Eds.). Handbook of ethics, values, and technological design: sources, theory, values and application domains. Dordrecht: Springer, 2015.
VAN DEN HOVEN, Jeroen. Design for values and values for design. Information Age, v. 4, n. 4, p. 4–7, 2007.
VERBEEK, Peter-Paul. Moralizing technology: understanding and designing the morality of things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011.
WINNER, Langdon. Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, v. 109, n. 1, p. 121-136, 1980.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Gilmar Evandro Szczepanik

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and publication rights over their works, without restrictions.
Upon submitting their work, authors grant ethic@ the exclusive right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 International License. This license allows third parties to remix, adapt, and build upon the published work, provided that proper credit is given to the authorship and to the original publication in this journal.
Authors are also permitted to enter into additional contracts, separately, for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work in this journal (for example: deposit in an institutional repository, make it available on a personal website, publish translations, or include it as a book chapter), provided that authorship and the initial publication in ethic@ are acknowledged.
