Divine intellect, human intellect – and artificial intelligence? A reinterpreted metaphysical perspective departing from Christian Wolff
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1677-2954.2026.e111223Keywords:
divine intellect, human intellect, artificial intelligence, Christian WolffAbstract
This paper aims to investigate the relationship between the concepts of divine intellect and human intellect as a philosophical background for the discussion of artificial intelligence. We take Christian Wolff’s philosophy as our philosophical reference for the discussion, this being perhaps the last great account of the subject prior to Kantian criticism against traditional metaphysics. In the first section, we present Wolff’s definition of “intellect” [Verstand; intellectus] as the faculty to represent distinctly that which is possible, that is, which is not contradictory. In the second section, we compare the notions of the (imperfect) human intellect and of the (perfect) divine intellect. Finally, in the third section, we draw considerations about the possibility of artificial intelligence as a kind of intellect between human and divine intellect – departing from key insights from Wolff’s philosophy but reformulated for contemporary debates.
References
BLUMENFELD, David. “Perfection and happiness in the best possible world”. In: JOLLEY, Nicholas (ed.). The Cambridge companion to Leibniz. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 382-410, 1995.
ÉCOLE, Jean. Introduction à l’Opus Metaphysicum de Christian Wolff. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin, 1985.
ÉCOLE, Jean. La métaphysique de Christian Wolff. Hildesheim – Zürich – New York: Georg Olms Verlag, 1990.
KLEMME, Heiner. „Freiheit und Selbstherrschaft: Über den gemeinsamen Grund von Theodizee und moralischer Verbindlichkeit beim frühen Kant“. In: JOSIFOVIĆ, Saša; NOLLER, Jörg (Hrsg.). Freiheit nach Kant: tradition, rezeption, transformation, aktualität. Leiden/Boston: Brill, p. 37-53, 2019.
LANZINI STOBBE, Emanuel. Is Christian Wolff’s practical philosophy eudaimonistic? In: SCHIERBAUM, Sonja; WALSCHOTS, Michael; WALSH, John (Orgs.). Christian Wolff’s german ethics. New Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 153-173, 2024.
LANZINI STOBBE, Emanuel. Reason, perfection, obligation: Christian Wolff and the kantian counterpoint. 2023. 289 p. Doctoral thesis (Promotionsstudium/Doutorado in Philosophy) – Philosophischen Fakultät Sozialwissenschaften und historische Kulturwissenschaften, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg/Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (cotutelle de these), Halle an der Saale/Campinas, 2023.
LEIBNIZ, Gottfried Wilhelm; WOLFF, Christian. Briefwechsel zwischen Leibniz und Christian Wolff. Aus den Handschriften der Koeniglichen Bibliothek zu Hannover. Hrsg. von C. I. Gerhardt. Hildesheim – New York: Georg Olms Verlag, 1971.
LEIBNIZ, G. W. Philosophical essays. Edited and Translated by Roger Ariew and Daniel Garber. Hackett Publishing Company: Indianapolis & Cambridge, 1989.
RUSSEL, Stuart; NORVIG, Peter. Inteligência artificial. Terceira edição. Tradução de Regina Célia Simille. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2013.
THEIS, Robert. „Theologie“. In: THEIS, Robert; AICHELE, Alexander (Hrsg.). Handbuch Christian Wolff. Springer VS: Wiesbaden, 2018, p. 219-250.
WOLFF, Christian. Gesammelte Werke. Hildesheim – Zürich – New York: Georg Olms Verlag, 1962.
WOLFF, Christian. Metafisica tedesca con le Annotazioni alla Metafisica tedesca. Testo tedesco a fronte. Introduzione, traduzione, note e apparati a cura di Raffaele Ciafardone. Milano: Bompiani, 2003.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Emanuel Lanzini Stobbe

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and publication rights over their works, without restrictions.
Upon submitting their work, authors grant ethic@ the exclusive right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 International License. This license allows third parties to remix, adapt, and build upon the published work, provided that proper credit is given to the authorship and to the original publication in this journal.
Authors are also permitted to enter into additional contracts, separately, for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work in this journal (for example: deposit in an institutional repository, make it available on a personal website, publish translations, or include it as a book chapter), provided that authorship and the initial publication in ethic@ are acknowledged.
