Alasdair MacIntyre's criticism to John Rawls' rational consensus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1677-2954.2021.e79930Keywords:
Treinamento de Força, Velocidade de Contração, Repetição MáximaAbstract
The aim of this paper is to present Alasdair MacIntyre’s moral critique against the theory suggested by John Rawls concerning the difficulty of rational consensus to define the criteria of the original position, in order to elaborate the basic theory of society. This paper also characterizes the essential elements of MacIntyre’s theory as an alternative to Rawls’ model by using concepts like the narrative of humans’ life, the practice and the tradition and how these help in the elaboration of a rational criterion that is appropriate to the behaviors of particular lives. Finally, some criticism to MacIntyre’s theory will be exposed for the purpose of theoretical improvement and update.
References
BORRADORI, Giovanna. Filosofia Americana. São Paulo: Unesp, 2003.
CARVALHO, Helder Buenos Aires de. Tradição e Racionalidade na Filosofia de MacIntyre. 2ª ed. Teresina: EDUFPI, 2011.
D’ANDREA, Thomas. Tradition, Rationality and Virtue: The Thought of Alasdair MacIntyre. Surrey, UK: Ashgate, 2006.
MCMYLOR, Peter. Alasdair MacIntyre: Critic of Modernity. London: Routledge, 1994.
MACINTYRE, Alasdair. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. 3rd edition. Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 2007.
MACINTYRE, Alasdair. Whose Justice? Which Rationality?. Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 1988.
MURPHY, Nancy; KALLENBERG, Brad; NATION, Mark Thiessen. Virtues and Practices in the Christian Tradition: Christian Ethics after MacIntyre. Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 2003.
MULHALL, Stephen; SWIFT, Adam. Liberals and Communitarians. 2nd ed. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers Inc., 1996.
NOZICK, Robert. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books, 2013.
RAWLS, John. A Theory of Justice. Revised edition. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1999.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and publication rights over their works, without restrictions.
Upon submitting their work, authors grant ethic@ the exclusive right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 International License. This license allows third parties to remix, adapt, and build upon the published work, provided that proper credit is given to the authorship and to the original publication in this journal.
Authors are also permitted to enter into additional contracts, separately, for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work in this journal (for example: deposit in an institutional repository, make it available on a personal website, publish translations, or include it as a book chapter), provided that authorship and the initial publication in ethic@ are acknowledged.
